Jerome Randle

[Upperclass]

Eddie House.. less prolific

[ALL HAIL]

Naw man.

Jerome Randle is a PG first who just so happens to be able to shoot really, really well.

House and Pargo can't run a team like Randle although they are both bigger.

Randle is Dana Barros, Michael Adams, or Brooks.

[cmd1985]

Man I've been a fan of his he didn't get the pub of the other guys here in Illinois when they were in high school. It was a plethora of great PGs and wings, Rose, Randle, Jacob Pullen, Sherron Collins, Demetri McCamey, Evan Turner, Dre Liggins, Patrick Beverley, and Jon Scheyer.

As for Randle he can shoot with the best of em' he's clutch and he's a competitor. He's just so slight in frame.

[Mr.Raptorsingh]

You look at the playoffs, and you see just how important PGs who have quickness are.

If only Randle was a little bit bigger...at this point, he's probably a good change-of-pace backup PG.

He's a good shooter, and he can get into the painted area. But, if he struggled to finish in college play, he's going to struggle even more to finish in the NBA.

[Asianiac_24]

You look at the playoffs, and you see just how important PGs who have quickness are.

If only Randle was a little bit bigger...at this point, he's probably a good change-of-pace backup PG.

He's a good shooter, and he can get into the painted area. But, if he struggled to finish in college play, he's going to struggle even more to finish in the NBA.

He could always improve his floater. However, he'll never become a Tony Parker in the league. This guy is going to be a good solid backup for a lot of teams in this league, specifically the Lakers

[shangrila]

Wherever he goes, he'll need a system that can cover him defensively. Orlando and LA look like good choices because of their shot blockers.

[Nolan]

He's not a guy thats ever going to be a good defender is league taking his size and lack of speed into acount. But he's a good enough passer and shooter to carve himself out a spot in the league as a solid backup despite his flaws.