DCZards wrote:Nivek wrote:
Actually, what I wouldn't mind seeing is them starting Humphries and bringing Nenê off the bench as the third big. That would essentially render the Seraphin or Blair decision moot.
Totally agree on starting Hump over Nene. While there's a lot to like about the chemistry that's developed between Gortat and Nene, there's even more to like about the rebounding, toughness and athleticism (at least compared to Nene) that Hump would bring to the starting lineup. It would also reduce Nene's minutes and the wear-and-tear on his aging body.
And bringing Nene off the bench would give the Zards a scoring big man off the bench and, as you say, lessen the need to play Seraphin.
I rarely feel the urge to defend Wittman, but I think it's justified in this case.
1. I think Humphries is more suited to be an energy guy off the bench. NBA games are long and you've got to get some production in the late first, early second and early fourth quarters. Hump has an advantage over plenty of second team PFs whereas he wouldn't look as good against first teamers.
2. We're dealing with personalities here. My guess is that it means more to Nene than to Hump to start. Players have to buy in to the pecking order.
3. All that said, if we really want to see Hump in the starting lineup, just wait a bit. Nene is overdue for his annual 15 game hang nail injury.
