The_Hater wrote:BorkLazer wrote:RedX wrote:
Why would melo be in the hall of fame? Seems that anybody and everybody can get in, if that happens.
He hasn't don't anything, hasn't stayed with a team or changed an organization. If anything, he has settled with the Knicks getting a fat pay check and selling his soul and championship desire - if he even had one.
I get that DMC loves melo, cool. But hall of fame? I certainly hope not.
Melo' never even been on an All-NBA first team (or, you know, WON ANYTHING), so yeah, people should be pumping the brakes on the HOF talk
Well it's called the basketball hall of fame not the NBA hall of fame. Even if you still insist on judging him based on that narrow criteria, he still won 3 Gold medals and an NCAA title where he was the MVP.
2 gold medals, 1 bronze, on a TEAM, so does that mean that everyone on that USA team should be in the hall of fame? NCAA Title? ok, should the rest of the people on that team be in the HoF? Should anyone that ever achieves anything in basketball, be in the HoF? I mean if that is your criteria, than by all means give it away like it's candy.
Why does marginal success put someone in the HoF? Are basketball players really that garbage at what they do that any success deems them an entry? I guess a max contract = HoF than? Please, help me understand where you draw the line. I, personally, set much higher criteria for someone to be glorified for eternity vs. celebrated during their playing career — which to me is exactly what Melo deserved in the times he was successful, but as an overall body of work and what he has done for the organizations that he's been on.. Nuggets... Knicks... hell no, he was barely a blip on the radar in what they achieved.
----
I just read one of your other responses. I guess if you are right that any player that scores over 21,000 points is going to the HoF than he'll be there. But that really dilutes the HoF in my books, and downplays the glory of some of the true greats that are in there.