Re: Pacers Pick Tracking
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:04 pm
Haliburton needs to play 9 more games, then shutting it down for the playoffs.
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=2349424
God Squad wrote:I went in thinking this pick would be in the 20s..
But now..
LoveMyRaps wrote:God Squad wrote:I went in thinking this pick would be in the 20s..
But now..
Currently 16th..
Slowly and steadily bring it down to 12 :nod:
Fairview4Life wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:God Squad wrote:I went in thinking this pick would be in the 20s..
But now..
Currently 16th..
Slowly and steadily bring it down to 12
Then to 4. Which won't push us to 7, because our pick will be 1.
ConSarnit wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:
Currently 16th..
Slowly and steadily bring it down to 12
Then to 4. Which won't push us to 7, because our pick will be 1.
Pacers jumping to top-4 would screw us in so many ways. There would be a 70% chance it would be top-3 (meaning we lose the pick) and it would almost assuredly knock us out of the top-6. The Pacers jumping in the lottery could mean going from #6 and #14 to ZERO 1sts.
ConSarnit wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:
Currently 16th..
Slowly and steadily bring it down to 12 :nod:
Then to 4. Which won't push us to 7, because our pick will be 1.
Pacers jumping to top-4 would screw us in so many ways. There would be a 70% chance it would be top-3 (meaning we lose the pick) and it would almost assuredly knock us out of the top-6. The Pacers jumping in the lottery could mean going from #6 and #14 to ZERO 1sts.
Fairview4Life wrote:ConSarnit wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:
Then to 4. Which won't push us to 7, because our pick will be 1.
Pacers jumping to top-4 would screw us in so many ways. There would be a 70% chance it would be top-3 (meaning we lose the pick) and it would almost assuredly knock us out of the top-6. The Pacers jumping in the lottery could mean going from #6 and #14 to ZERO 1sts.
I said they will be jumping to 4, not top 4. We will be winning the lottery and picking 1st and 4th.
Fairview4Life wrote:ConSarnit wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:
Then to 4. Which won't push us to 7, because our pick will be 1.
Pacers jumping to top-4 would screw us in so many ways. There would be a 70% chance it would be top-3 (meaning we lose the pick) and it would almost assuredly knock us out of the top-6. The Pacers jumping in the lottery could mean going from #6 and #14 to ZERO 1sts.
I said they will be jumping to 4, not top 4. We will be winning the lottery and picking 1st and 4th.
Son Goku 25 wrote:ConSarnit wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:
Then to 4. Which won't push us to 7, because our pick will be 1.
Pacers jumping to top-4 would screw us in so many ways. There would be a 70% chance it would be top-3 (meaning we lose the pick) and it would almost assuredly knock us out of the top-6. The Pacers jumping in the lottery could mean going from #6 and #14 to ZERO 1sts.
These two responses are of mindsets of Raptor fans pre championship and post championship, two extreme scenarios but for me personally I'm okay with even just getting either one of ours or pacers pick but optimistic we'll get two really good picks plus early 2nd round steal.
Fairview4Life wrote:ConSarnit wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:
Then to 4. Which won't push us to 7, because our pick will be 1.
Pacers jumping to top-4 would screw us in so many ways. There would be a 70% chance it would be top-3 (meaning we lose the pick) and it would almost assuredly knock us out of the top-6. The Pacers jumping in the lottery could mean going from #6 and #14 to ZERO 1sts.
I said they will be jumping to 4, not top 4. We will be winning the lottery and picking 1st and 4th.
mrdressup wrote:It's ironic that sending them our 2nd best player never improved that team.
PD28 wrote:mrdressup wrote:It's ironic that sending them our 2nd best player never improved that team.
They cannot be thrilled to max him out unless they make some noise in the second round.
LoveMyRaps wrote:Who is everyone targeting with the Pacers pick?
I want Ware or Ivisic.