yardbarker

Mark Mastrov

Moderators: pillwenney, ICMTM

ImageImageImageImageImage

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby pillwenney on Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:36 pm

I'm not so sure how it is. The league can't make the Maloofs sell to Burkle, who we already know they don't want to sell to.

I mean, right?
User avatar
pillwenney
Senior Mod
 
Posts: 45961
And1: 732
Joined: Sep 18, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby boogie-reke on Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:38 pm

They can do whatever they want, in theory - iirc there's the "for the good of the league" thing that is basically a "do whatever we want" rule.

Question is will they want to do that.
“Its my 2nd year of losing and Im not trying to get used to this.I didnt want to get use to it last year.I had enough of it. Its time to turn it around”
-DeMarcus Cousins

“Rookie or not- Im not letting anybody relax"
-Thomas Robinson
boogie-reke
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6261
And1: 115
Joined: Nov 4, 2010

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby kevin44 on Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:42 pm

It's too late now. The deal is done & locals would be crazy to pay 525 million for 65% of this team. The whole team is only worth 300 million. We need to get local buyers together & start planning a new arena in hopes of getting the next expansion team.
kevin44
Senior
 
Posts: 646
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 17, 2003

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby Inigo_Montoya on Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:56 pm

The offer was 341 million for 65% of the team.
Inigo_Montoya
Pro Prospect
 
Posts: 757
And1: 29
Joined: Jun 6, 2012
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby OGSactownballer on Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:06 pm

See, this is what I have been trying to point out over and over again.

The Maloofs are NOT getting 525 million for 65%.

They ARE getting more than hey should and this just goes to prove that they are underhanded gutless crooks. The difference to the full 525 million is the nearly two hundred million dollars owed to Sacramento and the NBA that is due upon sale. They have hooked the Ballmer group into ponying up that cash just to have a shot at a team, and essentially letting the Magoofs off Scott free.

Local ownership would be able to work a new deal for the money owed the city and also pay off the NBA loan at their regular rate so basically the only thing that needs to be met is an arena deal and beating the 341 price for their and Bob Whatshisnames shares.
OGSactownballer
Veteran
 
Posts: 2961
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 2, 2005

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby Inigo_Montoya on Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:43 pm

Inigo_Montoya
Pro Prospect
 
Posts: 757
And1: 29
Joined: Jun 6, 2012
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby ADoaN17 on Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:39 am

Nice. Hopefully KJ can get 1 more big investor.
Image
User avatar
ADoaN17
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 3793
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 11, 2010

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby kevin44 on Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:22 am

If the Maloofs receive the 30 million deposit on Feb 1 as planned it's over. Stern knows he has to be careful because he doesn't want a lawsuit. If Stern can delay or stop the 30 million non refundable payment we have a chance still. Watching the news last night they talking about a chance the Maloofs will walk away from Arco & the 77 million they owe to the bond holders.
kevin44
Senior
 
Posts: 646
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 17, 2003

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby jdbraver on Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:12 pm

kevin44 wrote:If the Maloofs receive the 30 million deposit on Feb 1 as planned it's over. Stern knows he has to be careful because he doesn't want a lawsuit. If Stern can delay or stop the 30 million non refundable payment we have a chance still. Watching the news last night they talking about a chance the Maloofs will walk away from Arco & the 77 million they owe to the bond holders.


Says who? You? And you are?
jdbraver
Ballboy
 
Posts: 18
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 21, 2005

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby Dustin5566 on Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:14 pm

kevin44 wrote:If the Maloofs receive the 30 million deposit on Feb 1 as planned it's over. Stern knows he has to be careful because he doesn't want a lawsuit. If Stern can delay or stop the 30 million non refundable payment we have a chance still. Watching the news last night they talking about a chance the Maloofs will walk away from Arco & the 77 million they owe to the bond holders.


So wrong...

To simplify..Think about buying a house from the owner. Owners agree and sale you the house, however, it is up to the bank to approve the sale or not. If you give the owners $5,000 as a "down-payment" do you think the bank gives a s**t about your personal agreement? NOPE!

Same goes with the NBA, Hanson can give the Maloofs whatever they want in a contract, doesn't matter, that is his bad. He knows the rules. The sale is CONTINGENT UPON....NBA approval.

My guess is the 30 million was just to get the Maloofs to stop complaining and sign.
Image
User avatar
Dustin5566
Veteran
 
Posts: 2765
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby VeeJay24 on Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:57 pm

kevin44 wrote:It's too late now. The deal is done & locals would be crazy to pay 525 million for 65% of this team. The whole team is only worth 300 million. We need to get local buyers together & start planning a new arena in hopes of getting the next expansion team.


Hey kevin 44, I don't know who you are but you can't be a resident of Sacramento or a fan of the Kings! Please stop posting negativity and trying to get people to give up and think this is hopeless!!

Your negativity and doubt is an indicator that you are really on the other side of this and I personally think it does a disservice to the residents of Sacramento.
Sportz Gza
VeeJay24
Starter
 
Posts: 2015
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 18, 2002
Location: Washington DC

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby SacTown Kings on Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:51 am

kevin44 wrote:If the Maloofs receive the 30 million deposit on Feb 1 as planned it's over. Stern knows he has to be careful because he doesn't want a lawsuit. If Stern can delay or stop the 30 million non refundable payment we have a chance still. Watching the news last night they talking about a chance the Maloofs will walk away from Arco & the 77 million they owe to the bond holders.


Kevin Stern isn't concerned about a lawsuit.The Maloofs threaten a lawsuit last year and Stern politely replied that some of his best friends are anti trust lawyers. If there is any lawsuits it would be between the Maloofs and the Seattle group, if the Seattle wants to give the Maloofs 30 million dollars thats on them, not the nba. The BOG is not going to base their decision on whether the Seattle group pissed away $30 million.
User avatar
SacTown Kings
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4367
And1: 5
Joined: May 11, 2003

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby ICMTM on Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:46 am

It's painfully obvious the Sacramento Kings have been neglected by their current owners.

The thing about Basketball is that people tune in to watch good teams. Kevin Durant in Oklahoma City is popular. He has the 2nd highest selling jersey (small market). Jason Williams at one point was the best selling jersey in the league (small market). It's not like baseball where when the Rays and the Blue Jays are playing people check out. Basketball is marketed by star power. I think Tim Duncan (Spurs) is the exception to the rule, but generally speaking when star players or good teams are in town or on TV people watch.

With that being said your audience goes far beyond your city when your team is good, and therefore the size of your market can mean something, however the ability to have a city embrace your team is invaluable.

IF (and I think KJ is far ahead of the curve here) there is an ownership team in place to keep the Kings in Sacramento and get an arena deal done then the NBA will keep them here. While Seattle is a great market etc etc the only thing wrong with Sacramento is the Maloofs and Sleep Train Arena. Removing the Maloofs and getting a new facility is the only thing preventing this team from being viable. Moving them to another city causes more issues.

Please correct me if I am wrong but Seattle drew a line in the sand after both the Seahawks and Mariners got new facilities that they weren't interested in any kind of new building and that's when the Sonics left? We have several models of new building. The Maloofs have just blocked them all. ALL OF THEM.

Anyway thinking about this objectively it just seems like the NBA would be just as happy removing the Maloof brothers and also keeping the team put. Stern has said on numerous occasions moving is not good. If this were a done deal why even entertain talking to Burkle or KJ at this point?
It ended like I said it would. Once relocation was shot down the Maloofs would take the money on the table and bounce. #KingsAllDay
ICMTM
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 15832
And1: 21
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby pillwenney on Tue Jan 29, 2013 2:39 pm

Yeah, for those reasons, I really don't think it's over yet.

One thing though, Seattle does now have a plan for a new arena. It's happening because it's getting a ton of private funding.
User avatar
pillwenney
Senior Mod
 
Posts: 45961
And1: 732
Joined: Sep 18, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/

Re: Mark Mastrov

Postby ICMTM on Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:01 pm

pillwenney wrote:Yeah, for those reasons, I really don't think it's over yet.

One thing though, Seattle does now have a plan for a new arena. It's happening because it's getting a ton of private funding.


From an article I read so do the Kings/Sacramento. It appears the railyard deal is still there. The Downtown plaza deal is new, and IMO it's THE place the arena should go. Making the railyards its own community is something that is not a good idea in its own right, but that is a different discussion.

The main thing is there is an arena proposal in place and AEG is still on board with it.
http://www.cowbellkingdom.com/2013/01/1 ... rena-deal/

So when I read between the lines the issue is how can the NBA get the Maloofs to sell to Sacramento. The simple answer is they cannot. They can only block a sale to Seattle. If the city can prove it has a team in place to run a good operation locally why would it move them? What city, when ownership is on the up and up, represents their team like we do? We rival maybe the Packers?
It ended like I said it would. Once relocation was shot down the Maloofs would take the money on the table and bounce. #KingsAllDay
ICMTM
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 15832
And1: 21
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca

Previous

Return to Sacramento Kings

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users