Moderators: Yuri Vaultin, Rhettmatic, Morris_Shatford, darth_federer, DG88, Alfred, 5DOM, YogiStewart, The Duke, j127, itbobby007
by YogiStewart on Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:06 am
tracey_nice wrote:YogiStewart wrote:from what i've been told by an NBA front office employee, there certainly were a LOT of reasons to label him as a headcase. and you do realize that we, the fan, do not have access to the background data that NBA front offices have, right?
the questions about Drummond did not stop at "does he have the motor to play in the NBA?".
what specifically?
didn't get details, but it was made quite clear that there (apparently) were a lot of red flags about him. lots. as is, he was a definite DO NOT WANT player.
i mean, people change and mature and stuff, but some clubs don't want to touch the Spreewells and Arenases and Nate Robinsons of the world. not worth the club's time and energy and not worth screwing up lockerroom chemistry
SwaggWagg wrote:Consider me unblown.
-

YogiStewart
- Community Mod
-
- Posts: 18913
- And1: 151
- Joined: Aug 8, 2007
- Location: Its ALL about Location, Location, Location!
by YogiStewart on Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:10 am
daleface wrote:^ That's what I'm saying.
Some of these GM's didn't due diligence by checking on Drummond. Rather, they based their decision on..or already had formed their opinion on him without really checking.
And that just shows that these GM's haven't been doing a good job.
and i posted that GMs had done more due diligence than you could possibly imagine and there was no way in hell they wanted anything to do with Drummond.
there's lots of stuff out there that plebes like you and I don't get to see or hear about. don't assume that NBA GMs are morons. they may not make moves to your liking, but they didn't BS and fool their way to their position by pulling the wool over dozens, if not hundreds, of college and NBA management staff.
SwaggWagg wrote:Consider me unblown.
-

YogiStewart
- Community Mod
-
- Posts: 18913
- And1: 151
- Joined: Aug 8, 2007
- Location: Its ALL about Location, Location, Location!
by ruckus on Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:25 am
I don't hear this mentioned a lot but, draft position really influences the career progression of a player. Being drafted so low may have been the best thing for Drummond as it may have given him the impetus to actually work on his game and play with some intensity. Who knows if he would have turned out the same way at a higher pick.
It's not an excuse though for BC or for any GM to miss out on talent.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
-

ruckus
- Lead Assistant
-
- Posts: 4696
- And1: 6
- Joined: May 18, 2007
- Location: From the Slums of Shaolin...
by thunderforce on Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:30 am
I know he is not a teen but Acy's per of 21.3 aint so bad either and he can shoot free throws too .
-
thunderforce
- Rookie
-
- Posts: 1219
- And1: 12
- Joined: Mar 3, 2012
by brownbobcat on Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:33 am
YogiStewart wrote:didn't get details, but it was made quite clear that there (apparently) were a lot of red flags about him. lots. as is, he was a definite DO NOT WANT player.
i mean, people change and mature and stuff, but some clubs don't want to touch the Spreewells and Arenases and Nate Robinsons of the world. not worth the club's time and energy and not worth screwing up lockerroom chemistry
This is not a team in a position to reject players of a Sprewell/Arenas calibre for the sake of chemistry. The chemistry of scrubs should never be a concern to anyone, anywhere, ever.
-
brownbobcat
- Sixth Man
-
- Posts: 1579
- And1: 26
- Joined: Jun 8, 2006
by orangutooth on Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:03 am
per is an amazing stat that definitely translates into wins.
Sam wasn't the solution, but he wasn't the problem either
- Harry Palmer
-

orangutooth
- Sixth Man
-
- Posts: 1534
- And1: 5
- Joined: Dec 18, 2007
- Location: dk country
by lucky777s on Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:11 am
YogiStewart wrote:and i posted that GMs had done more due diligence than you could possibly imagine and there was no way in hell they wanted anything to do with Drummond.
there's lots of stuff out there that plebes like you and I don't get to see or hear about. don't assume that NBA GMs are morons. they may not make moves to your liking, but they didn't BS and fool their way to their position
Joe Dumars is a GM. He did his due diligence and realized what a steal Drummond was at 8. So much so that JoeD tried to move up to 8 to get him. He KNEW Raps were not taking Drum but he was very worried about other teams moving up to 8 to get him. Word was that Henson was the guy DET was looking at leading up to the draft. When Drum dropped they jumped at the chance. JoeD owned BC on this one. Did not even have to give up a single asset even though he offered to. Ridiculous.
As for GMs getting their jobs by virtue of accomplishments? That is pure BS. Ex-players get some of those jobs with nothing but their playing ability and personality. Family members get some of those jobs. Guys who start out as interns and network their way within the organization get those jobs. Its a pretty tight circle in the nba and its more who you know than what you know. This is why so many guys just get recycled around the league.
-
lucky777s
- Analyst
-
- Posts: 3615
- And1: 118
- Joined: Jun 20, 2009
by Big Shot on Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:13 am
I believe the teams did their due diligence and passed on the guy. There were many red flags and they decided it was not worth the risk. Chances are they misjudged and placed the wrong bet. Why? If those red flags did exist, they would have showed a bit here and there and we would have heard of them by now. It is not like DET is a veteran team which can conceal all these things.
Having said that, in Toronto's case, I believe JV was the biggest reason why Drum was not even considered as a possible candidate for the pick. If true, I disagree with their decision.
-
Big Shot
- Starter
-
- Posts: 2379
- And1: 47
- Joined: Mar 21, 2002
by peja drobnjak on Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:15 am
due diligence: bc edition
*drafts centre in 2011, is thrilled*
"well i guess we have a centre already" *drafts shooting guard in 2012*
all i ever heard about drummond was that he wasn't intense and played a bit soft, otherwise he was a nice kid. you can't just keep pulling the 'gm's know better' card when you see regular fans day in and day out make better decisions than gm's on less information

Turbo Zone
-
peja drobnjak
- Starter
-
- Posts: 2485
- And1: 37
- Joined: Dec 3, 2011
by Saciid11 on Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:31 am
Big Shot wrote:I believe the teams did their due diligence and passed on the guy. There were many red flags and they decided it was not worth the risk. Chances are they misjudged and placed the wrong bet. Why? If those red flags did exist, they would have showed a bit here and there and we would have heard of them by now. It is not like DET is a veteran team which can seal all these things.
Who cares about other team, this is about Raptors ignoring scouts, fans, etc to pass up yet again a steal that was available to them at 8. This is exactly what he did when he drafted Bargnani, first he used the excuses of not being able to trade down, then he justified by labeling Aldridge a power forward who couldn t play the center position.. while Bargnani was justified as being able to play both positions ... This is exactly what he did here, he passed up Drummond because of his ego, he didnt want his project Bargnani being out performed by rookies and he want JVAL to be out performed too... BC is all about the ego, he has done nothing to improve this team in 7 years. Drummond could have been this teams chance to finally get franchise center, something we never had in 18 years this team existed.
-
Saciid11
- Sixth Man
-
- Posts: 1935
- And1: 2
- Joined: May 21, 2009
by Saciid11 on Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:35 am
This year if we get the #1 or #2 and Shabbazz is available, BC will pass up on him and take instead Cody Zeller... the reason Cody had the character we were looking for and he fits the type of players we like... Shabbazz is just not the player we looking for, besides we have Derozen( decent starter, but he is not difference maker) and Ross( overrated by Raps fans).....
-
Saciid11
- Sixth Man
-
- Posts: 1935
- And1: 2
- Joined: May 21, 2009
by wolfv on Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:36 am
Raps' due dilligence was way off then. He is obviously very high on Jonas, and he was very high on Bargnani as we all know, even saying 13 games is a large sample size. This was the front court he wanted
-
wolfv
- Pro Prospect
-
- Posts: 795
- And1: 21
- Joined: May 10, 2010
by Big Shot on Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:54 am
Saciid11 wrote:Big Shot wrote:I believe the teams did their due diligence and passed on the guy. There were many red flags and they decided it was not worth the risk. Chances are they misjudged and placed the wrong bet. Why? If those red flags did exist, they would have showed a bit here and there and we would have heard of them by now. It is not like DET is a veteran team which can seal all these things.
Who cares about other team, this is about Raptors ignoring scouts, fans, etc to pass up yet again a steal that was available to them at 8. This is exactly what he did when he drafted Bargnani, first he used the excuses of not being able to trade down, then he justified by labeling Aldridge a power forward who couldn t play the center position.. while Bargnani was justified as being able to play both positions ... This is exactly what he did here, he passed up Drummond because of his ego, he didnt want his project Bargnani being out performed by rookies and he want JVAL to be out performed too... BC is all about the ego, he has done nothing to improve this team in 7 years. Drummond could have been this teams chance to finally get franchise center, something we never had in 18 years this team existed.
Hey, I didn't say we should care about what the other teams did, did I? My post was simply to address the other poster's comments regarding Gm's due diligence. If you knew me well, I always thought BC dropped the ball again without picking Drum. I even said before the draft if Drum was available at 8, no way we should pass on him simply based on the talent.
-
Big Shot
- Starter
-
- Posts: 2379
- And1: 47
- Joined: Mar 21, 2002
by hillbilly hare on Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:02 pm
lucky777s wrote:YogiStewart wrote:and i posted that GMs had done more due diligence than you could possibly imagine and there was no way in hell they wanted anything to do with Drummond.
there's lots of stuff out there that plebes like you and I don't get to see or hear about. don't assume that NBA GMs are morons. they may not make moves to your liking, but they didn't BS and fool their way to their position
Joe Dumars is a GM. He did his due diligence and realized what a steal Drummond was at 8. So much so that JoeD tried to move up to 8 to get him. He KNEW Raps were not taking Drum but he was very worried about other teams moving up to 8 to get him. Word was that Henson was the guy DET was looking at leading up to the draft. When Drum dropped they jumped at the chance. JoeD owned BC on this one. Did not even have to give up a single asset even though he offered to. Ridiculous.
As for GMs getting their jobs by virtue of accomplishments? That is pure BS. Ex-players get some of those jobs with nothing but their playing ability and personality. Family members get some of those jobs. Guys who start out as interns and network their way within the organization get those jobs. Its a pretty tight circle in the nba and its more who you know than what you know. This is why so many guys just get recycled around the league.
Exactly. As we've said before.
There are some weak arguments out there regarding Drummond. That "7 other teams passed on him" so there must be reason. That he was a "headcase". That teams "did their due diligence" and found him wanting. And so on. If those assessments are correct, then the only answer is: a lot of people were wrong.
This isn't about getting a guy's talent wrong. It's about worrying about rumors of a guy's character. And in many cases, not checking out those rumors yourself to see if they were true. I don't know exactly where "all" the reports are or where they came from regarding Drummond as a headcase, but I do remember his college coach calling him a great kid who picked things up quickly. So apart from his college coach, who else did GMs interview to conclude that Drummond was a headcase?
More to the point. Joe Dumars interviewed Drummond and worked him out privately, and decided that Drummond was his guy. And he was right. Our GM didn't and wasn't. Dumars did and was. That's really all there is to it.
-

hillbilly hare
- Starter
-
- Posts: 2017
- And1: 67
- Joined: Jan 29, 2011
by Spacing on Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:03 pm
Neutral 123 wrote:YogiStewart wrote:Neutral 123 wrote:The armchair psychologists are the ones who wrote him off as some sort of headcase with obviously no reason for it. This was such a no brainer, and it was obvious that he would be an impact player. The only real question was how long it would take. If the Raps had anything, it was time.
from what i've been told by an NBA front office employee, there certainly were a LOT of reasons to label him as a headcase. and you do realize that we, the fan, do not have access to the background data that NBA front offices have, right?
the questions about Drummond did not stop at "does he have the motor to play in the NBA?".
What exactly? All I've heard is that he struggled with certain drills, and wasn't quick to pick up on stuff generally during workouts. Didn't BC just brag about passing on a top 3 talent because
he didn't think the guy had the right personality, all the while not even working him out? I mean how does a guy still so high on Bargnani, question the mindset of anyone else in the league? But this is far more than Drummond. We can debate on what the Raps shoulda, coulda done, but objectively, the results stink. They have been well below average. There is little reason to think things will be substantially better in the immediate future. Why does this guy (BC) still deserve support? He should have been fired long ago. He's been an objective failure.
It is indeed true that BC was worrisome of his mental make-up.
What worried me the most at the time of the draft was that we were passing on a trade chip to help us move down and secure a player while still taking Ross who was projected in the late teens early twenties IIRC.
It is evidenced that there will always be a team willing to be a trade partner if they feel that said player can have an impact in the NBA. Every scout new Drummond, although raw, did have that ability to impact the game.
He just wasn't "NBA Ready" in comparison to Ross who was deemed "NBA Ready" yet can do nothing outside of Shoot the ball.
According to Bryan though, the ability to shoot a 3 ball far surpasses anything else a player can do on the court.

sanity wrote:I think this team might be the only team in history to ever be concerned about a Luke Walton specific matchup.
-

Spacing
- Bench Warmer
-
- Posts: 1446
- And1: 71
- Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Return to Toronto Raptors
Users browsing this forum: BD006, blastttOFF, booyah_child, CeltsfanSinceBirth, DemarDerozan, gerrit4, gp2015, Indeed, Jatt, kem416, N1QUE24, Ong_dynasty, orbesnet, Patman, Pchu, Rapsrbake, Raptolicism, RomaniaLuvTR, RotR, shawn unkempt, Stills12, Wasp, wolfv, YoungD23, Zuul