thunderforce wrote:Masai was brought here to rebuild and he should get a chance to do it .
he had his chance to, but turned it down.
Moderators: HiJiNX, niQ, Morris_Shatford, DG88, Reeko, lebron stopper, 7 Footer, Duffman100
thunderforce wrote:Masai was brought here to rebuild and he should get a chance to do it .
grumpwalter wrote:thunderforce wrote:Masai was brought here to rebuild and he should get a chance to do it .
he had his chance to, but turned it down.
grumpwalter wrote:thunderforce wrote:Masai was brought here to rebuild and he should get a chance to do it .
he had his chance to, but turned it down.
thunderforce wrote:grumpwalter wrote:thunderforce wrote:Masai was brought here to rebuild and he should get a chance to do it .
he had his chance to, but turned it down.
True but the way the team was playing then , he really could not blow it up at that time , but now he can .
thunderforce wrote:Masai was brought here to rebuild and he should get a chance to do it .
Iamtheliquor wrote:Financials wrote:Iamtheliquor wrote:Masai is not the problem. Lets see what he does this off-season with a pick in the 20's where he has historically drafted good players for that range (Faried, Fournier). Maybe he brings in a coach of his choosing, and the cap is projected to go up. Plus, maybe he pulls off another great trade. Remember how he fleeced NYK for Bargnanai, let alone the Gay trade that gave us an entire bench? Give him time. And if this core doesn't work out I want Masai leading the rebuild.
hahahahaha people still give MU credit for the Rudy Gay trade.
he himself said it went the opposite way of his plan ... he had no idea that would occur, he wanted to blow it up...
again - the same fans who say this now probably were up in arms when rudy was traded for vasquez ppat chuck and salmons.
I do give him credit as it wasn't even a year and a half ago. Plus it led to 48 and 49 wins. I'm not happy with how this season has turned out in the final months and playoffs, but Masai has at least started something good here and that's why I support him and am excited to see what he does in the off-season.
theaub wrote:If tanking guaranteed Wiggins, Masai would've tanked
Tanking in no way, shape or form would have come close to guaranteeing Wiggins
Financials wrote:Iamtheliquor wrote:Financials wrote:
hahahahaha people still give MU credit for the Rudy Gay trade.
he himself said it went the opposite way of his plan ... he had no idea that would occur, he wanted to blow it up...
again - the same fans who say this now probably were up in arms when rudy was traded for vasquez ppat chuck and salmons.
I do give him credit as it wasn't even a year and a half ago. Plus it led to 48 and 49 wins. I'm not happy with how this season has turned out in the final months and playoffs, but Masai has at least started something good here and that's why I support him and am excited to see what he does in the off-season.
So if something completely lucky (and actually completely opposite of what the gm expected) happens, its okay to give them full credit for it because it happened recently? What the **** kind of logic are you spittin.
As I said, he had no intention of us getting better with that trade, and what we got in return was a surprise to MU aswell as the fanbase. Hell, he continued to try to dismantle the other pieces even after the team went hot because he still knew it was luck..
Masai didn't start anything good. The team of misfits and players with no home (many whom needed deals) decided to turn up and play for pride, and they went on a hot streak. Now they all have deals, all have a year together, and that mojo is gone.
The honeymoon is over, the lucky dice ran dry.. Time to switch it up.
Iamtheliquor wrote:Financials wrote:Iamtheliquor wrote:
I do give him credit as it wasn't even a year and a half ago. Plus it led to 48 and 49 wins. I'm not happy with how this season has turned out in the final months and playoffs, but Masai has at least started something good here and that's why I support him and am excited to see what he does in the off-season.
So if something completely lucky (and actually completely opposite of what the gm expected) happens, its okay to give them full credit for it because it happened recently? What the **** kind of logic are you spittin.
As I said, he had no intention of us getting better with that trade, and what we got in return was a surprise to MU aswell as the fanbase. Hell, he continued to try to dismantle the other pieces even after the team went hot because he still knew it was luck..
Masai didn't start anything good. The team of misfits and players with no home (many whom needed deals) decided to turn up and play for pride, and they went on a hot streak. Now they all have deals, all have a year together, and that mojo is gone.
The honeymoon is over, the lucky dice ran dry.. Time to switch it up.
Luck plays a part in this game as in many things. Yes you're right, the intention behind the Gay trade wasn't to get to 48 wins. But a fortunate accident happened and here we are 48 and 49 wins later. So yes he has started something good here and he deserves some credit for that. The players like one another and this city, which has often not been the case as we all too well know.
Serious question, do you want him fired? If not what do you want from him this off-season?
BoyzNTheHood wrote:I apologize, I have incredibly small genitalia
Iamtheliquor wrote:Financials wrote:Iamtheliquor wrote:
I do give him credit as it wasn't even a year and a half ago. Plus it led to 48 and 49 wins. I'm not happy with how this season has turned out in the final months and playoffs, but Masai has at least started something good here and that's why I support him and am excited to see what he does in the off-season.
So if something completely lucky (and actually completely opposite of what the gm expected) happens, its okay to give them full credit for it because it happened recently? What the **** kind of logic are you spittin.
As I said, he had no intention of us getting better with that trade, and what we got in return was a surprise to MU aswell as the fanbase. Hell, he continued to try to dismantle the other pieces even after the team went hot because he still knew it was luck..
Masai didn't start anything good. The team of misfits and players with no home (many whom needed deals) decided to turn up and play for pride, and they went on a hot streak. Now they all have deals, all have a year together, and that mojo is gone.
The honeymoon is over, the lucky dice ran dry.. Time to switch it up.
Luck plays a part in this game as in many things. Yes you're right, the intention behind the Gay trade wasn't to get to 48 wins. But a fortunate accident happened and here we are 48 and 49 wins later. So yes he has started something good here and he deserves some credit for that. The players like one another and this city, which has often not been the case as we all too well know.
Serious question, do you want him fired? If not what do you want from him this off-season?
grumpwalter wrote:RedX wrote:grumpwalter wrote:
Isn't that what he's supposed to evaluate?
Sure, and he got the 6th man of the year. Pretty good risk to reward if you ask me. He improved our bench by trading a nobody for a somebody. I would argue that Lou isn't the issue this season, I point fingers at GV, Jonas has looked quite bad, Ross hasn't jumped as much as we had hoped for, and our coach can't run an offence or sustain a defence. Lou is the least of our problems, he at least did the job he was brought in to do.
I think some of you just need to hate something, anything. A steady beam of distaste that just needs a target. Sorry to say that MU isn't the one you should be pointing fingers at. In fact, we should be thankful to have him to clean up the issues this team is having, he's the best man for the job.
let's see if he is actually able to clean up the issue though, it depends if a no-brainer trade comes up, since that's all he's done since he's come here.
RedX wrote:grumpwalter wrote:RedX wrote:
Sure, and he got the 6th man of the year. Pretty good risk to reward if you ask me. He improved our bench by trading a nobody for a somebody. I would argue that Lou isn't the issue this season, I point fingers at GV, Jonas has looked quite bad, Ross hasn't jumped as much as we had hoped for, and our coach can't run an offence or sustain a defence. Lou is the least of our problems, he at least did the job he was brought in to do.
I think some of you just need to hate something, anything. A steady beam of distaste that just needs a target. Sorry to say that MU isn't the one you should be pointing fingers at. In fact, we should be thankful to have him to clean up the issues this team is having, he's the best man for the job.
let's see if he is actually able to clean up the issue though, it depends if a no-brainer trade comes up, since that's all he's done since he's come here.
You speak as though trading Rudy for a better bench was a given — no, it was a tanking move that worked out differently than expected and made us better. Salmons for Lou was more or less an experiment that again worked out probably beyond what MU hoped for. He traded Bargnani for a PICK and whatever else.
None of those things are no-brainer trades... Even getting some of those trades to even be possible is impressive, and none of the players we got from them were clear-cut obvious moves for us to make, none.
Inevitable wrote:Geddy is a good mod actually
BoyzNTheHood wrote:I apologize, I have incredibly small genitalia
grumpwalter wrote:RedX wrote:grumpwalter wrote:
let's see if he is actually able to clean up the issue though, it depends if a no-brainer trade comes up, since that's all he's done since he's come here.
You speak as though trading Rudy for a better bench was a given — no, it was a tanking move that worked out differently than expected and made us better. Salmons for Lou was more or less an experiment that again worked out probably beyond what MU hoped for. He traded Bargnani for a PICK and whatever else.
None of those things are no-brainer trades... Even getting some of those trades to even be possible is impressive, and none of the players we got from them were clear-cut obvious moves for us to make, none.
with the Bargnani trade, he put a bum on the market, see if anyone wants him, luckily, someone did, like I said, if David Kahn put Bargnani on the market and someone took the offer (and like I said before, ripping off Dolan is not exactly rocket science), any GM looking to tank would have done the Rudy trade too, as for Lou, he was originally just a salary dump.