"Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 1.Ness 2.Spree 3.Klove

Moderators: Snakebites, MadNESS, Fadeaway_J

damecurry
General Manager
Posts: 9,300
And1: 1,517
Joined: May 19, 2014
 

"Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 1.Ness 2.Spree 3.Klove 

Post#1 » by damecurry » Sun Jul 27, 2014 3:08 pm

1st: Bucks (221) :clap:

2nd: Bulls (187)
3rd: OKC (161)
4th: 76ers (137)
5th: Heat (100)

6th: Wolves (83)
7th: Hawks (62)
8th: Kings (58)
9th: Cavs (52)
10th: Hornets/Spurs (45 each)

11th: Pelicans (44)
12th: Blazers (40)
13th: Knicks/Warriors (31 each)
14th: Lakers (28)
15th: Pacers (26)

16th: Rockets (24)
17th: Grizzlies (22)
18th: Celtics (17)
19th: Jazz (9)
20th: Mavs (5)

21st: Magic/Pistons (4 each)
User avatar
goober
GOTB's Cancun
Posts: 13,907
And1: 5,957
Joined: Jun 09, 2014
     

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#2 » by goober » Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:52 pm

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. Bucks
2. Heat
3. Kings
4. Pacers
5. 76ers
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. Thunder
2. Bulls
3. Mavs
4. Cavs
5. Lakers
Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. Bucks
2. OKC
3. Kings
4. 76ers
5. Bulls
Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1.Bucks
2. OKC
3. 76ers
4. Kings
5. Bulls
6. TWolves
7. GS
8. Pacers
9. Rockets
10. Heat
BEST ROSTER PAGE: Bulls that 2k stuff was sweet
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 13,748
And1: 5,696
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#3 » by spree8 » Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:55 pm

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)

1. Heat
2. Bucks
3. Wolves
4. 76ers
5. Blazers


Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)

1. Thunder
2. Kings
3. Grizzlies
4. Cavs
5. Celtics


Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-efficient?)

1. Thunder
2. Heat
3. Bucks
4. Magic
5. Grizzlies


Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)

1. Bucks- had a lot less to trade now than you did last game (Rondo, #6, #17, Sully, Olynyk)
2. Thunder- built a sick young team out of KD and Ibaka
3. Wolves- I like this team around Dwight....a better version of that 09' Finals Magic team.
4. Heat- good value retaining the big 3, and a good move finally getting them a legit center.
5. Hawks- like the re-uniting of the champion Gator boys, and the addition of Gordy.
6.76ers- DRose, MGasol, Big AL...real nice big 3 no doubt.
7. Kings- love the addition of LMA...with Rudy & Cousins they're legit.
8. Blazers- sweet defensive squad. Wade, JSmith, Batum, Gibson is a tough bunch.
9. Lakers- a fan of the Lopez bros back together and the addition of Teague.
10. Cavs- would be a fun team to watch for sure. Especially if Towns pans out.


Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.

1. Kings



- Chuck, I hate you for trading Rubio lol. I thought your team was awesome before that. Rubio, Mayo, Parsons, ADavis, Vucevic...that's badass bro!

-Also, I only ranked teams who did write-ups like most people who did rankings seemed to do here...sucks because there was some real good teams that didn't do them. I know Chris had some family issues (I had a death in the fam myself mid-game) and felt compelled to rank him regardless because of the circumstances, and since he did a nice job, but wasn't sure if it was cool or not. If it's any consolation, I would've had you in a few of the top ranks here.
GMAT Knicks :king:

Luka Dončić
Jamal Murray
Donte DiVincenzo
RJ Barrett
Joel Embiid
damecurry
General Manager
Posts: 9,300
And1: 1,517
Joined: May 19, 2014
 

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#4 » by damecurry » Sun Jul 27, 2014 6:45 pm

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. Bucks
2. Heat
3. 76ers
4. Blazers
5. Warriors
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. Thunder
2. Bulls
3. Grizzlies
4. Celtics
5. Cavaliers
Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. Hornets
2. Heat
3. Spurs
4. T-Wolves
5. Lakers
Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. Bucks
2. Thunder
3. Bulls
4. Pacers
5. 76ers
6. Heat
7. T-Wolves
8. Blazers
9. Warriors
10. Pacers
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.

1. Bulls
User avatar
Hawk Eye
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,819
And1: 2,071
Joined: May 28, 2014

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#5 » by Hawk Eye » Sun Jul 27, 2014 7:09 pm

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. Heat
2. Bucks
3. 76ers
4. Warriors
5. Knicks
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. Thunder
2. Bulls
3. Pistons
4. Celtics
5. Cavaliers
Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. Hornets
2. Heat
3. Knicks
4. T-Wolves
5. Lakers
Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. Heat
2. Bucks
3. Thunder
4. Knicks
5. 76ers
6. Bulls
7. T-Wolves
8. Jazz
9. Warriors
10. Pistons
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.

1. Bulls
MadNESS
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 19,624
And1: 3,675
Joined: Jun 29, 2008
Location: Wisco
Contact:
     

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#6 » by MadNESS » Sun Jul 27, 2014 11:28 pm

Milwaukee Bucks

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. MIA
2. PHI
3. ATL
4. SAS
5. SAC
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. OKC
2. CHI
3. CHA
4. CLE
5. NOP
Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. ATL
2. CLE
3. SAS
4. OKC
5. CHI
Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. CHI
2. PHI
3. OKC
4. SAS
5. ATL
6. MIN
7. MEM
8. CHA
9. NOP
10. POR
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.
1. LAL / SAC
LAKESHOW
Zion Wembanyama
RealGM
Posts: 12,583
And1: 3,304
Joined: Mar 31, 2012
         

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#7 » by Zion Wembanyama » Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:28 am

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. PHI
2. MIL
3. MIN
4. MIA
5. LAL
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. NOP
2. CHI
3. OKC
4. CLE
5. BOS
Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. MIA
2. ATL
3. MIN
4. LAL
5. MEM
Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. MIL
2. MIA
3. PHI
4. CHI
5. MIN
6. CLE
7. LAL
8. CHA
9. BOS
10. MEM
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.
1. CHI
NBA - Pelicans,Hornets
NFL - Panthers
MLB - Braves
NHL - Ducks, Hurricanes
NCAAB - Tarheels, Wolverines, CHA 49ers
NCAAF - Tarheels, Wolverines, CHA 49ers
Soccer - PSG, CLT FC, USMNT, FRA, SCO
Golf - Tiger Woods
Tennis - Rafael Nadal
NASCAR - Joey Lagano
RR9
Starter
Posts: 2,461
And1: 157
Joined: Jul 14, 2011
       

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#8 » by RR9 » Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:49 pm

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. SAS
2. PHI
3. MIL
4. ATL
5. MIA
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. MIL
2. CHI
3. NOP
4. OKC
5. CHA
Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. MIL
2. CHI
3. ATL
4. PHI
5. HOU
Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. MIL
2. PHI
3. CHI
4. ATL
5. NOP
6. SAS
7. OKC
8. SAC
9. ORL
10. MEM
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.
1. CHI
User avatar
Blazer50
Head Coach
Posts: 6,014
And1: 759
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
       

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#9 » by Blazer50 » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:33 pm

I do think Orlando is getting hosed in no win now or future mentions, but that's pretty par for the course. We were at least very active with lots of our guys on successful rosters.

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. MILW
2. PORTLAND
3. ATL
4. SACRAMENTO
5. MIAMI OR SAS - Neither did enough in the game - but the rosters merit win now consideration, Klove retained the Big 3 inheriting the team At Free agency and did not deserve to keep the guys since neither he nor Miami had done anything to that point. It was a gift and I don't mean to offend Klove, but no max offer and he did not have the team to shape to get cap space, etc. A lot of GMs had legit runs at the Big 3. And SAS is did very little - may have been the wise move - but I won't reward them higher than the tie for 5th.


Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. OKC
2. Cleveland
3. CHI
4. Charlotte
5. BOS - seem to have lost focus - Pretty common in the game - I do think FA took it's toll here!


Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. MILW
2. OKC
3. CLE
4. CHA
5. CHI

Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1.Bucks
2. OKC
3. Phi
4. Kings
5. Hawks
6. CHA - You can't just proclaim Afflalo a PG - A little effort in that area would have move you up considerably.
7. TWolves
8. Golden State
9. Pacers
10. Rockets

Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.
1. CHI
User avatar
DK-All Day
General Manager
Posts: 9,629
And1: 8,327
Joined: Oct 12, 2013
       

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#10 » by DK-All Day » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:49 pm

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. SAS
2. MIA
3. MIL
4. SAC
5. ATL
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. OKC
2. LAL
3. CHI
4. NOP
5. CLE
Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. OKC
2. CHI
3. MIL
4. LAL
5. CLE
Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. MIL
2. MIA
3. OKC
4. CHI
5. MIN
6. MEM
7. NOP
8. CHA
9. LAL
10. POR
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.
1. CHI

-Sixers
Handsome.
Warriorfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,014
And1: 2,684
Joined: Jun 24, 2001
         

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#11 » by Warriorfan » Mon Jul 28, 2014 10:40 pm

Memphis

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. Mil
2. Chi
3. GS
4. Dal
5. NY
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. Mil
2. NY
3. Port
4. Chi
5. GS
Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. Mil
2. Sac
3. Chi
4. GS
5. Port
Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. Mil
2. Port
3. NY
4. GS
5. Utah
6. Atl
7. SAS
8. LAC
9. Mia
10. Chi
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.

Vhi
User avatar
Ralnor
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 6,297
And1: 544
Joined: Dec 31, 2013
Location: Orlando, Florida
     

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#12 » by Ralnor » Tue Jul 29, 2014 3:18 am


Win-Now
- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. Philly
2. Kings
3. Spurs
4. Bucks
5. Minny
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. Chicago
2. Philly
3. Cavs
4. Kings
5. Pelicans
Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s surprisingly cost-efficient?)
1. Bulls
2. Pelicans
3. Spurs
4. Philly
5. Grizzlies
Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. Philly
2. Chicago
3. Atlanta
4. Minny
5. Pelicans
6. Nets
7. Kings
8. Bucks
9. Boston
10. Cleveland
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.
1. Chicago
damecurry
General Manager
Posts: 9,300
And1: 1,517
Joined: May 19, 2014
 

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#13 » by damecurry » Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:49 am

Hey GMs,
sorry for kinda disappearing. Apparently RR9 is starting signups for his game tomorrow at midnight (about 23 hours from now) so I'm gonna leave this open till 5pm EST tomorrow (tuesday) Then I'll compile as quickly as possible and still have a winner well before the next game sign-ups start. So if you haven't gotten your rankings up please do so.
ace625214
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,463
And1: 604
Joined: May 31, 2014

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#14 » by ace625214 » Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:59 pm

Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. Philly
2. Milwaukee
3. Minnesota
4. Miami
5. Washington
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. Cleveland
2. New Orleans
3. OKC
4. Atlanta
5. Boston

Chicago likely would have been near the top of this, but when you post your entire roster in images only, I can't view them at work. I have no idea what your full depth chart is. Take 45 seconds and type the damn names out.

Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. Portland
2. Charlotte
3. OKC
4. Memphis
5. Miami

If you didn't put your salary info in your write-up, you didn't get on this list. It's not hard to copy/paste your final cap number.

Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. Minnesota
2. Milwaukee
3. Cleveland
4. Portland
5. New Orleans
6. Philly
7. Charlotte
8. Miami
9. Boston
10. Atlanta
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.
1. Cleveland. Nice clean logo at the top that catches your eye. Clear salary info. No stupid pictures or links to google docs that make it a nightmare to look at on mobile and at work.
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 13,748
And1: 5,696
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#15 » by spree8 » Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:32 pm

ace625214 wrote:Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. Philly
2. Milwaukee
3. Minnesota
4. Miami
5. Washington
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. Cleveland
2. New Orleans
3. OKC
4. Atlanta
5. Boston

Chicago likely would have been near the top of this, but when you post your entire roster in images only, I can't view them at work. I have no idea what your full depth chart is. Take 45 seconds and type the damn names out.

Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. Portland
2. Charlotte
3. OKC
4. Memphis
5. Miami

If you didn't put your salary info in your write-up, you didn't get on this list. It's not hard to copy/paste your final cap number.

Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. Minnesota
2. Milwaukee
3. Cleveland
4. Portland
5. New Orleans
6. Philly
7. Charlotte
8. Miami
9. Boston
10. Atlanta
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.
1. Cleveland. Nice clean logo at the top that catches your eye. Clear salary info. No stupid pictures or links to google docs that make it a nightmare to look at on mobile and at work.



This isn't necessary dude. Getting pissed at me because you are the only one in this game who can't view an image (at your job) of my roster is silly. I don't even know how that's possible, and why you didn't take the 45 seconds to look at it when you got home to a better device. Leaving me off of every category because of this...unbelievable. :roll:
GMAT Knicks :king:

Luka Dončić
Jamal Murray
Donte DiVincenzo
RJ Barrett
Joel Embiid
RR9
Starter
Posts: 2,461
And1: 157
Joined: Jul 14, 2011
       

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#16 » by RR9 » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:11 pm

ace625214 wrote:Win-Now- (Team most prepared to currently win games, please keep in mind fit, depth, schemes and play style as well as “star-power”)
1. Philly
2. Milwaukee
3. Minnesota
4. Miami
5. Washington
Win-Future- (You may apply your own time-line, but the teams most likely to win down the line, whether it’s two years, five years, the better part of a decade, if all teams stayed about the same who would be best later on?)
1. Cleveland
2. New Orleans
3. OKC
4. Atlanta
5. Boston

Chicago likely would have been near the top of this, but when you post your entire roster in images only, I can't view them at work. I have no idea what your full depth chart is. Take 45 seconds and type the damn names out.

Best Value- (Some rosters may look great at surface level but cost far more than they’re worth, who has a good, winning team that’s suprisingly cost-effecient?)
1. Portland
2. Charlotte
3. OKC
4. Memphis
5. Miami

If you didn't put your salary info in your write-up, you didn't get on this list. It's not hard to copy/paste your final cap number.

Best Overall Job- (It’s not supposed to be just who started with nothing and turned it into something, this is everything, winning now, in the future, for good value and improving the roster whether that means adding the right pieces to keep the heat or spurs at championship caliber or completely rebuilding a team that just wasn’t quite good enough, whomever you thought did the best job with what they had, rank em highest here.)
1. Minnesota
2. Milwaukee
3. Cleveland
4. Portland
5. New Orleans
6. Philly
7. Charlotte
8. Miami
9. Boston
10. Atlanta
Best Roster Page-Which page looks the best, has the most creative and cool features, is sleek, you know what, it's completely subjective. Whatever you think qualifies the best roster page overall.
1. Cleveland. Nice clean logo at the top that catches your eye. Clear salary info. No stupid pictures or links to google docs that make it a nightmare to look at on mobile and at work.


We were either required or recommended to keep track of salaries on google spreadsheets. It's your own issue for having a problem with the rules...
ace625214
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,463
And1: 604
Joined: May 31, 2014

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#17 » by ace625214 » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:26 pm

spree8 wrote:
This isn't necessary dude. Getting pissed at me because you are the only one in this game who can't view an image (at your job) of my roster is silly. I don't even know how that's possible, and why you didn't take the 45 seconds to look at it when you got home to a better device. Leaving me off of every category because of this...unbelievable. :roll:


I'm not pissed, it was just an annoyance. I just got some free time now to fill out my rankings and wanted to put you in, but I literally cannot see your roster. I know you have Butler and Oladipo. Other than that I don't have a clue. I liked your roster, but I don't have it memorized. I won't be home before Dame closes the rankings. He asked for more people to get them in, so I was going to oblige and add mine.

The second part was a subjective ranking. That had nothing to do with leaving you off my list. You put work into your roster page and I can appreciate that, but it took a long time to scroll down to get to the other teams. I like being efficient and getting the info quickly. Again, Dame said it was a subjective ranking.

As for how it's possible: businesses often block image hosting sites.


We were either required or recommended to keep track of salaries on google spreadsheets. It's your own issue for having a problem with the rules...


Keeping track of them on google docs is good to keep it organized during the course of the game, but copy/pasting your final number in the writeup isn't too tough. I'm looking at the writeup thread and making rankings, not searching through all of the roster pages too. Also, where were we recommended or required? I can't find that in any of dame's rules/roster posts.
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 13,748
And1: 5,696
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#18 » by spree8 » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:53 pm

ace625214 wrote:
spree8 wrote:
This isn't necessary dude. Getting pissed at me because you are the only one in this game who can't view an image (at your job) of my roster is silly. I don't even know how that's possible, and why you didn't take the 45 seconds to look at it when you got home to a better device. Leaving me off of every category because of this...unbelievable. :roll:


I'm not pissed, it was just an annoyance. I just got some free time now to fill out my rankings and wanted to put you in, but I literally cannot see your roster. I know you have Butler and Oladipo. Other than that I don't have a clue. I liked your roster, but I don't have it memorized. I won't be home before Dame closes the rankings. He asked for more people to get them in, so I was going to oblige and add mine.

The second part was a subjective ranking. That had nothing to do with leaving you off my list. You put work into your roster page and I can appreciate that, but it took a long time to scroll down to get to the other teams. I like being efficient and getting the info quickly. Again, Dame said it was a subjective ranking.

As for how it's possible: businesses often block image hosting sites.


We were either required or recommended to keep track of salaries on google spreadsheets. It's your own issue for having a problem with the rules...


Keeping track of them on google docs is good to keep it organized during the course of the game, but copy/pasting your final number in the writeup isn't too tough. I'm looking at the writeup thread and making rankings, not searching through all of the roster pages too. Also, where were we recommended or required? I can't find that in any of dame's rules/roster posts.


Considering they should've been sent in yesterday (until a very last minute deadline push), I'd prob say it's poor time management on your part than anything I'm responsible for bra. Regarding the roster page length...everybody's is that long and longer. Stop being such a grouch! lol. Seems like you're annoyed by a lot (Google docs, images, page length, "stupid pictures", "not getting love in rankings")...so why play?


Oh and btw, my team has a lot more than Dipo n Butler...

Eric Bledsoe/ Reggie Jackson
Victor Oladipo/ Ben McLemore/ Marshon Brooks
Jimmy Butler/ Doug McDermott
Markieff Morris/ Thomas Robinson/ Marcus Morris
Andre Drummond/ Jordan Hill
GMAT Knicks :king:

Luka Dončić
Jamal Murray
Donte DiVincenzo
RJ Barrett
Joel Embiid
ace625214
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,463
And1: 604
Joined: May 31, 2014

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#19 » by ace625214 » Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:18 pm

Haha I'm not grouchy at all. It was a subjective roster page ranking and I ranked it subjectively. Like I said, I wasn't even going to send my rankings in, but dame emailed and asked for more, so I was going to do it for him.

I know your team has a lot more than Butler and Oladipo. That's why I mentioned you in my post. I liked your roster and said I wanted to add you, but I could not see exactly what it was and didn't remember enough of it to put you in.

As far as being annoyed by a lot, you can list out all the things you want if it makes you happy. I said I was disappointed at not getting ranked, not annoyed. I thought I did well with the team I was given, but everyone else didn't. That's how the game goes. I'm not going to go in a corner and pout about it. I said I liked google docs, but the write-ups are supposed to contain all the team info needed to rank the team. Pasting an 8-digit number like most people did is good enough for me. How am I supposed to rank a team off a write-up if it doesn't have all the info? Pictures/images, again, subjective ranking.
damecurry
General Manager
Posts: 9,300
And1: 1,517
Joined: May 19, 2014
 

Re: "Post Draft" Gmat Final Rankings 

Post#20 » by damecurry » Tue Jul 29, 2014 8:13 pm

Man I wish people put some this time and passion into playing the game...

Another last minute push back, since everyone loves that, I'm making it 8pm est. Hoping a few more guys will get there's up since we're still only under a dozen.

Return to Trades and Transactions Games