RealGM

Matches Malone wrote:

Nuntius wrote:

Matches Malone wrote:
No it's not just on twitter or reddit. You're a retired mod. Surely you know Mods on some boards don't allow trolling and clean up their posts and delete them... But you didn't see it so I'm just making **** up. Real galaxy brain stuff here.

I know that mods don't allow trolling and delete their posts. So, I did look into it a bit further and I did indeed find that troll you were talking about. It was in the game thread of the last game, not in the post-game threads that I read. These are the posts I found, all posted by the same poster:

"Pacers should've ended this 20 minutes ago wtf Pacers"

"Neismith is a DAWG"

"MYLES FKIN TURNER!!"

It's those 3 and one post that was deleted by a mod and replaced by the word "Troll".

Now, it definitely was a troll precisely because those posts were posted in the game thread of the Bucks RealGM forum. If these posts were posted on the GB, it wouldn't be a troll. But it was posted over in your forum which means that your mods were right to delete the posts. Posting in the opposing teams forum during the game (or after it) and celebrating a win is definitely trollish behavior and no Pacer fan on the Pacers RealGM forum or on the GB condones this sort of behavior. But, you see, the poster who trolled you couldn't possibly know that because he has never posted on the Pacers forum here, on RealGM. Despite being a Pacers fan, he has only posted on the Bucks forum, Raptors forum and the GB.

So, yeah, this is what you're using to judge us all, I guess. A Pacers fan who we have pretty much never interacted with. That's cool

I don't care enough about this to keep going back and forth with you. I said there were trolls to which you dismissed and patronized me about, I gave you proof, and now it's just "That one guy" I'm judging you with, when I already told you there were other threads, other posters and other websites doing the same ****. Your fanbase is rightfully happy, but the self-awareness is non-existent.

Childs wrote:Do the Bucks have any way to get young talent with Giannis? Lopez, Middleton, and Dame aren't getting younger which is of course stating the obvious.

Matches Malone wrote:

Iwasawitness wrote:

Matches Malone wrote:
I don't care enough about this to keep going back and forth with you. I said there were trolls to which you dismissed and patronized me about, I gave you proof, and now it's just "That one guy" I'm judging you with, when I already told you there were other threads, other posters and other websites doing the same ****. Your fanbase is rightfully happy, but the self-awareness is non-existent.

I have no dog in this fight, but I think you're overreacting a bit here.

How so? I made a silly comment about them beating the Wisconsin Herd and it unfolded from there. In what ways did I overreact? I'm not just going to let some poster make up stuff or call me a liar without responding.

Profound23 wrote:

Jadoogar wrote:Obviously this is all dependent on Giannis. If he's healthy, they should destroy the Pacers.
Without Giannis, it's much more of a toss up but i think i still lean Bucks just because Dame has proven it before.

Without Giannis, the Bucks win 1 game because that one game Dame/Beasley/Middleton get hot. If Giannis plays but is still hurt like the Miami series, they win two.

If he is actually healthy, Bucks win the series 4-2....but I have much doubt he will be healthy enough to do Giannis type of things.

jkvonny wrote:Pacers could end the Bucks season tonite.

After looking lost and jittery, young Indiana has bounced back greatly.

Bucks are old and has too many injuries.

skones wrote:

jkvonny wrote:Pacers could end the Bucks season tonite.

After looking lost and jittery in Game 1 (blowout loss), young Indiana has bounced back greatly.

Bucks are old and has too many injuries.

Chuck Everett wrote:Quite the brick by Gallo.

jkvonny wrote:

Chuck Everett wrote:Quite the brick by Gallo.

Gallo is back in action!

Great Nuggets player years back.