Desmond24 wrote:Take any game and it is evident the officials have more accuracte and correct calls/non-calls than bad ones.
Doesn't mean anything. Most drivers get home safely 99,99 % of the time but they're not all great drivers, or safe drivers.
Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris
Desmond24 wrote:Take any game and it is evident the officials have more accuracte and correct calls/non-calls than bad ones.
Alyosha12 wrote:I was thinking how referees could be made to ref better.
What if after every game both coaches and assistant coaches as well as the game delegate would grade the refs from 1-100.
So even if the ref would be in favour of 1 team he would get a 100 from that team but it wouldn't help his average because the other team would give him a 1 and the delegate would have to be objective. It would be best for him to try and do a good job by both teams because his score would be greater.
After all the points would be tallied at the end of the season the best refs would be ranked based on score and the ones with the best score would get a pay bump plus some award for example, and the worse would get a pay cut or if the score would be very low they would be investigated and even fired.
pass first wrote:Desmond24 wrote:Take any game and it is evident the officials have more accuracte and correct calls/non-calls than bad ones.
Doesn't mean anything. Most drivers get home safely 99,99 % of the time but they're not all great drivers, or safe drivers.
KOBE_PAUER wrote:Winning on the road is almost impossible with 2 teams tied in quality.
lakerhater wrote:Alyosha12 wrote:I was thinking how referees could be made to ref better.
What if after every game both coaches and assistant coaches as well as the game delegate would grade the refs from 1-100.
So even if the ref would be in favour of 1 team he would get a 100 from that team but it wouldn't help his average because the other team would give him a 1 and the delegate would have to be objective. It would be best for him to try and do a good job by both teams because his score would be greater.
After all the points would be tallied at the end of the season the best refs would be ranked based on score and the ones with the best score would get a pay bump plus some award for example, and the worse would get a pay cut or if the score would be very low they would be investigated and even fired.
So much wrong in so many of these posts so I'll only reference the OP.
The problem with your idea is that the coaches don't know the rules well enough to be critics. You're asking for more of a disaster than is already happening.
As is each referee must write a paragraph explaining why he blew the whistle on every call. They do this after each game and the league reviews it.
Also, does this mean refs should be able to criticize coaching decisions such as rotations or play calls? Those things lose games as much as perceived bad calls.
mike_miller wrote:^ so then refs no as much about coaching as coaches do?
you ever see a ref talking to a coach after a call is made..or not made...hes explaining the rules to the coach..
smart guy.