stinger14 wrote:If Brook Lopez leaves Brooklyn, what about Al and Lance for Joe Johnson
Id try to get them to part with Plumlee too.
Moderators: JDR720, Diop, fatlever, yosemiteben, BigSlam
stinger14 wrote:If Brook Lopez leaves Brooklyn, what about Al and Lance for Joe Johnson
fatlever wrote:Marc Stein @ESPNSteinLine 1m1 minute ago
It's official: With Monday deadline looming, Hornets' Al Jefferson is bypassing free agency for a year. ESPN link: http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/13074 ... n-contract …
no surprise al opting in.
SWedd523 wrote:I hope I'm not the only one not at all willing to trade for Joe Johnson
Braggins wrote:stinger14 wrote:If Brook Lopez leaves Brooklyn, what about Al and Lance for Joe Johnson
Id try to get them to part with Plumlee too.
Flip Murray wrote:SWedd523 wrote:I hope I'm not the only one not at all willing to trade for Joe Johnson
i mean he's just a huge expiring. it wouldn't be some kind of disaster deal
Sik Infant wrote:Flip Murray wrote:SWedd523 wrote:I hope I'm not the only one not at all willing to trade for Joe Johnson
i mean he's just a huge expiring. it wouldn't be some kind of disaster deal
It's a great consolidation trade.
Getting rid of a few players we don't want or need for a former 5 time all star, who's biggest skill is the one thing we lack.
He's a good playmaker which we need next to Kemba and he would provide a post option also.
Combined with the fact that we wouldn't be taking on salary and opening up a couple of roster spots, it's a certified no brainer imo.
I'd do the trade without Plumlee, but we're talking about Billy freaking King here, we should ask for the farm.
Flip Murray wrote:SWedd523 wrote:I hope I'm not the only one not at all willing to trade for Joe Johnson
i mean he's just a huge expiring. it wouldn't be some kind of disaster deal
SWedd523 wrote:Flip Murray wrote:SWedd523 wrote:I hope I'm not the only one not at all willing to trade for Joe Johnson
i mean he's just a huge expiring. it wouldn't be some kind of disaster deal
What exactly is Al, if not a huge expiring?
And Joe is even MORE over the hill than Al. I'm not convinced he can replicate a semi motivated Lance, much less do that AND cover the loss of our only NBA caliber big man.
I also don't understand what difference it makes if he was a former 5 time all star. I care about what guys will do next year. He just averaged the fewest points in over a decade (with a steady yearly decline for some time now), posted a PER slightly worse than Bismack Biyombo's, and averaged less assists per game than Stephenson did (only one more per than Hendo). This isn't allstar Joe. This is a guy clearly on his last legs.
His production can be covered by Hendo and our rookie wing. Add in a slightly motivated Lance and there's no reason to trade for him. It gets even worse when to lose Al, and leave our big man rotation at Marvin/Zeller/Vonleh/Bismack with little to no salary cap to supplement.
That front court isn't winning anytime soon. You'd be better off keeping Al and adding another guard through the draft. Sure, you might be able to add Plumlee in that deal, but he's not moving the needle much either.
SWedd523 wrote:I don't think many teams are very scared of a 34 year old Joe Johnson coming off his worst season since Bush was in office. Especially when you lose the only big on the roster who has to be guarded (and who was more productive than JJ last year).
Flip Murray wrote:SWedd523 wrote:I don't think many teams are very scared of a 34 year old Joe Johnson coming off his worst season since Bush was in office. Especially when you lose the only big on the roster who has to be guarded (and who was more productive than JJ last year).
they're more scared of him than gerald henderson, lance stephenson, and pj hairston i guarantee you that.
SWedd523 wrote:Flip Murray wrote:SWedd523 wrote:I don't think many teams are very scared of a 34 year old Joe Johnson coming off his worst season since Bush was in office. Especially when you lose the only big on the roster who has to be guarded (and who was more productive than JJ last year).
they're more scared of him than gerald henderson, lance stephenson, and pj hairston i guarantee you that.
I don't think I ever disagreed with that.
The offensive drop off from Johnson to Hendo is much smaller than Jefferson to Bismack. Joe ain't making up that difference. I guarantee you that
SWedd523 wrote:Flip Murray wrote:SWedd523 wrote:I don't think many teams are very scared of a 34 year old Joe Johnson coming off his worst season since Bush was in office. Especially when you lose the only big on the roster who has to be guarded (and who was more productive than JJ last year).
they're more scared of him than gerald henderson, lance stephenson, and pj hairston i guarantee you that.
I don't think I ever disagreed with that.
The offensive drop off from Johnson to Hendo is much smaller than Jefferson to Bismack. Joe ain't making up that difference. I guarantee you that