yardbarker

Looking at the numbers . . .

Moderators: WizStorm, LyricalRico, miller31time, nate33

ImageImageImageImageImage

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby nate33 on Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:19 pm

Nivek wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Nivek wrote:Comprehensive rookie ratings over at the blog.

Drummond is atop the list. Beal ranks 16th -- right at average for this class of rookies (minimum 200 total minutes). Needs to continue his recent improvement.

I'm a big believer in per-minute numbers, but only up to a point. Guys that are playing 15 minutes per game or fewer really get their numbers skewed because they are so often playing against backups and/or playing only in garbage time. I would pretty much disregard any of these rookies playing 16 minutes or less.


Already accounted for in PPA. The numbers include an adjustment based on that Starter% term.

Wow. Nice!
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 35308
And1: 67
Joined: Oct 27, 2002

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby Nivek on Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:26 pm

I normally use 500 minutes as the cutoff for reliability in per minute stats. (Research from some of the stat guys suggest per minute stats stabilize around 150 total minutes, but I've always preferred 500.) I used 200 for the rookies because the season isn't even to the halfway point yet.

But, out of curiosity, I went to the 500-minute cutoff point. So far, 23 rookies have played at least 500 minutes. Beal ranks 11th in PPA among that group. Rookies with 500+ minutes have an average PPA of 80 so far -- a little better than Beal's 75.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Visit my blog about the Redskins, Wizards, Nationals and Capitols.
User avatar
Nivek
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4692
And1: 53
Joined: Sep 29, 2010

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby AFM on Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:31 pm

I know it's a small sample size but what's Beal's PPA in the last month?
RIP Big Balls. Goodnight sweet prince...
User avatar
AFM
Rookie
 
Posts: 1128
And1: 23
Joined: May 25, 2012

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby Nivek on Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:59 pm

AFM wrote:I know it's a small sample size but what's Beal's PPA in the last month?


Here are Beal's PPA scores by month:

Oct/Nov -- 52
December -- 65
January -- 124

The January number IS encouraging, but when I drill down, I do see things that make me...well..."nervous" isn't quite the right word, but it'll do. Specifically, Beal's improvement is almost exclusively in the category of 3pt shooting. His 2pt% is .397 in January -- down from .447 in December, which was up from .333 in Oct/Nov.

In January, his per minute numbers are down if fta, reb, and ast. He's a little better in steals, turnovers and fouls. All his numbers are at least decent for a SG, so no real worries. More of an observation, really.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Visit my blog about the Redskins, Wizards, Nationals and Capitols.
User avatar
Nivek
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4692
And1: 53
Joined: Sep 29, 2010

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby tontoz on Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:14 pm

A few weeks ago Beal tried to dunk on Josh Smith and got punked so badly he ended up missing a couple of games. Against OKC he tried to dunk on Ibaka. He definitely has a lot to learn as far as finishing in/near the paint.

It also seems like too often he will go up for a jumper when a defender is in a good position to block/contest it.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
 
Posts: 11247
And1: 15
Joined: Apr 10, 2005

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby montestewart on Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:28 pm

tontoz wrote:A few weeks ago Beal tried to dunk on Josh Smith and got punked so badly he ended up missing a couple of games. Against OKC he tried to dunk on Ibaka. He definitely has a lot to learn as far as finishing in/near the paint.

It also seems like too often he will go up for a jumper when a defender is in a good position to block/contest it.

It's those types of shortcomings that I don't worry much about right now. He seems smart and capable of working, adapting, and learning, and those seem the type of things a 19-year-old rookie would still be learning about the NBA.
montestewart
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5286
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 24, 2009

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby tontoz on Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:58 pm

montestewart wrote:
tontoz wrote:A few weeks ago Beal tried to dunk on Josh Smith and got punked so badly he ended up missing a couple of games. Against OKC he tried to dunk on Ibaka. He definitely has a lot to learn as far as finishing in/near the paint.

It also seems like too often he will go up for a jumper when a defender is in a good position to block/contest it.

It's those types of shortcomings that I don't worry much about right now. He seems smart and capable of working, adapting, and learning, and those seem the type of things a 19-year-old rookie would still be learning about the NBA.



Agreed. Harden's 2 point percentage was pretty bad as a rookie. He only shot 47% at the rim compared to Beals current 59%.

Now that Beal seems to be past his rookie jitters i am hoping that he just makes his open jumpers at a good rate. These other things will probably take more time.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
 
Posts: 11247
And1: 15
Joined: Apr 10, 2005

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby GhostsOfGil on Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:00 pm

tontoz wrote:
montestewart wrote:
tontoz wrote:A few weeks ago Beal tried to dunk on Josh Smith and got punked so badly he ended up missing a couple of games. Against OKC he tried to dunk on Ibaka. He definitely has a lot to learn as far as finishing in/near the paint.

It also seems like too often he will go up for a jumper when a defender is in a good position to block/contest it.

It's those types of shortcomings that I don't worry much about right now. He seems smart and capable of working, adapting, and learning, and those seem the type of things a 19-year-old rookie would still be learning about the NBA.



Agreed. Harden's 2 point percentage was pretty bad as a rookie. He only shot 47% at the rim compared to Beals current 59%.

Now that Beal seems to be past his rookie jitters i am hoping that he just makes his open jumpers at a good rate. These other things will probably take more time.


The big reason for this was because Harden was blocked at the rim nearly 20% of the time... I had concernes about Beals shot blocked % until I saw that number.
User avatar
GhostsOfGil
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6298
And1: 48
Joined: Jul 5, 2006

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby hands11 on Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:35 am

http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/playe ... fied/false

If they had only drafted NIkola like I wanted.

Not bad for a 22 year old in his second year. That would have been some nice center depth.
From 2008 to 2011 How many games did Nene not play. Answer 12
I hope he can return to that.
User avatar
hands11
RealGM
 
Posts: 15511
And1: 16
Joined: May 15, 2005

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby Nivek on Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:18 pm

"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Visit my blog about the Redskins, Wizards, Nationals and Capitols.
User avatar
Nivek
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4692
And1: 53
Joined: Sep 29, 2010

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby Jay81 on Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:21 pm

Nivek wrote:Latest stats update, including a look at Beal's January and Wall's start to the season.


what the heck is AJ price doing on that over 100 list? Did Ernie actually make a good move?
Jay81
Rookie
 
Posts: 1239
And1: 4
Joined: Nov 10, 2010

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby Nivek on Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:23 pm

Price has played well recently. We'll see where he ends up, but at present put Price in the "Ernie found one" column.

Need to go back and re-run the numbers on Price with some of the tweaks I've made to PPA this season.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Visit my blog about the Redskins, Wizards, Nationals and Capitols.
User avatar
Nivek
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4692
And1: 53
Joined: Sep 29, 2010

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby hands11 on Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:09 pm

Nivek wrote:Price has played well recently. We'll see where he ends up, but at present put Price in the "Ernie found one" column.

Need to go back and re-run the numbers on Price with some of the tweaks I've made to PPA this season.


Along with Webster.

Webster is at TS% .581
From 2008 to 2011 How many games did Nene not play. Answer 12
I hope he can return to that.
User avatar
hands11
RealGM
 
Posts: 15511
And1: 16
Joined: May 15, 2005

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby Nivek on Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:43 pm

Latest stat update looking at the full season, and at the last 10 games. For those past 10 games, Okafor playing like a top 10 player in the league, Webster like a top 15 player, Price like a top 50. Beal, Wall and Nene are the other players producing at an average or better rate, according to PPA over the past 10.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Visit my blog about the Redskins, Wizards, Nationals and Capitols.
User avatar
Nivek
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4692
And1: 53
Joined: Sep 29, 2010

Re: Looking at the numbers . . .

Postby Zonkerbl on Mon Jan 28, 2013 3:18 pm

I see you've changed "replacement level" from 70 to 45...
Jazz comm: (about the free Chick Fil-a) "They should be giving away free paper bags"
Zonkerbl
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 2523
And1: 14
Joined: Mar 24, 2010

PreviousNext

Return to Washington Wizards

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: closg00, gambitx777, nuposse04, Terpman