Tdot1 wrote:RealRapsFan wrote:Tdot1 wrote:
Nice stats... What teams were all those games against without Demar??? Not hard to be in the + when you play knicks x2, pacers, magic, nets etc.
Those stats were against all different teams the would have played over those minutes.
Also not hard to be in the + when you play Philly, OKC without Durant/Westbrook, and Orl x2
Whats your point?
Oh if it matters at all, more than half of Demar's positive net rating comes from 2 games. I repeat, 2 games. Orlando and Milwaukee. Over 80% of it from 5 games (Orlando, Milwaukee, Utah, Philly, Washington)
So... you were saying opposition matters? Sure does......
Its really simple bud. Look at teams we have beaten with Demar. Cavs, Grizzlies, Suns, Hawks x2, Wizards. Now tell me some above .500 teams we have beaten without Demar??? Oh yes again that's right you can't.
/Thread.
You argument is pretty flawed. Those teams we played early has improved both of the ORtg and DRtg. Look at Atlanta, their games improved as they go against other strong teams, which means their previous struggle was not because of one individual team, but their own performance. Unless you can prove those top teams are playing great against all other teams, and not playing great against us alone, otherwise, the factor seems to be themselves.
