Page 80 of 101

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 1:23 am
by iMoreland
I dont trust them to introduce Sister Abigail correctly. So I hope they never do

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 1:32 am
by iMoreland
On Smackdown after Rusev beat Kalisto, Titus O'Neil came out and confronted Rusev.

Hopefully that means they aren't feeding Rusev to Cena and actually giving Rusev a push.

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 2:23 am
by Dunthreevy
iMoreland wrote:On Smackdown after Rusev beat Kalisto, Titus O'Neil came out and confronted Rusev.

Hopefully that means they aren't feeding Rusev to Cena and actually giving Rusev a push.

Careful what you wish for. There's still an open spot in the MITB ladder match. Would you rather Cena go back into a program with Rusev or win MITB and take that spot from someone?

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 2:48 am
by WRau1
Last spot will go to Orton or Wyatt, imo.

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 5:46 am
by RedBulls23
Really hope they give Ambrose money in the bank.

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 11:23 am
by TheBatman
Dunthreevy wrote:
WRau1 wrote:So is there going to be two main championships again? If so, could they make the MITB match for the Smackdown championship?


God, I hope not. Let the US Title and the IC Title be exclusive to their own shows (don't really care which title is exclusive to which show). The WWE World Heavyweight Champion should not be bound to any one show. That keeps the top dog free to float back and forth and create compelling title feuds wherever.


Agree. I prefer 1 champ / both shows.

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 12:01 pm
by WRau1
Apparently the rumor is that both brands will have their own World Heavyweight Championship. The IC, Women's Championship and US titles will be exclusive to whichever show the holder is on and the tag titles will be on both shows. Not likely now but there has been talk of a second Women's Championship belt being introduced eventually, most likely Tag Titles. Both shows will be on each ppv with their own announce team. The Monday Night Raws after major PPVs will feature both shows.

Not a fan of the Women's Championship being exclusive but I like the sounds of everything else. I wonder if the WWE will reintroduce the Cruiserweight Championship with the brand split and tournament?

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 1:53 pm
by Spens1
WRau1 wrote:Apparently the rumor is that both brands will have their own World Heavyweight Championship. The IC, Women's Championship and US titles will be exclusive to whichever show the holder is on and the tag titles will be on both shows. Not likely now but there has been talk of a second Women's Championship belt being introduced eventually, most likely Tag Titles. Both shows will be on each ppv with their own announce team. The Monday Night Raws after major PPVs will feature both shows.

Not a fan of the Women's Championship being exclusive but I like the sounds of everything else. I wonder if the WWE will reintroduce the Cruiserweight Championship with the brand split and tournament?


Womens division and title on raw maybe? ideally you would have two women's titles but what the hell do you call the other title without it sounding terrible. They could/should introduce a women's tag team title though, maybe that gives some women something (those not in title contention or who are lower down the women's division).

I'm probably one of the few people who likes two world titles, gives each show legitimacy and makes them feel like actual separate promotions, so long as they don't roam like the end of the brand split (basically killed the WHC), that has to be strictly enforced. Also first champ should be legit (i think i posted my rosters and stuff and had Seth winning it first, you need a main eventer to win it first, and he's better than cena's 16th reign or reigns killing smackdown).

IC title and US should be exclusive secondary titles, one on raw and one on smackdown.

YEah the cruiserweight title should go to whichever brand doesn't have the womens title (smackdown probably along with every cruserweight wrestler since they're all doing nothing anyway).

I hope they do bring back separate PPV's or at the very least separate network specials. Also the announce team is already different mostly (Byron i'd imagine stays on Raw as the whipping boy, Corey Graves to Smackdown with Lawler and Ranello) so not much will change their.

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 4:15 pm
by Polk377
Spens1 wrote:
WRau1 wrote:Apparently the rumor is that both brands will have their own World Heavyweight Championship. The IC, Women's Championship and US titles will be exclusive to whichever show the holder is on and the tag titles will be on both shows. Not likely now but there has been talk of a second Women's Championship belt being introduced eventually, most likely Tag Titles. Both shows will be on each ppv with their own announce team. The Monday Night Raws after major PPVs will feature both shows.

Not a fan of the Women's Championship being exclusive but I like the sounds of everything else. I wonder if the WWE will reintroduce the Cruiserweight Championship with the brand split and tournament?


Womens division and title on raw maybe? ideally you would have two women's titles but what the hell do you call the other title without it sounding terrible. They could/should introduce a women's tag team title though, maybe that gives some women something (those not in title contention or who are lower down the women's division).

I'm probably one of the few people who likes two world titles, gives each show legitimacy and makes them feel like actual separate promotions, so long as they don't roam like the end of the brand split (basically killed the WHC), that has to be strictly enforced. Also first champ should be legit (i think i posted my rosters and stuff and had Seth winning it first, you need a main eventer to win it first, and he's better than cena's 16th reign or reigns killing smackdown).

IC title and US should be exclusive secondary titles, one on raw and one on smackdown.

YEah the cruiserweight title should go to whichever brand doesn't have the womens title (smackdown probably along with every cruserweight wrestler since they're all doing nothing anyway).

I hope they do bring back separate PPV's or at the very least separate network specials. Also the announce team is already different mostly (Byron i'd imagine stays on Raw as the whipping boy, Corey Graves to Smackdown with Lawler and Ranello) so not much will change their.


I have a feeling the WWE World Title will stay on Raw along with IC and Tag Titles. I think before the brand split Roman Reigns will lose the title and be the face of Smackdown as the new champ there. The Women's Division and US title will move to Smackdown where they will have more opportunity and be able to main event some shows. I would like a Women's tag division but I don't see it happening. Tag Team wrestling is an art that most of the Women aren't trained for.

I would love for Smackdown to bring in Corey Graves as part of the announce team. He would do well with King and Ranello.

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 5:25 pm
by WRau1
Amato is very well versed in women's tag wresting, she could bring some of the girls up to speed enough to make the division passable until NXT gets some actual dedicated women tag teams.

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 10:24 pm
by whysoserious
From a PPV perspective, would be cool to see them to do One Raw PPV, One Smackdown PPV and elevate the four main PPV's for both shows. Sets up a quarterly schedule and elevates SummerSlam, Survivor Series, Royal Rumble and WrestleMania.


WM in April, Raw PPV, Smackdown PPV, SummerSlam (moved up to July), Raw PPV, Smackdown PPV, Survivor Series (moved up to October), Raw PPV, Smackdown PPV, Royal Rumble, Raw PPV, Smackdown PPV.

Then just repeat the schedule.

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 11:07 pm
by Dunthreevy
whysoserious wrote:From a PPV perspective, would be cool to see them to do One Raw PPV, One Smackdown PPV and elevate the four main PPV's for both shows. Sets up a quarterly schedule and elevates SummerSlam, Survivor Series, Royal Rumble and WrestleMania.


WM in April, Raw PPV, Smackdown PPV, SummerSlam (moved up to July), Raw PPV, Smackdown PPV, Survivor Series (moved up to October), Raw PPV, Smackdown PPV, Royal Rumble, Raw PPV, Smackdown PPV.

Then just repeat the schedule.


I'd be all for that. I miss the days when the big 4 actually felt like the BIG 4. You can't tell the difference between Summerslam Payback at this point.

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 1:19 am
by iMoreland
If they debut a new World Title for Smackdown, they should do a tournament that starts at Battleground and ends at SummerSlam.

My pick is for the finals to be Cena/Cesaro at SummerSlam with Cesaro winning. But that's just me dreaming

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 2:49 am
by Spens1
Polk377 wrote:
Spens1 wrote:
WRau1 wrote:Apparently the rumor is that both brands will have their own World Heavyweight Championship. The IC, Women's Championship and US titles will be exclusive to whichever show the holder is on and the tag titles will be on both shows. Not likely now but there has been talk of a second Women's Championship belt being introduced eventually, most likely Tag Titles. Both shows will be on each ppv with their own announce team. The Monday Night Raws after major PPVs will feature both shows.

Not a fan of the Women's Championship being exclusive but I like the sounds of everything else. I wonder if the WWE will reintroduce the Cruiserweight Championship with the brand split and tournament?


Womens division and title on raw maybe? ideally you would have two women's titles but what the hell do you call the other title without it sounding terrible. They could/should introduce a women's tag team title though, maybe that gives some women something (those not in title contention or who are lower down the women's division).

I'm probably one of the few people who likes two world titles, gives each show legitimacy and makes them feel like actual separate promotions, so long as they don't roam like the end of the brand split (basically killed the WHC), that has to be strictly enforced. Also first champ should be legit (i think i posted my rosters and stuff and had Seth winning it first, you need a main eventer to win it first, and he's better than cena's 16th reign or reigns killing smackdown).

IC title and US should be exclusive secondary titles, one on raw and one on smackdown.

YEah the cruiserweight title should go to whichever brand doesn't have the womens title (smackdown probably along with every cruserweight wrestler since they're all doing nothing anyway).

I hope they do bring back separate PPV's or at the very least separate network specials. Also the announce team is already different mostly (Byron i'd imagine stays on Raw as the whipping boy, Corey Graves to Smackdown with Lawler and Ranello) so not much will change their.


I have a feeling the WWE World Title will stay on Raw along with IC and Tag Titles. I think before the brand split Roman Reigns will lose the title and be the face of Smackdown as the new champ there. The Women's Division and US title will move to Smackdown where they will have more opportunity and be able to main event some shows. I would like a Women's tag division but I don't see it happening. Tag Team wrestling is an art that most of the Women aren't trained for.

I would love for Smackdown to bring in Corey Graves as part of the announce team. He would do well with King and Ranello.


oh no, i got too to much love for smackdown for Reigns to end up there, please don't do that to the blue brand, would rather have Seth coming over as the main event heel, Ambrose as a main event face and Wyatt (as a tweener?) coming over as the three major main eventers as well as guys like styles, cesaro, K.O (who could be a main eventer soon) and zayn. guys who are high up the card but haven't made the jump up to main eventers yet.

Raw can keep Lesnar, Cena, Reigns and Orton to be honest, they draw with the casuals and from the sounds of it, raw will be the show for the casuals (if it stays the same).

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 2:50 am
by Spens1
iMoreland wrote:If they debut a new World Title for Smackdown, they should do a tournament that starts at Battleground and ends at SummerSlam.

My pick is for the finals to be Cena/Cesaro at SummerSlam with Cesaro winning. But that's just me dreaming


one could only hope

knowing wwe though cena gets his sweet 16th and the reign of terror continues on the other :nonono:

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 12:31 am
by iMoreland
Doesn't it make sense for Bray Wyatt to attack Cena during his return? Cena did ruin Wyatt's moment at WrestleMania

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 2:02 am
by Brandon-Clyde
iMoreland wrote:I dont trust them to introduce Sister Abigail correctly. So I hope they never do

I want Sister Abigail to be Abigail J Lee :D

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 5:42 am
by Spens1
iMoreland wrote:Doesn't it make sense for Bray Wyatt to attack Cena during his return? Cena did ruin Wyatt's moment at WrestleMania


yeah but i don't trust them to book Wyatt well. If booking actually made sense Wyatt would destroy Cena Lesnar style

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 5:51 am
by improper
Spens1 wrote:
iMoreland wrote:Doesn't it make sense for Bray Wyatt to attack Cena during his return? Cena did ruin Wyatt's moment at WrestleMania


yeah but i don't trust them to book Wyatt well. If booking actually made sense Wyatt would destroy Cena Lesnar style


Are you implying that the WWE has less than adequate booking? :lol:

Re: WWE TV Thread Goes Hollywood

Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 7:32 am
by Spens1
improper wrote:
Spens1 wrote:
iMoreland wrote:Doesn't it make sense for Bray Wyatt to attack Cena during his return? Cena did ruin Wyatt's moment at WrestleMania


yeah but i don't trust them to book Wyatt well. If booking actually made sense Wyatt would destroy Cena Lesnar style


Are you implying that the WWE has less than adequate booking? :lol:


yeah who am i to question WWE's sound booking such as having a midget beating chavo and pushing a guy who is universally hated as a babyface. :lol: