JonathanJoseph wrote:I made that point a while back in another thread. I said there was a correlation between Wall having a lower usage rate and team success. I totally believe that to be the case.
Wall led the team in FGA vs NJ. A guaranteed recipe for failure.
1 other game POR, he shot 10-14 with 8-9 FTA and scored 29 in a win.
The other 4 games were he shot and scored more were
OKC 6-17 13-14 FT 25pts
TOR 10-18 11-14 FT 31pts
CLE 8-17 8-10 FT 24pts
NO 11-16 4-4FT 26 pts
So that is 7 games where he shot 12 or so shots, and didnt score a lot .. they won.
1 game was a low shooting but high scoring game for a total of 8 wins on low shooting.
4 games of high shooting/high scoring were wins
So that is 8 wins with low shooting vs 4 wins with high shooting.
In all of 8 Nene games, Nene never shot more then 13 times. They were 2-6. Also, in all of those games, no team scored more then 95 with 2 games under 80 and 5 games less then 90.
In those 8 Nene games Wall had some poor shooting games 1-10, 5-17, 6-17. All loses.
The 8 Nene games also coincided with Crawford scoring 20 pts a game on 63-135. 67.5 would have been 50% shooting so he was in 47% range.
In the two wins that Nene and Wall did played together, Wall was
NJ 5-13 2-2FT 8ast 12pts Crawford was 7-13 8-10FT 23 pts
PHI 4-12 1-1FT 6ast 9pts Crawford was 7-17 2-2FT 17 pts
What conclusion can you draw? Small sample size for sure but it looks like Nene is a huge difference maker. They played better D. Crawford was way more effective. And Wall has 3 really poor games 2 of which he shot 17 times.