ImageImageImageImageImage

Official John Wall Appreciation Thread

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
Higga
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,877
And1: 831
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Location: Tyson's Corner, VA

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1401 » by Higga » Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:52 pm

GhostsOfGil wrote:
His per 36 numbers are ridiculous; about 23 ppg and 9 assists. I'm not sure we could have asked for a better start from a player who missed 33 games.


Well guys usually take that jump into superstardom in their third season, so it's not out of the realm of possibility that Wall has taken that step(or is on the verge of taking it)but we're just now seeing it obviously due to the injury.

Hope he can keep it up...
Eric Maynor is the worst basketball player I've ever seen.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,579
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1402 » by Ruzious » Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:57 pm

Illuminaire wrote:Wall actually hits a decent number of his "jumpshots" when it's a set shot. His problem seems to be with the actual jumping part; we've all seen how he tends to fire when he's coming down, which I suspect is the cause of his decreased accuracy. It's a timing thing, one he doesn't have to worry about with free throws.

Yup, that's the same problem that MKG has - it's actually worse with MKG. Their HS coaches should have nipped that in the bud. Imagine those 2 with good jump shots.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
JonathanJoseph
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,319
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 03, 2009

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1403 » by JonathanJoseph » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:35 am

I still don't know what some of you are watching. I keep coming back to the same description for Wall: Fool's Gold.

I'm depressed because I don't think Wall will ever be a winning NBA player. He's a super athlete but just not a PG. You just can't have a PG who can't shoot and has no basketball IQ. As Flip Saunders used to say, PGs are born not made and John Wall was not born with those traits.

I see that everyone is all excited about the statistics and I do think Wall could be an elite defensive player, but that's not what makes for a championship PG.

To be specific, he's a guy who can't shoot but still looks for his shot and takes numerous low % jumpers early in the shot clock, too many possessions where no other players touch the ball on offense, too many out of control drives where he ends up falling on the floor, still no feel for tempo or running a basketball team. You never see any of those things from a CP3, Rondo or even Kyrie Irving or Dame Lillard. Those things aren't learned from experience because those are things PGs are born with.

SVG was correct. :(
Twitter: @jonathanjoseph
CntOutSmrtCrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,203
And1: 3,151
Joined: Dec 08, 2011

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1404 » by CntOutSmrtCrazy » Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:00 am

What the hell are you talking about JonathanJoseph, what indicates that Wall has a low Bball IQ? It it because his jumper isn't where you want it?
User avatar
B-easy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,999
And1: 488
Joined: Apr 08, 2010

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1405 » by B-easy » Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:01 am

haha he is just trolling us.
User avatar
B-easy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,999
And1: 488
Joined: Apr 08, 2010

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1406 » by B-easy » Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:07 am

For what its worth, Wall's PER is at 24.45, per 36 he is averaging 21/11.

Though I highly doubt he can keep up those number when he starts getting more minutes.
User avatar
DaRealHibachi
Veteran
Posts: 2,864
And1: 173
Joined: Apr 11, 2008
Location: Rebuild..?? What Rebuild..??

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1407 » by DaRealHibachi » Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:31 am

JonathanJoseph wrote:I still don't know what some of you are watching. I keep coming back to the same description for Wall: Fool's Gold.

I'm depressed because I don't think Wall will ever be a winning NBA player. He's a super athlete but just not a PG. You just can't have a PG who can't shoot and has no basketball IQ. As Flip Saunders used to say, PGs are born not made and John Wall was not born with those traits.

I see that everyone is all excited about the statistics and I do think Wall could be an elite defensive player, but that's not what makes for a championship PG.

To be specific, he's a guy who can't shoot but still looks for his shot and takes numerous low % jumpers early in the shot clock, too many possessions where no other players touch the ball on offense, too many out of control drives where he ends up falling on the floor, still no feel for tempo or running a basketball team. You never see any of those things from a CP3, Rondo or even Kyrie Irving or Dame Lillard. Those things aren't learned from experience because those are things PGs are born with.

SVG was correct. :(


You almost had me fooled... :lol:

He just forgot the green font guys... :wink:
:beer: Magnumt
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1408 » by fishercob » Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:43 pm

JonathanJoseph wrote:I still don't know what some of you are watching. I keep coming back to the same description for Wall: Fool's Gold.

I'm depressed because I don't think Wall will ever be a winning NBA player. He's a super athlete but just not a PG. You just can't have a PG who can't shoot and has no basketball IQ. As Flip Saunders used to say, PGs are born not made and John Wall was not born with those traits.

I see that everyone is all excited about the statistics and I do think Wall could be an elite defensive player, but that's not what makes for a championship PG.

To be specific, he's a guy who can't shoot but still looks for his shot and takes numerous low % jumpers early in the shot clock, too many possessions where no other players touch the ball on offense, too many out of control drives where he ends up falling on the floor, still no feel for tempo or running a basketball team. You never see any of those things from a CP3, Rondo or even Kyrie Irving or Dame Lillard. Those things aren't learned from experience because those are things PGs are born with.

SVG was correct. :(


When you strip away some of the histrionics, I am afraid I agree with much of the concern espoused in this post. I thought Wall was more bad than good against the Kings, particularly in the second half.

He seems to have a chip on his shoulder -- he's trying to prove to the world he can shoot from the outside and is trying to will himself to do so. But that's a "me" attitude and not a team-focused one. He has to recognize that there were much better offensive options than many of the shots he hoisted in the 2h, and as a pg he needs to facilitate more of those shots.

Until he fixes the mechanics on that broken jumper, he needs to play much more of a Rondo game and needs to play much more user control. Even when the wild forays to the basket don't yield turnovers, he gets himself way out of position and leaves the D very vulnerable to runouts.

Tough matchup a the rest of this trip. Could get ugly.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
Upper Decker
Rookie
Posts: 1,223
And1: 166
Joined: Apr 05, 2012

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1409 » by Upper Decker » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:04 pm

I'm really sad about walls jumper. It looks worse than last year. Some of the junk he threw up against sacramento was just terrible. Worst collection of jump shots I've seen from a player in a single game in my life. It made me realize he's likely never going to fix the jumper. Apparently thats all he worked on all summer and fall. If thats the case how can it be so bad?
User avatar
Induveca
Head Coach
Posts: 7,379
And1: 724
Joined: Dec 02, 2004
   

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1410 » by Induveca » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:57 pm

I can't be mad at the guy....the team has gone from being lethargic to decisive/fast/confident since his return.

His presence on the court in practice/games has made a noticeable difference for all players.
User avatar
GhostsOfGil
General Manager
Posts: 8,506
And1: 899
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1411 » by GhostsOfGil » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:02 pm

fishercob wrote:
JonathanJoseph wrote:I still don't know what some of you are watching. I keep coming back to the same description for Wall: Fool's Gold.

I'm depressed because I don't think Wall will ever be a winning NBA player. He's a super athlete but just not a PG. You just can't have a PG who can't shoot and has no basketball IQ. As Flip Saunders used to say, PGs are born not made and John Wall was not born with those traits.

I see that everyone is all excited about the statistics and I do think Wall could be an elite defensive player, but that's not what makes for a championship PG.

To be specific, he's a guy who can't shoot but still looks for his shot and takes numerous low % jumpers early in the shot clock, too many possessions where no other players touch the ball on offense, too many out of control drives where he ends up falling on the floor, still no feel for tempo or running a basketball team. You never see any of those things from a CP3, Rondo or even Kyrie Irving or Dame Lillard. Those things aren't learned from experience because those are things PGs are born with.

SVG was correct. :(


When you strip away some of the histrionics, I am afraid I agree with much of the concern espoused in this post. I thought Wall was more bad than good against the Kings, particularly in the second half.

He seems to have a chip on his shoulder -- he's trying to prove to the world he can shoot from the outside and is trying to will himself to do so. But that's a "me" attitude and not a team-focused one. He has to recognize that there were much better offensive options than many of the shots he hoisted in the 2h, and as a pg he needs to facilitate more of those shots.

Until he fixes the mechanics on that broken jumper, he needs to play much more of a Rondo game and needs to play much more user control. Even when the wild forays to the basket don't yield turnovers, he gets himself way out of position and leaves the D very vulnerable to runouts.

Tough matchup a the rest of this trip. Could get ugly.

I agree. He made some great drive and dish passes, but when he decides to isolate and create offense for himself, its painful to watch.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 66,967
And1: 19,281
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1412 » by nate33 » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:47 pm

Wall is a mixed bag. On the one hand, I'm very impressed to see how quickly he has regained his old form with respect to driving the basket, and he looks like he is an even better passer than last year. He made 2 or 3 incredible assists last night - the type of assists that average PG's simply don't see. His defense looks good too, though he wasn't quite prepared to guard a surprisingly quick Jimmer Fredette.

On the other hand, his jumper is still completely broken. He simply can't move into the top tier of PG's unless he fixes it. I was really hoping that his mechanics would improve since he had so long to work on it, but the mechanics are still awful.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1413 » by fishercob » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:21 pm

nate33 wrote:Wall is a mixed bag. On the one hand, I'm very impressed to see how quickly he has regained his old form with respect to driving the basket, and he looks like he is an even better passer than last year. He made 2 or 3 incredible assists last night - the type of assists that average PG's simply don't see. His defense looks good too, though he wasn't quite prepared to guard a surprisingly quick Jimmer Fredette.

On the other hand, his jumper is still completely broken. He simply can't move into the top tier of PG's unless he fixes it. I was really hoping that his mechanics would improve since he had so long to work on it, but the mechanics are still awful.


WHile his skillset is indeed a mixed bag, my cause for concern is Wall's application of those skills. Wall having a shaky jumper is one thing, but him forcing said shaky jumper when there are much better options available, is a larger issue.

I'm very wary of ISO'ing wall at the top of the floor, even if it;s against someone who he has an athletic advantage against. He forces the issue and often takes either out-of-control runs to the basket or bad jumpers. I much prefer to see him in pick and roll situations where he has a clear set of options -- hit the roll man, finish at the rim, or find a shooter in the corner. I also like Wall coming off of screens b/c he's much harder to defend when he has a running start.

Wall and the coaches need to be honest with themselves about what Wall can and can't do and they need to run the team accordingly.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 12,607
And1: 5,883
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1414 » by TGW » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:29 pm

JonathanJoseph wrote:I still don't know what some of you are watching. I keep coming back to the same description for Wall: Fool's Gold.

I'm depressed because I don't think Wall will ever be a winning NBA player. He's a super athlete but just not a PG. You just can't have a PG who can't shoot and has no basketball IQ. As Flip Saunders used to say, PGs are born not made and John Wall was not born with those traits.

I see that everyone is all excited about the statistics and I do think Wall could be an elite defensive player, but that's not what makes for a championship PG.

To be specific, he's a guy who can't shoot but still looks for his shot and takes numerous low % jumpers early in the shot clock, too many possessions where no other players touch the ball on offense, too many out of control drives where he ends up falling on the floor, still no feel for tempo or running a basketball team. You never see any of those things from a CP3, Rondo or even Kyrie Irving or Dame Lillard. Those things aren't learned from experience because those are things PGs are born with.

SVG was correct. :(


Just curious--why is the team playing MUCH better basketball with him in the lineup as opposed to him being out? If he's a ballhogging, out-of-control, clown with no ability to run a team, why is he a +14 when he's on the floor?

I'm not buying this emotional rant. I agree that the jumpshot is off, but I'm not seeing the rest of what you're claiming.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1415 » by Nivek » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:33 pm

You guys are making good points. Wall has adequate assets to be a good PG. Not top-shelf until he learns how to shoot, but good. But fish is exactly right, it will require thoughtful application of those assets.

Taking long 2pt attempts is a bad idea unless you can hit half of them. If you're going to shoot 20-30% on long jumpers, take those jumpers from 3pt range. Better still, don't take that shot at all, except as a last resort. Penetrate, dish, set up teammates, run the offense.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
AFM
General Manager
Posts: 9,866
And1: 6,148
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1416 » by AFM » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:36 pm

Beal @ the corner 3 + Wall slashing = money all damn day...
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1417 » by fishercob » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:38 pm

TGW wrote:
JonathanJoseph wrote:I still don't know what some of you are watching. I keep coming back to the same description for Wall: Fool's Gold.

I'm depressed because I don't think Wall will ever be a winning NBA player. He's a super athlete but just not a PG. You just can't have a PG who can't shoot and has no basketball IQ. As Flip Saunders used to say, PGs are born not made and John Wall was not born with those traits.

I see that everyone is all excited about the statistics and I do think Wall could be an elite defensive player, but that's not what makes for a championship PG.

To be specific, he's a guy who can't shoot but still looks for his shot and takes numerous low % jumpers early in the shot clock, too many possessions where no other players touch the ball on offense, too many out of control drives where he ends up falling on the floor, still no feel for tempo or running a basketball team. You never see any of those things from a CP3, Rondo or even Kyrie Irving or Dame Lillard. Those things aren't learned from experience because those are things PGs are born with.

SVG was correct. :(


Just curious--why is the team playing MUCH better basketball with him in the lineup as opposed to him being out? If he's a ballhogging, out-of-control, clown with no ability to run a team, why is he a +14 when he's on the floor?

I'm not buying this emotional rant. I agree that the jumpshot is off, but I'm not seeing the rest of what you're claiming.


I don't think this is a fair or accurate characterization. Firstly, they beat OKC without him. Secondly, AJ Price had his best two games of the season in Wall's first two games back, which leads me to believe that the matchup just weren't all that tough. I don't think the data supports that they're much better with him on the floor, but even if it did that wouldn't necessarily reflect causality.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1418 » by Nivek » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:46 pm

TGW wrote:
JonathanJoseph wrote:I still don't know what some of you are watching. I keep coming back to the same description for Wall: Fool's Gold.

I'm depressed because I don't think Wall will ever be a winning NBA player. He's a super athlete but just not a PG. You just can't have a PG who can't shoot and has no basketball IQ. As Flip Saunders used to say, PGs are born not made and John Wall was not born with those traits.

I see that everyone is all excited about the statistics and I do think Wall could be an elite defensive player, but that's not what makes for a championship PG.

To be specific, he's a guy who can't shoot but still looks for his shot and takes numerous low % jumpers early in the shot clock, too many possessions where no other players touch the ball on offense, too many out of control drives where he ends up falling on the floor, still no feel for tempo or running a basketball team. You never see any of those things from a CP3, Rondo or even Kyrie Irving or Dame Lillard. Those things aren't learned from experience because those are things PGs are born with.

SVG was correct. :(


Just curious--why is the team playing MUCH better basketball with him in the lineup as opposed to him being out? If he's a ballhogging, out-of-control, clown with no ability to run a team, why is he a +14 when he's on the floor?

I'm not buying this emotional rant. I agree that the jumpshot is off, but I'm not seeing the rest of what you're claiming.


Addressed this in the blog yesterday. In the first two games of Wall's return, the Wizards offense was significantly worse when he was on the floor. Offensive rating of 98 when he was on the floor; 113 overall in those games. The defense was better when he played, but not by as much as it would look when glancing at the numbers on 82games. When he was on the floor in those two games, they had a drtg (pts allowed per possession x 100) of 91. Their drtg for those two games: 93.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,569
And1: 7,703
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1419 » by montestewart » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:56 pm

fishercob wrote:
nate33 wrote:Wall is a mixed bag. On the one hand, I'm very impressed to see how quickly he has regained his old form with respect to driving the basket, and he looks like he is an even better passer than last year. He made 2 or 3 incredible assists last night - the type of assists that average PG's simply don't see. His defense looks good too, though he wasn't quite prepared to guard a surprisingly quick Jimmer Fredette.

On the other hand, his jumper is still completely broken. He simply can't move into the top tier of PG's unless he fixes it. I was really hoping that his mechanics would improve since he had so long to work on it, but the mechanics are still awful.


WHile his skillset is indeed a mixed bag, my cause for concern is Wall's application of those skills. Wall having a shaky jumper is one thing, but him forcing said shaky jumper when there are much better options available, is a larger issue.

I'm very wary of ISO'ing wall at the top of the floor, even if it;s against someone who he has an athletic advantage against. He forces the issue and often takes either out-of-control runs to the basket or bad jumpers. I much prefer to see him in pick and roll situations where he has a clear set of options -- hit the roll man, finish at the rim, or find a shooter in the corner. I also like Wall coming off of screens b/c he's much harder to defend when he has a running start.

Wall and the coaches need to be honest with themselves about what Wall can and can't do and they need to run the team accordingly.

Good points. In addition to taking bad jump shots or getting called for the charge, he's still playing a style that maybe loses the ball too much. On the plus side, in this small sample, he is getting to the line more and making more assists. I'll take those turnovers if he's feeding more teammate scoring, but he really has to stop taking those momentum killing shots, and the team needs openly coach as if him taking such shots is a big liability.
User avatar
AFM
General Manager
Posts: 9,866
And1: 6,148
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Official John Wall Appreciation Thread 

Post#1420 » by AFM » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:24 pm

His assists in the SAC game were sick. I thought I was watching Rondo send a perfect bounce pass to a cutting Garnett rather than Wall to Nene. That pass to Nene for the and 1 was awesome. Great passes to the corner 3's for Beal (and Ariza but he missed all of his open looks). He really is a pure PG in a scoring PG's body.

Return to Washington Wizards