yardbarker

Aggregation question

Moderator: RealGM

Post#16 Re: Aggregation question
Sat Jul 28, 2012 2:16 am by DBoys

Dunkenstein wrote:Since Phoenix had so much cap room, was it even necessary to aggregate Milller's contract with Dyson's? Couldn't they be treated as two separate trades?


If I'm not mistaken, it wasn't a Phoenix issue. It was NO who had Miller, and they were the ones needing to aggregate outgoing TPE from Miller (with Dyson's) to accept the salaries of Warwick and Lopez. Had they not been able to do so, it would have reduced the amount they could offer Lopez by around $1M in 1st year salary, clearly enough to kill the deal.
DBoys
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,411
And1: 34
Joined: Aug 22, 2010
Top

Post#17 Re: Aggregation question
Sat Jul 28, 2012 2:32 am by Dunkenstein

DBoys wrote:
Dunkenstein wrote:Since Phoenix had so much cap room, was it even necessary to aggregate Milller's contract with Dyson's? Couldn't they be treated as two separate trades?


If I'm not mistaken, it wasn't a Phoenix issue. It was NO who had Miller, and they were the ones needing to aggregate outgoing TPE from Miller (with Dyson's) to accept the salaries of Warwick and Lopez. Had they not been able to do so, it would have reduced the amount they could offer Lopez by around $1M in 1st year salary, clearly enough to kill the deal.

I see. Thanks.
Dunkenstein
Starter
Posts: 2,423
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Top


Return to CBA & Business


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users