2023-24 Season: Draft, Trades, and FA Ideas Thread V3.0
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 3:40 pm
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=2366732
CazOnReal wrote:Well...with Porter possibly out of the NBA, I think we'll need to take a serious look at drafting a 4/5 with one of our picks.
CazOnReal wrote:Well...with Porter possibly out of the NBA, I think we'll need to take a serious look at drafting a 4/5 with one of our picks.
ishoy123 wrote:CazOnReal wrote:Well...with Porter possibly out of the NBA, I think we'll need to take a serious look at drafting a 4/5 with one of our picks.
Even before the gambling stuff, Porter was never a core part of the plans going forward.
Psubs wrote:CazOnReal wrote:Well...with Porter possibly out of the NBA, I think we'll need to take a serious look at drafting a 4/5 with one of our picks.
That was always the case and I was looking at Ware or Tyler Smith with the Pacers pick and Edey or Ivisic with the #31.
Oakvillehoops wrote:What combination of Jacob Poetl + Picks and more could get Sengun from Houston?
They’ve won 10 in a row now without him playing, and Green is popping off again. Sengun is an amazing player but probably a bad fit with Green.
I think Senguns passing and vision with Scottie’s vision and RJs slashing would be an amazing fit
CazOnReal wrote:Well...with Porter possibly out of the NBA, I think we'll need to take a serious look at drafting a 4/5 with one of our picks.
raptorforlife88 wrote:If we choose to go this route, what is a bad contract that we can absorb for assets? Lonzo? Terry Rozier?
Saul Goodman wrote:raptorforlife88 wrote:If we choose to go this route, what is a bad contract that we can absorb for assets? Lonzo? Terry Rozier?
Wiggins would be a good move
Wiggins/2025 GSW 1st for cap room would be a good deal
Saul Goodman wrote:raptorforlife88 wrote:If we choose to go this route, what is a bad contract that we can absorb for assets? Lonzo? Terry Rozier?
Wiggins would be a good move
Wiggins/2025 GSW 1st for cap room would be a good deal
CazOnReal wrote:Saul Goodman wrote:raptorforlife88 wrote:If we choose to go this route, what is a bad contract that we can absorb for assets? Lonzo? Terry Rozier?
Wiggins would be a good move
Wiggins/2025 GSW 1st for cap room would be a good deal
2 problems with that:
1) Because Dubs owe a 24 first to the Blazers, they can't trade their 25 pick; I think they should be able to trade a 26 first but...
2) Salary matching would more or less eliminate the Raptors cap space and thus any opportunities for free agent signings; Boucher would need to be included for matching purposes so at least that would free up a roster slot for the team
I think if the Raptors are going to take on any bad salary, it would probably be Lonzo (Blazers 1st or a trade up for the Bulls 1st this year with the Pacers 1st) or Poole though frankly the Wizards shouldn't be moving any draft capital given they're going to be stuck in a rebuild for a longggggggg time. Poole might not even be on his current contract by the time Washington makes their next playoff appearance.
ArthurVandelay wrote:CazOnReal wrote:Saul Goodman wrote:
Wiggins would be a good move
Wiggins/2025 GSW 1st for cap room would be a good deal
2 problems with that:
1) Because Dubs owe a 24 first to the Blazers, they can't trade their 25 pick; I think they should be able to trade a 26 first but...
2) Salary matching would more or less eliminate the Raptors cap space and thus any opportunities for free agent signings; Boucher would need to be included for matching purposes so at least that would free up a roster slot for the team
I think if the Raptors are going to take on any bad salary, it would probably be Lonzo (Blazers 1st or a trade up for the Bulls 1st this year with the Pacers 1st) or Poole though frankly the Wizards shouldn't be moving any draft capital given they're going to be stuck in a rebuild for a longggggggg time. Poole might not even be on his current contract by the time Washington makes their next playoff appearance.
Warriors can trade 25 pick draft night as soon as their 24 pick is selected.
I’d take Wiggins if another asset came back - ‘25 first would be ideal. Wouldn’t touch Poole without a lot of draft capital which Wizards don’t have. Poole is hands down the most toxic contract in the nba.
agkagk wrote:ArthurVandelay wrote:CazOnReal wrote:2 problems with that:
1) Because Dubs owe a 24 first to the Blazers, they can't trade their 25 pick; I think they should be able to trade a 26 first but...
2) Salary matching would more or less eliminate the Raptors cap space and thus any opportunities for free agent signings; Boucher would need to be included for matching purposes so at least that would free up a roster slot for the team
I think if the Raptors are going to take on any bad salary, it would probably be Lonzo (Blazers 1st or a trade up for the Bulls 1st this year with the Pacers 1st) or Poole though frankly the Wizards shouldn't be moving any draft capital given they're going to be stuck in a rebuild for a longggggggg time. Poole might not even be on his current contract by the time Washington makes their next playoff appearance.
Warriors can trade 25 pick draft night as soon as their 24 pick is selected.
I’d take Wiggins if another asset came back - ‘25 first would be ideal. Wouldn’t touch Poole without a lot of draft capital which Wizards don’t have. Poole is hands down the most toxic contract in the nba.
Yall missed the boat on wiggins.
He was dealing with a personal matter and his 2024 numbers and performance are inline with what youd expect.
Doubt he was ever really avaiable
ishoy123 wrote:agkagk wrote:ArthurVandelay wrote:
Warriors can trade 25 pick draft night as soon as their 24 pick is selected.
I’d take Wiggins if another asset came back - ‘25 first would be ideal. Wouldn’t touch Poole without a lot of draft capital which Wizards don’t have. Poole is hands down the most toxic contract in the nba.
Yall missed the boat on wiggins.
He was dealing with a personal matter and his 2024 numbers and performance are inline with what youd expect.
Doubt he was ever really avaiable
The whole point of doing all the trades this year is so we don't end up with a contract like Wiggins.
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:Poeltl and 17 for Kennard and Grizz pick
Regardless of if we get our own or not we take Clingon with the Grizz pick (assuming no Sarr). Use BB and Gary to get another first and draft a wing and/or another pg
ishoy123 wrote:agkagk wrote:ArthurVandelay wrote:
Warriors can trade 25 pick draft night as soon as their 24 pick is selected.
I’d take Wiggins if another asset came back - ‘25 first would be ideal. Wouldn’t touch Poole without a lot of draft capital which Wizards don’t have. Poole is hands down the most toxic contract in the nba.
Yall missed the boat on wiggins.
He was dealing with a personal matter and his 2024 numbers and performance are inline with what youd expect.
Doubt he was ever really avaiable
The whole point of doing all the trades this year is so we don't end up with a contract like Wiggins.
islandboy53 wrote:ishoy123 wrote:agkagk wrote:
Yall missed the boat on wiggins.
He was dealing with a personal matter and his 2024 numbers and performance are inline with what youd expect.
Doubt he was ever really avaiable
The whole point of doing all the trades this year is so we don't end up with a contract like Wiggins.
Thank you.