yardbarker

NCAA Wiretap Headlines

Official Trade Thread XX (6/22/12 - 12/13/12)

Moderators: LyricalRico, pineappleheadindc, WizStorm, nate33, miller31time

Post#1471 Re: Official Trade Thread XX (6/22/12 - pres
Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:35 pm by Dat2U

Illuminaire wrote:I've already shared my thoughts on WS as a measuring tool, PIF. You fall back on it every time... we're just going to have to disagree if that's your go to move, and I don't trust it as an accurate measure.


Agreed. Any statistical measure is going to have it flaws. It certainly can't be used as the lone piece to measure someone's value. IMO, you have to take into account a number of different statistical tools to get an overall picture of a players real impact.

Being solely dependent on one measuring tool and being so vociferous in your arguments to such is how one can wind up looking incredibly wrong and stupid in the long run.

Anyone knows how Landry Fields is doing up in Toronto these days?
Dat2U wrote:
ibraheim718 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:I pretty much guarantee less than 20 wins for the Lakers this year, who wants to do a sig bet?

I'll take that bet. 19 wins or less and you win and 20 wins or more and I win.

Deal, I'll have a nice Wizards sig for you come next May. :D
Dat2U




RealGM
Posts: 16,495
And1: 778
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
Top

Post#1472 Re: Official Trade Thread XX (6/22/12 - pres
Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:57 pm by dangermouse

fishercob mentioned in the Harden thread about trading for Gay.

I just wanted to say, no way. It would (probably) take us giving up our first. Right now we are playing on track to draft Shabazz, who I think could be as good as Gay, and with a much cooler name.
Fri Jul 5, 2013 4:36 am by dangermouse
dangermouse wrote:44 is my best guess.

I think we make the playoffs, no lower than 6th seed.
dangermouse
Assistant Coach
User avatar
Posts: 4,113
And1: 176
Joined: Dec 8, 2009
Top

Post#1473 Re: Official Trade Thread XX (6/22/12 - pres
Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:02 pm by montestewart

Illuminaire wrote:I've already shared my thoughts on WS as a measuring tool, PIF. You fall back on it every time... we're just going to have to disagree if that's your go to move, and I don't trust it as an accurate measure.

I like the WS measure, but I agree with your premise. Like other measures, WS can slight some and over-reward others that happen to be overly strong or weak in a key area of the system. Still, you could legitimately arrive at the same conclusion about Wall using other means, including just looking at his shooting % from the 2 and 3 and his turnovers, especially coupled with the team's record. I still think Wall has the tools to be an all-star (maybe they could try surrounding him with some scorers), but right now I'd be happy to see him return healthy, and just work on being really good.
montestewart
General Manager
Posts: 7,895
And1: 872
Joined: Feb 24, 2009
Top

Post#1474 Re: Official Trade Thread XX (6/22/12 - pres
Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:33 pm by Benjammin

dangermouse wrote:fishercob mentioned in the Harden thread about trading for Gay.

I just wanted to say, no way. It would (probably) take us giving up our first. Right now we are playing on track to draft Shabazz, who I think could be as good as Gay, and with a much cooler name.


I believe he was saying that would be a typical Wizards/Boulez short-term move that looks good on paper. It was by no means a good thing in his mind, I believe.
Benjammin
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,383
And1: 35
Joined: Jan 17, 2003
Location: Richmond VA
Top

Post#1475 Re: Official Trade Thread XX (6/22/12 - pres
Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:02 am by dangermouse

Yeah I kinda got that, just wanted to bring it over to this thread so I could formalise what I would think of said trade.
Fri Jul 5, 2013 4:36 am by dangermouse
dangermouse wrote:44 is my best guess.

I think we make the playoffs, no lower than 6th seed.
dangermouse
Assistant Coach
User avatar
Posts: 4,113
And1: 176
Joined: Dec 8, 2009
Top

Post#1476 Re: Official Trade Thread XX (6/22/12 - pres
Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:42 am by Nivek

To the Rubio vs. Wall thing for a moment. Using MY stat tool, which (despite dat's unsubstantiated claim to the contrary) is without flaw, I'd agree with payitforward's basic assessment. In my measure, 100 = average and higher is better...

Rubio -- Rookie -- 104
Wall -- Rookie -- 87
Wall -- Year 2 -- 97

It's actually interesting to see how remarkably similar their rookie seasons were category by category. Wall actually shot for a higher percentage from the floor. Their rebounding was virtually identical. Rubio had more assists and steals. Turnovers were about the same.

Wall shot more frequently so he had more missed shots. Another factor, at least in my rating, Rubio performed better in the defense part of my metric.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
Nivek





Head Coach
User avatar
Posts: 6,848
And1: 679
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Top

Previous

Return to Washington Wizards


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DaRealHibachi, dlts20, hands11, J-Ves, McFilthy, Sluggerface, TheBabyMaker, theboomking, Wizardspride