Kendall Marshall going on waivers?

Jay81 · Post #1 » by **Jay81** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:00 am

is he someone we can pick up off waivers?

dlts20 · Post #2 » by **dlts20** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:14 am

I dont like him over Wall or Miller at all and I honestly would rather have Temple play over him at this point. Temple's defense is a million times better

Chocolate City Jordanaire · Post #3 » by **Chocolate City Jordanaire** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:48 pm

There are too many PFs on the roster. Marshall would be a good floor leader behind Miller in case Wall was injured.

I don't see Temple as a playmaking guard.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using RealGM Forums mobile app

mhd · Post #4 » by **mhd** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 1:12 pm

We would have won at least 4-5 more games with Marshall the whole year instead of Fart.

Chocolate City Jordanaire · Post #5 » by **Chocolate City Jordanaire** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 11:22 pm

Marshall will be on an NBA roster, somewhere...

The Lakers plan to place guard Kendall Marshall on waivers, but have a strong interest in re-signing him to a new deal should he go unclaimed in the waiver process, league sources told Yahoo Sports.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources--l ... 33320.html

Kanyewest · Post #6 » by **Kanyewest** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 12:41 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/490628502572781568[/tweet]

hands11 · Post #7 » by **hands11** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 12:48 am

dlts20 wrote:I dont like him over Wall or Miller at all and I honestly would rather have Temple play over him at this point. Temple's defense is a million times better

It would be more like

Wall/Miller/Marshall
Beal/Webster/Temple
Paul/Otto/Glen
Nene/Hump/Gooden
Gortat/Blair/Kevin S

When healthy.

Temple, Glen and Otto are the perimeter defensive specialists.

3 passing PGs

Much better team ball handling then last year when Wall was pretty much it except Beal getting better.

S4/S5 in PP and Gooden

Much better mid range game with Otto and Humphries in the mix and now a SFs that can score off the dribble.

And load of beef in the post.

But most of that is true with or without KM

FAH1223 · Post #8 » by **FAH1223** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:16 am

The Bucks claimed him.

Which is a good haul for them. They need playmakers there.

closg00 · Post #9 » by **closg00** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:30 am

The Lakers are just trying to save a little $, they will re-up Marshall.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

gambitx777 · Post #10 » by **gambitx777** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:47 am

closg00 wrote:The Lakers are just trying to save a little $, they will re-up Marshall.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Nope, they should have known he would not clear waivers.

Chocolate City Jordanaire · Post #11 » by **Chocolate City Jordanaire** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:10 pm

The sneaky part of that signing by Milwaukee is that Henson played with Marshall at Carolina.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using RealGM Forums mobile app

closg00 · Post #12 » by **closg00** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:05 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
closg00 wrote:The Lakers are just trying to save a little $, they will re-up Marshall.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Nope, they should have known he would not clear waivers.

LA gambled and got burned. Once again we tossed away an asset for nothing AND Marshall could have stepped into old-man Millers spot.

verbal8 · Post #13 » by **verbal8** » Mon Jul 21, 2014 12:25 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
closg00 wrote:The Lakers are just trying to save a little $, they will re-up Marshall.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Nope, they should have known he would not clear waivers.

They waived him so they could complete their amnesty bid on Carlos Boozer. For a team with such a short-term focus as the Lakers, it probably was a decent move. Definitely a great move for the Bucks to acquire him, they need a lot of help in the back-court.

CntOutSmrtCrazy · Post #14 » by **CntOutSmrtCrazy** » Mon Jul 21, 2014 1:37 pm

closg00 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
closg00 wrote:The Lakers are just trying to save a little $, they will re-up Marshall.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Nope, they should have known he would not clear waivers.

LA gambled and got burned. Once again we tossed away an asset for nothing AND Marshall could have stepped into old-man Millers spot.

Dude he put up 8 and 9 on a crappy team and doesn't play defense. Not to mention he was playing in a system (D'Antoni's) that helps PGs with assist numbers. Can some of us get over this guy already. If he was that damn good a highly doubt the Lakers would have risked putting him on waivers.

gambitx777 · Post #15 » by **gambitx777** » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:25 pm

verbal8 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
closg00 wrote:The Lakers are just trying to save a little $, they will re-up Marshall.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Nope, they should have known he would not clear waivers.

They waived him so they could complete their amnesty bid on Carlos Boozer. For a team with such a short-term focus as the Lakers, it probably was a decent move. Definitely a great move for the Bucks to acquire him, they need a lot of help in the back-court.

Because Boozer is going to help them win a title? No! About as much as Marshal will. They are not getting a title run, they are better off keeping the young guy around.