Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread

Want something added or changed? Let yourself be heard here!
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 41,679
And1: 2,831
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#1 » by Howard Mass » Wed May 9, 2012 10:02 am

RealGM Users,

Our new Signature and Avatar Policy has been implemented.

Users may upload Signatures and Avatars from Imageshack.US, Imgur.com, Photobucket.com and Tinypic.com

Signatures may now also be up to 550 by 90.

Any signatures and avatars that were uploaded before the implementation that are from unapproved site or are above the current Signature Size limit remain.

We ask that you change these if you have them. If myself or a Moderator sees any on the forums, they will be deleted.

If anyone has question or wishes to regain their Signature rights, please send me a PM.

Sites That Users Can Upload Signatures and Avatars From

We are going to restrict where users can upload Signatures and Avatars from to only trusted sites like Photobucket.com, Imageshack.US, Imgur.com and Tinypic.com. We will be taking suggestions in this thread and adding other trusted sites as we go along and possibly before June 4.

This change is due to various incidents where users have uploaded a Signature or Avatar from an unreliable site that then sets off the virus protection of users. These Signatures and Avatars from those sites then block off that page to some users unless they turn off Signatures and Avatars. The worst thing is users think they have a virus when they do not. By making this change, we will prevent all of this.

If you use other sites besides PhotoBucket.com and imageshack.us, please list them in this thread and we will consider adding them to the list of approved sites.

Signature Size Limit Change

Our Signature Size Limit is going to be changing and it comes with an application that will not allow any users to exceed it.

Our current Signature Size Limit is 400 by 90 Pixels.

However, we have decided to increase this to 550 by 90 Pixels. :D This will mean Signature can now be as wide as a post.

Here is an example of the new largest allowed Signature of 550 by 90 Pixels.

Image

On a final note, when these new changes are implemented on June 4, any user who has lost their Signature Rights due to an oversized Signature or past infraction may contact me via Private Message and request them back. Each request will be a case by case basis.

If anyone has any questions or concerns about these changes, please post them on this thread.
User avatar
blkout
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 31,640
And1: 1,867
Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Location: Melbourne
 

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#2 » by blkout » Wed May 9, 2012 10:46 am

imgur.com and tinypic.com are two pretty big/popular image hosting places.
Image
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 41,679
And1: 2,831
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#3 » by Howard Mass » Wed May 9, 2012 10:48 am

blkout,

They are in contention to be added.
User avatar
Stannis
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 7,406
And1: 587
Joined: Dec 05, 2011
Location: United States
     

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#4 » by Stannis » Wed May 9, 2012 10:51 am

To my knowledge, 562 pixels is the width of a post. I used a 562 pixel wide signature and it fit perfectly within the post, and it was exactly the width of the post on all my devices (laptop, desktop, and smartphone).

Correct me if I am wrong about the 562, but this is what I always thought the width of a post was.

550 pixels still has some space left to fill for the width of the post, in my opinion.

Can the signature be as wide as a post (562 pixels) or only 550 pixels?

Here is a signature that is as wide as a post (562 pixels):
Image
http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/5788/giantsw.png

Compared to the 550 pixel wide signature:
ImageImage

Can we use signatures as wide as a post? (562 pixels). Or is 550 pixels wide going to remain the limit?

All in all, having signatures increased to 550 pixels is great, and I am happy to have those extra pixels; :) however, I would be a little bit happier using the full 562. :D
Image
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 41,679
And1: 2,831
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#5 » by Howard Mass » Wed May 9, 2012 10:56 am

Shpati21,

I see that but 550 is just an easier number for everyone.
User avatar
Stannis
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 7,406
And1: 587
Joined: Dec 05, 2011
Location: United States
     

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#6 » by Stannis » Wed May 9, 2012 11:03 am

Howard Mass wrote:Shpati21,

I see that but 550 is just an easier number for everyone.

That mean we can't use 562? :-?
Image
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 41,679
And1: 2,831
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#7 » by Howard Mass » Wed May 9, 2012 11:05 am

Shpati21 wrote:
Howard Mass wrote:Shpati21,

I see that but 550 is just an easier number for everyone.

That mean we can't use 562? :-?


:nonono:
User avatar
Stannis
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 7,406
And1: 587
Joined: Dec 05, 2011
Location: United States
     

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#8 » by Stannis » Wed May 9, 2012 11:20 am

Howard Mass wrote:
Shpati21 wrote:
Howard Mass wrote:Shpati21,

I see that but 550 is just an easier number for everyone.

That mean we can't use 562? :-?


:nonono:

Alright, I got it. I appreciate your responses.

Thank you
Image
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 41,679
And1: 2,831
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#9 » by Howard Mass » Wed May 9, 2012 11:20 am

And I appreciate your feedback.

Thanks!
User avatar
Knicks D
Senior
Posts: 685
And1: 1
Joined: May 11, 2010
Location: Right Here

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#10 » by Knicks D » Wed May 9, 2012 12:43 pm

I use the free web space verizon gives me to host images. Is that going to be allowed?
Image
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 41,679
And1: 2,831
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#11 » by Howard Mass » Wed May 9, 2012 1:03 pm

Knicks D,

What website does it come from exactly or is it space on your PC?

Please let me know.

Thanks!
User avatar
albert
Veteran
Posts: 2,796
And1: 26
Joined: Jul 14, 2006

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#12 » by albert » Wed May 9, 2012 2:02 pm

^It would be verizon.net/~username/file.jpg or something along those lines.

My suggestion: http://imgur.com/
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 41,679
And1: 2,831
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#13 » by Howard Mass » Wed May 9, 2012 2:42 pm

I'll run the Verizon one by our contractor.

imgur was also mentioned above and several Moderators have requested it as well.
Imadogg
Banned User
Posts: 8,182
And1: 250
Joined: Oct 24, 2010
Location: Reseda
Contact:

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#14 » by Imadogg » Wed May 9, 2012 3:27 pm

blkout wrote:imgur.com and tinypic.com are two pretty big/popular image hosting places.

I'll add a yes to both of these, and I use exclusively use imgur these days as it's the most reliable and best IMO. Definitely should be added to the list
User avatar
Howard Mass
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 41,679
And1: 2,831
Joined: Feb 20, 2001
Location: Longwood, Florida
Contact:
       

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#15 » by Howard Mass » Wed May 9, 2012 4:35 pm

That's another "Yes" for imgur.com and tinypic.com

Please keep your thoughts coming.
User avatar
James_Raptors
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,993
And1: 893
Joined: Jan 22, 2009
Location: Born in Toronto,living in Barrie.
       

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#16 » by James_Raptors » Wed May 9, 2012 5:43 pm

I edit the size of my pictures using mspaint on my computer and then upload them to my facebook picture folder, then use the facebook link to show my avatar here.

Is Facebook allowed?
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 27,820
And1: 7,542
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#17 » by Raps in 4 » Wed May 9, 2012 7:14 pm

Will hosting policy changes affect all pictures (like the pictures you embed inside posts) or just signatures and avatars?

And I nominate Imgur as well. Facebook might also be a popular one (I don't use it myself but I imagine others might).
Image
User avatar
James_Raptors
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,993
And1: 893
Joined: Jan 22, 2009
Location: Born in Toronto,living in Barrie.
       

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#18 » by James_Raptors » Wed May 9, 2012 7:36 pm

UssjTrunks wrote: Facebook might also be a popular one (I don't use it myself but I imagine others might).


Like ^
Drake_02
Banned User
Posts: 329
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 25, 2012

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#19 » by Drake_02 » Wed May 9, 2012 8:06 pm

What about Gifs in our sig?
User avatar
darth_federer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,061
And1: 907
Joined: Apr 12, 2009
Contact:

Re: Signature and Avatar Site Hosting Requests/Policy Thread 

Post#20 » by darth_federer » Wed May 9, 2012 8:42 pm

Imgur and Min.us are probably the two best image hosting sites on the internet. Imgur in particular.
Image

Profanity wrote:This is why I question a Canadian team in our league. it's a govt conspiracy trina to sell all our milk to Russia. They let the raptors participate to not let canadians demand crossing taxes. it will backfire one day.

Return to Feedback and Suggestions