Wizenheimer wrote:JasonStern wrote:DaVoiceMaster wrote:How come no love for Oregon's Young?
at 6'2", he's very undersized for a two guard and lacks the handles to play the point..
Portland already has that covered
McCollum is 6'3"... in shoes... with platforms.
but honestly, McCollum is a good comparison for Joseph Young. both are defensive liabilities, but could be offensive weapons. ultimately, McCollum is (at this time) a better shot, so he's a better option in an offense with heavy ball movement like Portland, whereas while Young can shoot, he also relies more on his ability to drive on opponents. if the Blazers bought a second round pick, I'd be perfectly fine drafting Young. the fact that most mock drafts have the Pac-12 player of the year going undrafted is confusing. it's not like he didn't put up good numbers against legit teams while being the primary focus of opposing team's defenses.
Wizenheimer wrote:if anyone is interested, a somewhat rough analysis of expected performance of draft picks by order over a 30 year period:
http://www.82games.com/nbadraftpicks.htm
I hate how those stats are presented. if the Blazers get the 24th pick, they don't have a higher chance of landing a star than the 23rd pick. a better way of presenting it is by summing up subsequent picks and stating "if you drafted perfectly, historically you have this % chance of drafting a star/starter/role player/bench player/scrub/bust".