bondom34 wrote:spearsy23 wrote:bondom34 wrote:Problem is that when he got that contract, everyone loved it. Yeah in retrospect it was a mistake, but not really at the time.
Nah, nobody loved the contract at the time. He hadn't even suited up for us yet and Boston had been offering him around 5.5 million per year. It wasn't viewed as the colossal mistake it ended up being, but it was already a slight overpay. Fwiw here's the DT's take on itThe $35 million is probably more than Perkins’ was going to find in the open market this summer, especially with the uncertainty of the new CBA. But that’s not a massive price tag for the Thunder to pay to their starting center for the next five years.
It was a minor mistake that ended up costing the franchise an MVP caliber player. But the real point is that even if you only view it as a small mistake it's still one that probably kept us from having at least a championship by now. And I don't buy that you can't use hindsight to judge a move. Ultimately we judge gm's on what they accomplish, otherwise the only moves you can ever criticize are the absolute dumbest Billy king moves.
Darn it, I'm just ready to leave work, but Id really recommend looking back on this board when perk was extended. The contract was really really loved. I found the thread a few weeks back and can't right at the moment. Pretty sure slick created it back then. It was certainly a loved deal at the time.
Edit:
viewtopic.php?f=334&t=1142974
Found it.
That's many months after the fact and in the afterglow of a conference final appearance that was never supposed to happen. Also a really flawed premise because all of the players mentioned were better than Perkins then as well as moving forward. The general consensus was always that it was a slight overpay (actually ended up being a lot worse than that of course), even Slick's post says
at the time a lot of fans thought it was premature