Code: Select all
Team PS W PS L PS SRS RS/PS W RS/PS L RS/PS SRS
1977 POR 14 5 7.96 63 38 5.87
1978 WAS 14 7 6.12 58 45 1.90
1979 SEA 12 5 6.08 64 35 3.27
1980 LAL 12 4 7.54 72 26 5.74
1981 BOS 12 5 9.56 72 25 6.65
1982 LAL 12 2 9.91 69 27 5.18
1983 PHI 12 1 10.47 77 18 7.93
1984 BOS 15 8 6.41 77 28 6.42
1985 LAL 15 4 12.63 77 24 7.64
1986 BOS 15 3 12.83 82 18 9.74
1987 LAL 15 3 12.49 80 20 9.07
1988 LAL 15 9 4.5 77 29 4.74Code: Select all
1989 DET 15 2 11.12 78 21 7.08
1990 DET 15 5 9.35 74 28 6.18
1991 CHI 15 2 14.04 76 23 9.51
1992 CHI 15 7 9.89 82 22 10.03
1993 CHI 15 4 10.74 72 29 7.05
1994 HOU 15 8 7.48 73 32 4.91
1995 HOU 15 7 8.49 62 42 3.61
1996 CHI 15 3 14.64 87 13 12.31
1997 CHI 15 4 10.76 84 17 10.71
1998 CHI 15 6 10.72 77 26 7.95
1999 SAS 15 2 10.35 52 15 7.94
2000 LAL 15 8 6.78 82 23 8.05
2001 LAL 15 1 18.17 71 27 6.1Code: Select all
2002 LAL 15 4 9.21 73 28 7.54
2003 SAS 16 8 9.65 76 30 6.56
2004 DET 16 7 8.84 69 35 5.87
2005 SAS 16 7 7.92 75 30 7.86
2006 MIA 16 7 7.25 68 37 4.39
2007 SAS 16 4 7.68 74 28 8.22
2008 BOS 16 10 7.49 82 26 8.87
2009 LAL 16 7 10.69 81 24 7.89
2010 LAL 16 7 7.8 73 32 5.44
2011 DAL 16 5 10.13 73 30 5.58
2012 MIA 16 7 9.98 62 27 6.82
2013 MIA 16 7 8.48 82 23 7.352. Best PS runs by SRS
Code: Select all
Team PS W PS L PS SRS
2001 LAL 15 1 18.17
1996 CHI 15 3 14.64
1991 CHI 15 2 14.04
1986 BOS 15 3 12.83
1985 LAL 15 4 12.63
1987 LAL 15 3 12.49
1989 DET 15 2 11.12
1997 CHI 15 4 10.76
1993 CHI 15 4 10.74
1998 CHI 15 6 10.72
2009 LAL 16 7 10.69Code: Select all
1983 PHI 12 1 10.47
1999 SAS 15 2 10.35
2011 DAL 16 5 10.13
2012 MIA 16 7 9.98
1982 LAL 12 2 9.91
1992 CHI 15 7 9.89
2003 SAS 16 8 9.65
1981 BOS 12 5 9.56
1990 DET 15 5 9.35
2002 LAL 15 4 9.21
2004 DET 16 7 8.84
1995 HOU 15 7 8.49
2013 MIA 16 7 8.48Code: Select all
1977 POR 14 5 7.96
2005 SAS 16 7 7.92
2010 LAL 16 7 7.8
2007 SAS 16 4 7.68
1980 LAL 12 4 7.54
2008 BOS 16 10 7.49
1994 HOU 15 8 7.48
2006 MIA 16 7 7.25
2000 LAL 15 8 6.78
1984 BOS 15 8 6.41
1978 WAS 14 7 6.12
1979 SEA 12 5 6.08
1988 LAL 15 9 4.53. Best Overall Runs
Code: Select all
Team RS/PS W RS/PS L RS/PS SRS
1996 CHI 87 13 12.31
1997 CHI 84 17 10.71
1992 CHI 82 22 10.03
1986 BOS 82 18 9.74
1991 CHI 76 23 9.51
1987 LAL 80 20 9.07
2008 BOS 82 26 8.87
2007 SAS 74 28 8.22
2000 LAL 82 23 8.05
1998 CHI 77 26 7.95
1999 SAS 52 15 7.94
1983 PHI 77 18 7.93Code: Select all
2009 LAL 81 24 7.89
2005 SAS 75 30 7.86
1985 LAL 77 24 7.64
2002 LAL 73 28 7.54
2013 MIA 82 23 7.35
1989 DET 78 21 7.08
1993 CHI 72 29 7.05
2012 MIA 62 27 6.82
1981 BOS 72 25 6.65
2003 SAS 76 30 6.56
1984 BOS 77 28 6.42
1990 DET 74 28 6.18
2001 LAL 71 27 6.1Code: Select all
1977 POR 63 38 5.87
2004 DET 69 35 5.87
1980 LAL 72 26 5.74
2011 DAL 73 30 5.58
2010 LAL 73 32 5.44
1982 LAL 69 27 5.18
1994 HOU 73 32 4.91
1988 LAL 77 29 4.74
2006 MIA 68 37 4.39
1995 HOU 62 42 3.61
1979 SEA 64 35 3.27
1978 WAS 58 45 1.87Random Thoughts:
1. The 2001 Lakers are massive outliers in PS performance and difference between PS performance and RS performance. This is probably a rare case in which coasting did really occur along with a bit of fluky performance in the post-season.
2. The 90s Bulls are by far the best dynasty when it comes to number of elite seasons.
3. I still believe the 95 Rockets are slightly worse than the 94 Rockets and that the 95 Rockets are by far the worse NBA champion since 1980.
4. Showtime may have faced weak PS competition in the mid-80s but they did crush them.
5. Mavericks 2010 PS run is very underrated.
I calculated SRS as home court being worth 3 points so this is a back of the envelope