MessiahUjiri wrote:Before you start flaming, hear me out.
As someone who watched both players, I can't help but see the parallels between these two guys.
Both thin framed guys who can handle the ball really well, score with either hand, shoot with confidence, and make terrific passes.
Steph is obviously a better shooter (that's not much of a knock, since Steph is likely the best shooter of all time), but Cameron is actually a better passer.
Steph is taller by 2 inches, but Cameron's wingspan is a massive 6'7. I honestly think that if Cameron was three inches taller (even with the same wingspan) he would be talked about next to D'Angelo and Mudiay.
If you get 75% of Steph Curry, that's still allstar level production. I'd even argue that he can be a better player than Mudiay.
Thoughts?
I made this same argument. I certainly didn't think that before watching a fair amount of Cam Payne. For me, it's the handle. Curry and Payne both just have a way of making everything look smooth, like the ball is an extension of themselves. The BBIQ, the way they create separation, size, steals, vision, floater game, etc.
I am in no way suggesting he will have a comparable career though. Curry is an elite shooter with perfect mechanics. Payne makes a lot of shots with a somewhat broken jumper, he pushes a little and doesn't get enough arc on his shot, it will be much harder for him to adjust to the NBA 3pter. That could be the difference between MVP and career back-up.