"Coaches all want you to 2.9 [play aggressive weak-side D by packing the paint] now," Ben Gordon says. "And offenses have had to adjust to that."
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/914 ... rantland33
Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben
"Coaches all want you to 2.9 [play aggressive weak-side D by packing the paint] now," Ben Gordon says. "And offenses have had to adjust to that."
LamarMatic7 wrote:Just read this great article by Zach Lowe on defense in today's NBA and I'm absolutely confused on how a Ben Gordon quote made it considering that it's an article about defense. It's like he was Tony Allen or someone and his opinion on this matter was credible."Coaches all want you to 2.9 [play aggressive weak-side D by packing the paint] now," Ben Gordon says. "And offenses have had to adjust to that."
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/914 ... rantland33
BadMofoPimp wrote:LamarMatic7 wrote:Just read this great article by Zach Lowe on defense in today's NBA and I'm absolutely confused on how a Ben Gordon quote made it considering that it's an article about defense. It's like he was Tony Allen or someone and his opinion on this matter was credible."Coaches all want you to 2.9 [play aggressive weak-side D by packing the paint] now," Ben Gordon says. "And offenses have had to adjust to that."
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/914 ... rantland33
FYI. Ben Gordon was commenting from the Offensive perspective.
raleigh wrote:Thoughts on trading Gordon?
The team desperately needs his perimeter shooting, but he clearly makes the team worse overall.
fatlever wrote:gordon was - 85 over this stretch, MKG was +23 over this stretch.
LamarMatic7 wrote:fatlever wrote:gordon was - 85 over this stretch, MKG was +23 over this stretch.
did you propose a bet where MKG's +/- had to be better by a 100? If so, you were spot on.
fatlever wrote:how on earth does ben gordon get a C+?
catch20two wrote:fatlever wrote:how on earth does ben gordon get a C+?
Ben Gordon receives a lot of leniency and benefit of the doubt around the league due to his successful years as a borderline all-star in Chicago's playoff runs when they were nicknamed the Baby Bulls. I thought he deserved a C personally. He did have decent production and percentages for someone playing under 21 minutes per game if you look at the box scores alone but it was just horribly ugly to watch. Too bad that we had to experience it.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.