@
Time: 5:00PM
Place: San Antonio
TV: KGW
GLB of the game Dianna Agron
Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem, The Sebastian Express
zzaj wrote:For Christmas this year, I'd like to see 50% PnR/PnP with Nurkic in this game.
Epicurus wrote:zzaj wrote:For Christmas this year, I'd like to see 50% PnR/PnP with Nurkic in this game.
I prefer 30+ minutes and around 12 fgas for Vonleh.
GreenRiddler wrote:Bring it in fellas you don't deserve an early break but you'll get one. I always find it funny how NBA players don't want to tank cause that means a young upshot is gonna come and just take your place, like McCollum did to Wes when we tanked at the end of 2012.
Well the way these guys were playing outside of our top 3. I hope they get replaced this draft. Give me Tatum/Isaacs/Bridges/Laurri.
Roy The Natural wrote:GreenRiddler wrote:Bring it in fellas you don't deserve an early break but you'll get one. I always find it funny how NBA players don't want to tank cause that means a young upshot is gonna come and just take your place, like McCollum did to Wes when we tanked at the end of 2012.
Well the way these guys were playing outside of our top 3. I hope they get replaced this draft. Give me Tatum/Isaacs/Bridges/Laurri.
Bridges should be going later too.. I don't want him, but if you do shouldn't have to spend our pick on him most likely.
Whoops, Nvmd, for some reason I spaced and was thinking of Giles. Yea I like Bridges potential too, although I think he's going to need to be a 3&D player with potential to be a high level cutter if he plays intelligently. Although if he can lock down a better handle (not out of the question), he could really become good.
I like a cluster of Markkanen/Isaac/Bridges with our first pick.
Isaac is probably my favorite out of the prospects that could end up in the Blazers range, I think that he potentially offers a lot of what the Blazers need, some shooting with solid weakside rim protection should come fairly quickly for him IMO. I don't necessarily know if he's capable of reaching his vast potential though.
I'd also be willing to take a shot at R. Williams, I'm not sold at him at the next level... but I do think that he can fairly immediately fill a role of being a good defender who chases opposing 4s around at a high level, even if he's struggling to bring much else off the bat.
Markkanen could end up being really great offensively, I just worry that with the current team construction his defense is going to be an issue. At worst he turns into to a super rich man Meyers Leonard though, and that's already an upgrade.
The nice thing about the guys on the list, is that many of them can already fill a role for the Blazers if they just hit their perceived potential floor. They will be going to a team that has plenty of shot creation on offense, but a team that needs some niche things, which I think many of these guys can bring right off the bat, while they hopefully follow the work ethic lead of Portland's best players and can progress in areas that they are currently deficient at.
HotrodBeaubois wrote:I never said Dallas was good as Portland
HotrodBeaubois wrote:That's the Whole Point Portland is No better than Dallas
Oden2 wrote:Hurd is incredibly irritating
Roy The Natural wrote:Oden2 wrote:Hurd is incredibly irritating
Can't you just watch it on ESPN?
Return to Portland Trail Blazers