Aggregation question

Moderator: Smitty731

DBoys
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,478
And1: 43
Joined: Aug 22, 2010

Re: Aggregation question 

Post#16 » by DBoys » Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:16 am

Dunkenstein wrote:Since Phoenix had so much cap room, was it even necessary to aggregate Milller's contract with Dyson's? Couldn't they be treated as two separate trades?


If I'm not mistaken, it wasn't a Phoenix issue. It was NO who had Miller, and they were the ones needing to aggregate outgoing TPE from Miller (with Dyson's) to accept the salaries of Warwick and Lopez. Had they not been able to do so, it would have reduced the amount they could offer Lopez by around $1M in 1st year salary, clearly enough to kill the deal.
Dunkenstein
Starter
Posts: 2,444
And1: 12
Joined: Jun 17, 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Re: Aggregation question 

Post#17 » by Dunkenstein » Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:32 am

DBoys wrote:
Dunkenstein wrote:Since Phoenix had so much cap room, was it even necessary to aggregate Milller's contract with Dyson's? Couldn't they be treated as two separate trades?


If I'm not mistaken, it wasn't a Phoenix issue. It was NO who had Miller, and they were the ones needing to aggregate outgoing TPE from Miller (with Dyson's) to accept the salaries of Warwick and Lopez. Had they not been able to do so, it would have reduced the amount they could offer Lopez by around $1M in 1st year salary, clearly enough to kill the deal.

I see. Thanks.

Return to CBA & Business