ImageImageImageImageImage

Bradley Beal

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,293
And1: 2,439
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#941 » by nuposse04 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:20 pm

I'm beginning to think W. Matthews and Afflalo might be the floor of this kid, which isn't all that terrible. I think he might end up being some sort of hybrid Gordon+Redd by the end of it, while his shooting is looking beautiful these days, asking him to be the next Ray Allen might be a bit much.

We might have the future best defensive back court tandem. In a league beginning to be dominated by perimeter play, that may count for something.
DCsOwn
Junior
Posts: 480
And1: 126
Joined: Jul 07, 2010

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#942 » by DCsOwn » Wed Jan 16, 2013 2:22 am

Ruzious wrote:My opinion of Beal hasn't changed from day 1 - He's going to be a very good solid starting player. I don't see greatness in him. I see a poor man's Harden - especially when they were matched up against each other - a very smart controlled player with good - not great all-around skills and solid - but not top athleticism and size. When you watch a couple games of McLemore, you see what great athleticism is - with a great shooting touch and relatively the same as Beal in other categories. I'm not knocking Beal - I'm a fan of his. That's just what I see in honestly evaluating potential, fwiw.


I don't understand why people have taken to calling Beal a poor man's Harden when he plays nothing like Harden. His game is much more akin to a Richard Hamilton than Harden, but even that isn't the greatest comp since he's shorter than Hamilton, but much stronger and I think he's more explosive going to the basket and vertically.

Anyway, I'm not convinced that McLemore is on a different plane than Beal athletically. I'm not. He's athletic as hell sure, but Beal is massively underrated athletically. McLemore can sky, but is he going to appreciably clear 39.0 inches with his max vert? I doubt it very much. He has a solid first step, but is his no step vert, the best measure of sudden explosion imo, gonna be much better than 33.0 inches? Doubt it. Is his lane agility going to be much better than 10.95, is he going to bench more than the 8 reps Beal had at the combine etc. Doubt it.

And with Beal, those athletic numbers clearly translate onto the court (and those are high-end numbers). Despite not being viewed in the same light as McLemore athletically, in college Beal was a tremendous rebounder (although he did play the three admittedly), and he had several nasty dunks over defenders that were more impressive than anything I've seen from McLemore on that front. At the NBA level, we've all seen how easily Beal moves laterally and how strong of an on-ball defender he is. We've seen him catch oops, we've seen him dunk on people, we've seen him soar for rebounds etc. He's downgraded by most on that front for two reasons. The first is that his handle isn't tight enough for him to fully utilize his blow by ability off the dribble, so his first step looks unremarkable on most dribble drives (although he's shown a very solid first step when working out of the triple threat position), and secondly he plays a very smooth and under control game. It's the same reason that Ray Allen perpetually had his athleticism underrated until he took off on someone every few games.

From my viewings, the only clear advantage McLemore seemed to have over Beal is that he looks a bit faster running in the open court (I also thought that he looked a little taller and longer, but DraftExpress has him listed at 6 4.5 181 with a 6'7 wingspan. Those are 2010 measurements so it's probably best to say that we don't know how they measure relative to one another on those fronts.) We'll see what he does at the combine though for the definitive word I guess.
User avatar
OffTheWall2
Junior
Posts: 417
And1: 116
Joined: Mar 27, 2012
Location: DMV
 

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#943 » by OffTheWall2 » Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:25 pm

Mitch Richmond was and is the best comparison for Beal imo.

I'll take a Richmond'esque career out of my 3rd pick any day of the week.
Image
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,569
And1: 7,703
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#944 » by montestewart » Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:06 pm

OffTheWall2 wrote:Mitch Richmond was and is the best comparison for Beal imo.

I'll take a Richmond'esque career out of my 3rd pick any day of the week.

And in 10-12 years, we can trade him for a Webberesque player in his prime.
SizzlinSimms
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 55
Joined: Jan 08, 2013
 

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#945 » by SizzlinSimms » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:42 am

Has looked great tonight and the past few games.

I was very skeptical early in the season, but now that he has confidence, his shot is falling, also playing with Wall will help.

I foresee a great future. Will he be a top ten player in the league? Doubtful and I don't think anybody expects that but I see him being a great compliment to Wall. The confidence and what Whitman is asking this 19 year to do is pretty astonishing. Not many 19 year olds could do that.
User avatar
gambitx777
General Manager
Posts: 9,618
And1: 1,730
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#946 » by gambitx777 » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:46 am

having a hell of a night tonight, 6 3's and 10 minutes to go in the 4th Q
DCZards
General Manager
Posts: 9,994
And1: 3,969
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#947 » by DCZards » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:53 am

SizzlinSimms wrote:The confidence and what Whitman is asking this 19 year to do is pretty astonishing. Not many 19 year olds could do that.


Yup, not many 19 year old rookies are being asked to be the go-to scorer for an NBA team. Yet that's exactly what Beal has become.
TheBigThree
Starter
Posts: 2,133
And1: 124
Joined: Mar 20, 2008

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#948 » by TheBigThree » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:27 am

Tough loss, but I'll sleep easy knowing Beal is now shooting 61% from 3 in January.
Halcyon
Veteran
Posts: 2,826
And1: 479
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
       

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#949 » by Halcyon » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:32 am

Beal is turning into a sick shooter. Now guys are gonna run him off the three point line even more now, and force him to dribble. The good thing is that he makes pretty good decisions overall, so it'll be interesting to see how he counters teams doing this.
SizzlinSimms
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 55
Joined: Jan 08, 2013
 

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#950 » by SizzlinSimms » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:14 am

DCZards wrote:
SizzlinSimms wrote:The confidence and what Whitman is asking this 19 year to do is pretty astonishing. Not many 19 year olds could do that.


Yup, not many 19 year old rookies are being asked to be the go-to scorer for an NBA team. Yet that's exactly what Beal has become.

I'll go ahead and quote a paragraph I posted to another a far smaller forum:
Second of all from this game, I love Bradley Beal. I truly BEALieve. I mean this young guy is only 19 years old. Randy Whitman, definitely not the greatest coach, but not the worst despite our record, more on him later, has a lot of trust in this young rookie and believes that he's capable of performing in the league as of right now. He had a great game tonight: 9 of 14 (6/7 from downtown) 6 assists and leading the Wiz with 26 points. He's also the only Wizard to crack 30 mins tonight O_o. Beal played 41 minutes! The last play was diagrammed for Beal. There was a little contact, not really enough to be called, but the fact that the Wizards are relying on a 19 year old old right now still astonishes me. I mean, how many teams best play throughout the season was probably a 19 year old or relied heavily on a 19 year old? I can't think of many. A lot had decent help and players who could shoulder the load or help teach. Beal pretty much has zero. I'd hate Beal to learn from Crawford, Price, Webster, and possibly even Wall. I hope Sam Cassell (he's an assistant coach) might be able to teach him something though. All in all I foresee Beal as a possible 20-25 ppg type player. Some Wiz forums said a similar Mitch Richmond, which thinking about it, would be perfectly fine with me. I'd love to see Beal take the more scoring responsibility and Wall the more playmaker/facilitator role.
thinker07
Junior
Posts: 360
And1: 75
Joined: Jul 08, 2010

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#951 » by thinker07 » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:25 am

I'm pretty skeptical - I'm not sure that he compares to the most successful 3 point shooter in the HISTORY of the NBA. I'm feeling only so so about Beal - It's not clear whether he will be one of the 10 best players in the NBA.
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#952 » by dangermouse » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:29 am

10 best players? Nah. I think he has the tools to be a top 10-15 SG though. Not hard being that it is a rather weak position currently.

One thing is for sure, he is earning his Rookie of the Month honors this time.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
SizzlinSimms
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 55
Joined: Jan 08, 2013
 

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#953 » by SizzlinSimms » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:40 am

That was a pretty high judgment. Do I think he'll even be close to a top 10 player no. Even top 20? Highly probable not. Do I think he'll come a great number 2 option and scorer? Yes. Do I think he can average 20-25 ppg throughout multiple seasons? Yes.

His FG% is god awful right now but I feel that is because of earlier in the season. Did you see the offense they ran earlier in the season. Was that even an offense? Or was it just YMCA pick up basketball? It was all iso, pass iso, pass iso, shot clock winding down and chuck! Why do you think a majority of the Wizards this season have horrible FG%? They took horrible shots. At least with Wall back we see an offense. Beal coming off picks, down low posts, Wall driving and kicking out. It's not the greatest, but damn at least it's not what we saw earlier in the season.

I'm not a basketball tactician or strategist, but I can tell the Wizards are playing with far more confidence and scheme than earlier in the season. I don't know how much has to do with Whitman finding a workable plan or Wall coming back. However I do know that Beal has been playing extremely well these past couple weeks.
SizzlinSimms
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 55
Joined: Jan 08, 2013
 

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#954 » by SizzlinSimms » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:41 am

By top ten I meant top ten player in the league during any season. Not a top ten player career wise. Ha.
Jimmy Recard
RealGM
Posts: 10,191
And1: 5,373
Joined: Feb 08, 2009
 

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#955 » by Jimmy Recard » Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:03 am

Updated numbers through january (8 games):

18.8 ppg
FG% 46.3
TS% 57.2
3.7 rpg
3.4 apg
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#956 » by dangermouse » Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:48 am

SizzlinSimms wrote:By top ten I meant top ten player in the league during any season. Not a top ten player career wise. Ha.


Yeah thats what I assumed. I still disagree. Make it top 20 and we can shake on it.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#957 » by dangermouse » Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:53 am

Jimmy Recard wrote:Updated numbers through january (8 games):

18.8 ppg
FG% 46.3
TS% 57.2
3.7 rpg
3.4 apg


Wow, those are some ridiculously good stats for a 19 year old rook. Against some good teams too.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 18,493
And1: 3,925
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#958 » by tontoz » Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:27 pm

18% from 3 last month, 61% from 3 this month. :lol:
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 52,633
And1: 8,992
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#959 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:32 pm

DCZards wrote:
SizzlinSimms wrote:The confidence and what Whitman is asking this 19 year to do is pretty astonishing. Not many 19 year olds could do that.


Yup, not many 19 year old rookies are being asked to be the go-to scorer for an NBA team. Yet that's exactly what Beal has become.


On second thought, I take back what I said about I would trade Beal for McLemore, Smart, or possibly McCollum. :oops:

Beal could end up better than Wall. Or, they could end up being one of the better NBA backcourts.
Bye bye Beal.
User avatar
Induveca
Head Coach
Posts: 7,379
And1: 724
Joined: Dec 02, 2004
   

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#960 » by Induveca » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:40 pm

montestewart wrote:
OffTheWall2 wrote:Mitch Richmond was and is the best comparison for Beal imo.

I'll take a Richmond'esque career out of my 3rd pick any day of the week.

And in 10-12 years, we can trade him for a Webberesque player in his prime.


:)

Return to Washington Wizards