team edward wrote:From OKC's perspective, going into the tax early to pay Caron Butler would be pure idiocy. Perhaps not paying Harden was a questionable call, but you could go either way - he's a "ball in his hands" kind of guy, and they already have two of those guys that are (arguably) better at it.
The Spurs are the only good model for sustained success - OKC needs to find some diamonds in the rough, to develop their rookie deal players and to find some roleplayers overseas or on vet minimum deals. The presence of Kevin Durant does not mean everybody on the roster deserves to get overpaid.
Never advocated retaining the services of an aging and now lackluster Butler; Harden, on the other hand, is a whole different matter.
Your claim that Westbrook and Durant are ball dominant is valid, but Harden was punishing 2nd unit personnel during his tenure w/ the Thunder - when he closed games w/ Westbrook and Durant, he deferred, but remained a viable and potent option.
If you've spent much time watching the Thunder post Harden, a big lead courtesy of the starting 5 isn't guaranteed to be sustained when the 2nd unit is on the floor - it's why when 15 + leads ebb to around 10 (more often than not) or so, Brooks usually motions for Durant and Westbrook to re-enter the game from the bench - other than Jackson (who truly excels mostly against inferior competition), the offense DIES w/o those 2 on the court. They've struggled to replace Harden w/ the likes of Lamb brilliant on 1 night out of 10-15.
Given Brooks's myopic penchant for an iso heavy offense, having 3 certifiable scoring threats vis-a-vis Durant, Harden, and Westbrook proved to be far more effective than as currently assembled; the fact that the team marched to the Western Conference championship w/ Harden as an integral component, but has scuffled since his departure can't be absolutely ascribed to mere pure coincidence.
Legitimate title contender (w/ Harden) window versus not paying the luxury tax/receiving more monies - it's clear where the ownership stands (despite, as aforementioned, having considerable capital).