yardbarker

Aggregation question

Moderator: realgm

Re: Aggregation question

Postby DBoys on Sat Jul 28, 2012 2:16 am

Dunkenstein wrote:Since Phoenix had so much cap room, was it even necessary to aggregate Milller's contract with Dyson's? Couldn't they be treated as two separate trades?


If I'm not mistaken, it wasn't a Phoenix issue. It was NO who had Miller, and they were the ones needing to aggregate outgoing TPE from Miller (with Dyson's) to accept the salaries of Warwick and Lopez. Had they not been able to do so, it would have reduced the amount they could offer Lopez by around $1M in 1st year salary, clearly enough to kill the deal.
DBoys
Rookie
 
Posts: 1131
And1: 10
Joined: Aug 22, 2010

Re: Aggregation question

Postby Dunkenstein on Sat Jul 28, 2012 2:32 am

DBoys wrote:
Dunkenstein wrote:Since Phoenix had so much cap room, was it even necessary to aggregate Milller's contract with Dyson's? Couldn't they be treated as two separate trades?


If I'm not mistaken, it wasn't a Phoenix issue. It was NO who had Miller, and they were the ones needing to aggregate outgoing TPE from Miller (with Dyson's) to accept the salaries of Warwick and Lopez. Had they not been able to do so, it would have reduced the amount they could offer Lopez by around $1M in 1st year salary, clearly enough to kill the deal.

I see. Thanks.
User avatar
Dunkenstein
Starter
 
Posts: 2362
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Previous

Return to CBA / Business Related

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users