Inigo Montoya wrote:I wonder where did you get the idea I said Chalmers or Udrih were better than Mack. But we know they were available earlier and for a decent price because we saw what it cost to get either.
The Jazz had a hole at PG all season long, and it was obvious that's going to be the case once Exum went down. The problem with the FO is that they did nothing. If they wanted Mack, they could have gotten him much sooner. There was no time in his career he wasn't available. Chalmers and Udrih are examples of solutions to the PG position that could have been had early into the season. Had the Jazz gotten a competent PG from the start or at least earlier in the year, then they would have been in a much better position to make the playoffs. Instead they waited until the last minute of the deadline to get Mack, who they could have gotten much earlier. They didn't, because they didn't commit to either course of action. Like you (?) said - they were cool making the playoffs and cool with missing it.
If you listen to Locke, and believe what he has said, this is actually not true. Locke said, and I have no reason not to believe him, that the deal for Mack was contingent on any trades for Teague or Schroeder. So, Mack wasn't available until any of the trades for those guys fell through. Hence the fact that it was the end of the trade deadline.
Could Locke have been lying? I guess, but he said this in passing in one of his discussions, so I find it's probably reliable.