yardbarker

What happened to the RAPM website?

Moderators: tsherkin, Doctor MJ, CellarDoor

Post#1 What happened to the RAPM website?
Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:34 pm by nikomCH

http://stats-for-the-nba.appspot.com/

It now just lists a bunch of teams and the RAPM for this season and the on-off.
nikomCH
Rookie
Posts: 1,164
And1: 159
Joined: Dec 24, 2008
Top

Post#2 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:01 am by blabla

What kind of information is missing that you are interested in?
blabla
Freshman
Posts: 55
And1: 24
Joined: May 23, 2012
Top

Post#3 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:57 pm by nikomCH

It used to list the RAPM data for seasons from 2001-present. There is no way to get that information now.
nikomCH
Rookie
Posts: 1,164
And1: 159
Joined: Dec 24, 2008
Top

Post#4 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:04 pm by Doctor MJ

blabla wrote:What kind of information is missing that you are interested in?


Everything, actually. All the data that was there that made the site useful historically is currently missing. I'm glad I copied as much as I did from the site while the other stuff was up, but I didn't get everything.
In 2007
The rule is the rule. It's not a matter of fairness. It's a matter of correctness.

In 2014
People just misunderstand...You’ve got to use some common sense, too.

I,for one, welcome our new insect overlords.
Doctor MJ



Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 31,388
And1: 1,768
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Treys are for Kicks!
Top

Post#5 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:20 pm by SideshowBob

From what I can gather, J.E. has been tinkering with some new stats that may yield superior predicative power than RAPM.

http://www.apbr.org/metrics/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8025&sid=2d8bfa203ce8d7cba2b3a54844de0fe4&start=30#p13810

I assume it'll all be back up soon
Marty Hart wrote:Every time I think you hit a ceiling, you just keep raising the bar. You are like the Michael Jordan of being a son of a bitch.
SideshowBob

Lead Assistant
User avatar
Posts: 5,364
And1: 1,548
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
Location: DC Metropolitan
Top

Post#6 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:14 am by Rerisen

These numbers look changed drastically from last year? I.e. If anyone remembers the big Rose/Deng thread on the PC board, now we are seeing a complete reversal there, and many other players having gone up or down.

Edit - Reading the link above, obvious big effect from the box score influence. Perhaps not to be called 'the RAPM website' anymore.
Rerisen
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
User avatar
Posts: 75,508
And1: 6,848
Joined: Nov 23, 2003
Top

Post#7 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:49 pm by Doctor MJ

Right, we're having this debate on a thread on the PC board, and I'm currently explaining my vehement disapproval on the APBRmetrics board. Just started having this discussion yesterday so I don't want to jump the gun, but I'm quite alarmed.

It's interesting because when I first got into all this stuff, I had major fights over on APBR where guys there just didn't see value in +/- stats. I had thought we'd gotten past these issues, but right now it seems to me like the guys who actually know enough to make the stats don't really understand why other people like using them so much. Kind of flabbergasted.
In 2007
The rule is the rule. It's not a matter of fairness. It's a matter of correctness.

In 2014
People just misunderstand...You’ve got to use some common sense, too.

I,for one, welcome our new insect overlords.
Doctor MJ



Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 31,388
And1: 1,768
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Treys are for Kicks!
Top

Post#8 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:44 am by AussieBuck

Doctor MJ wrote:Right, we're having this debate on a thread on the PC board, and I'm currently explaining my vehement disapproval on the APBRmetrics board. Just started having this discussion yesterday so I don't want to jump the gun, but I'm quite alarmed.

It's interesting because when I first got into all this stuff, I had major fights over on APBR where guys there just didn't see value in +/- stats. I had thought we'd gotten past these issues, but right now it seems to me like the guys who actually know enough to make the stats don't really understand why other people like using them so much. Kind of flabbergasted.

Any news about this? I need a fix of non-boxscore stuff. :D
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
AussieBuck

RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 21,019
And1: 1,202
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: saveourbucks.com
Top

Post#9 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Fri Jan 4, 2013 12:09 am by AussieBuck

So I guess RAPM is dead then?
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
AussieBuck

RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 21,019
And1: 1,202
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: saveourbucks.com
Top

Post#10 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Fri Jan 4, 2013 12:45 am by nikomCH

No it's been brought back but it's not the same stat as before, it's been renamed as xRAPM and has become more of a statistical plus minus.

http://stats-for-the-nba.appspot.com
nikomCH
Rookie
Posts: 1,164
And1: 159
Joined: Dec 24, 2008
Top

Post#11 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Fri Jan 4, 2013 6:22 pm by AussieBuck

nikomCH wrote:No it's been brought back but it's not the same stat as before, it's been renamed as xRAPM and has become more of a statistical plus minus.

http://stats-for-the-nba.appspot.com

Yeah so it's dead.
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
AussieBuck

RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 21,019
And1: 1,202
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: saveourbucks.com
Top

Post#12 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Mar 4, 2013 8:41 am by rockmanslim

nikomCH wrote:No it's been brought back but it's not the same stat as before, it's been renamed as xRAPM and has become more of a statistical plus minus.

http://stats-for-the-nba.appspot.com


How is that different from what it was previously? Is it possible to explain in layman's terms?
click

"Harden's a guy that averages 26 in the NBA, but if he was on the playground with you he'd only average about 5 because they wouldn't let him get those free throws." --Scott Hastings, April 6, 2013


Image
rockmanslim

Lead Assistant
User avatar
Posts: 4,825
And1: 837
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
Location: off looking for a "high oiled machine"
Top

Post#13 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Mar 4, 2013 2:59 pm by Doormatt

From what I understand he uses the box score to prior inform his RAPM (meaning something to base it off of) whereas before I believe it was non prior informed or RAPM informed. Either way the old version had absolutely nothing to do with the box score.
#doorgek
Doormatt


RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 15,515
And1: 1,300
Joined: Mar 7, 2011
Top

Post#14 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Mar 4, 2013 5:53 pm by SideshowBob

Doormatt wrote:From what I understand he uses the box score to prior inform his RAPM (meaning something to base it off of) whereas before I believe it was non prior informed or RAPM informed. Either way the old version had absolutely nothing to do with the box score.


That's half of what he's done.

He's taken the stat that you've described and blended it with the old "prior-informed" RAPM. That's what's listed on his site. It's essentially an average of a box-informed RAPM and the old RAPM
Marty Hart wrote:Every time I think you hit a ceiling, you just keep raising the bar. You are like the Michael Jordan of being a son of a bitch.
SideshowBob

Lead Assistant
User avatar
Posts: 5,364
And1: 1,548
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
Location: DC Metropolitan
Top

Post#15 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Mar 4, 2013 6:43 pm by Doormatt

He says it's more accurate but the whole point of RAPM is to give us something outside of the box score so it doesn't make sense to me.
#doorgek
Doormatt


RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 15,515
And1: 1,300
Joined: Mar 7, 2011
Top

Post#16 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Mar 4, 2013 7:07 pm by SideshowBob

Doormatt wrote:He says it's more accurate but the whole point of RAPM is to give us something outside of the box score so it doesn't make sense to me.


I wouldn't say accurate, it's better in terms of making point margin predictions over the course of the season (which is generally how superiority is determined between these stats). But yeah, I have the same issues, I prefer the old RAPM.

For basketball analysis, it makes more sense to look at a non box-score figure in conjunction to box-score performance, and it sucks that we don't have any non-box-score +/- model publicly available right now. But I suppose that most of the stat guys don't really care about that, they just want to have the most accurate predictions.
Marty Hart wrote:Every time I think you hit a ceiling, you just keep raising the bar. You are like the Michael Jordan of being a son of a bitch.
SideshowBob

Lead Assistant
User avatar
Posts: 5,364
And1: 1,548
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
Location: DC Metropolitan
Top

Post#17 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Mar 4, 2013 7:12 pm by Doormatt

Well maybe accurate isn't the right word but more reliable.

Also I think davidstern went back and did the calculations for the old RAPM, it's on google doc out there. I have it but I'm on my phone in class right now o_o
#doorgek
Doormatt


RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 15,515
And1: 1,300
Joined: Mar 7, 2011
Top

Post#18 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Mon Mar 4, 2013 8:28 pm by SideshowBob

Doormatt wrote:Well maybe accurate isn't the right word but more reliable.

Also I think davidstern went back and did the calculations for the old RAPM, it's on google doc out there. I have it but I'm on my phone in class right now o_o


Yeah, rapcity posted it on the PC board a couple weeks ago I think, so I managed to save it :)
Marty Hart wrote:Every time I think you hit a ceiling, you just keep raising the bar. You are like the Michael Jordan of being a son of a bitch.
SideshowBob

Lead Assistant
User avatar
Posts: 5,364
And1: 1,548
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
Location: DC Metropolitan
Top

Post#19 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Wed Mar 6, 2013 7:33 pm by Doctor MJ

AussieBuck wrote:So I guess RAPM is dead then?


If by dead you mean "only available and being used by NBA teams", then yes, it's dead.

Slate actually had an article nailing the current phenomenon: NBA teams are hiring APBRmetrics folks - specifically +/- folks - faster than the internet seems to spawn them. Add in one crazy Engelmann literally not understanding the purpose of these stats as he produces them, and the public is totally cutoff for the moment.

Meanwhile of course, nba.com and b-r are light years ahead of where they were just a few years ago. I feel like the next reliably RAPM website we get might actually be one of those.
In 2007
The rule is the rule. It's not a matter of fairness. It's a matter of correctness.

In 2014
People just misunderstand...You’ve got to use some common sense, too.

I,for one, welcome our new insect overlords.
Doctor MJ



Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 31,388
And1: 1,768
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Treys are for Kicks!
Top

Post#20 Re: What happened to the RAPM website?
Wed Mar 6, 2013 7:40 pm by Doctor MJ

Doormatt wrote:Well maybe accurate isn't the right word but more reliable.

Also I think davidstern went back and did the calculations for the old RAPM, it's on google doc out there. I have it but I'm on my phone in class right now o_o


To get technical:

accurate & validity are synonyms: They ask about whether there's a bias in the data that moves the results away from the bullseye.

precision & reliability are synonyms: They ask about how consistent the data is.

The move from APM to RAPM was a move toward reliability and away from validity, which is why I never supported it as a one totally replacing the other, however the reliability jump was big, the validity fall seemed pretty small, and its usage was still completely orthogonal to the other tools available to us.

Engelmann's attempted move to XRAPM was again a move toward reliability and away from validity, but this time ruining the orthogonality relative to box score stats. I suppose what initially made me most annoyed is that Engelmann doesn't even seem to see his studies in terms of validity and reliability. He doesn't seem to even think about tradeoffs when designing a stat...and if your means of judging your stat is just well it collectively seems to make predictions that makes sense. No good analyst however is constrained to blindly use only 1 stat for all players.
In 2007
The rule is the rule. It's not a matter of fairness. It's a matter of correctness.

In 2014
People just misunderstand...You’ve got to use some common sense, too.

I,for one, welcome our new insect overlords.
Doctor MJ



Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 31,388
And1: 1,768
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Treys are for Kicks!
Top

Next

Return to Statistical Analysis


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users