Athletic Measurements From ESPN
Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831
Re: Athletic Measurements From ESPN
- PerkinsFor3
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,837
- And1: 1,976
- Joined: Nov 10, 2004
- Contact:
Re: Athletic Measurements From ESPN
I'm still scratching my head as to why Joe Alexander wasnt drafted #1.
Re: Athletic Measurements From ESPN
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 147
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 21, 2005
Re: Athletic Measurements From ESPN
Just scanning through last year's class, the verticals seem far lower this year as a whole. Last year the only player to have a no step vert below 25" was Vasquez. This year there was 11 players.
Re: Athletic Measurements From ESPN
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,011
- And1: 378
- Joined: Jan 18, 2003
Re: Athletic Measurements From ESPN
DraftSpecialist wrote:Just scanning through last year's class, the verticals seem far lower this year as a whole. Last year the only player to have a no step vert below 25" was Vasquez. This year there was 11 players.
It almost makes me wonder if they measured in a different way this year from last year, especially given the three guys who were there both years all declined by 3". That seems like a strange coincidence. Otherwise, everything being equal this year's class simply doesn't jump as well as previous years.
Re: Athletic Measurements From ESPN
- mid-post
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,598
- And1: 70
- Joined: May 06, 2010
- Location: rock-afire explosion
Re: Athletic Measurements From ESPN
Benjammin wrote:DraftSpecialist wrote:Just scanning through last year's class, the verticals seem far lower this year as a whole. Last year the only player to have a no step vert below 25" was Vasquez. This year there was 11 players.
It almost makes me wonder if they measured in a different way this year from last year, especially given the three guys who were there both years all declined by 3". That seems like a strange coincidence. Otherwise, everything being equal this year's class simply doesn't jump as well as previous years.
I think they changed their methodology somehow.