Melo prefers Knicks, Bulls.

Ron Harper · Post #181 » by **Ron Harper** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:17 am

MayoisMemphis wrote:Noah hasn't beasted any opponent. Perkins outplayed him in the Boston series and Shaq dominated him physically this year, he was literally 5 feet from the basket every time he even thought of backing down Noah

LOL, Noah averaged 15/13 against Shaq and the Cavs in the playoffs.

"I do not feel the need to verify what I say, I simply do not like this player, so let my opinion be fact"

My favorite type of poster <3

NBA Fan 1234 · Post #182 » by **NBA Fan 1234** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:19 am

Ron Harper wrote:
MayoisMemphis wrote:Noah hasn't beasted any opponent. Perkins outplayed him in the Boston series and Shaq dominated him physically this year, he was literally 5 feet from the basket every time he even thought of backing down Noah

LOL, Noah averaged 15/13 against Shaq and the Cavs in the playoffs.

"I do not feel the need to verify what I say, I simply do not like this player, so let my opinion be fact"

My favorite type of poster <3

Shaq played half of what Noah did...to say that he "beasted Shaq" is way off. When they were matched up, if anything, Shaq played better than, or at least equal to, Noah. Yes, Noah played well against the Cavs, but did not beast Shaq.

Ron Harper · Post #183 » by **Ron Harper** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:21 am

Knicks1214 wrote:
Ron Harper wrote:
MayoisMemphis wrote:Noah hasn't beasted any opponent. Perkins outplayed him in the Boston series and Shaq dominated him physically this year, he was literally 5 feet from the basket every time he even thought of backing down Noah

LOL, Noah averaged 15/13 against Shaq and the Cavs in the playoffs.

"I do not feel the need to verify what I say, I simply do not like this player, so let my opinion be fact"

My favorite type of poster <3

Shaq played half of what Noah did...to say that he "beasted Shaq" is way off. When they were matched up, if anything, Shaq played better than, or at least equal to, Noah. Yes, Noah played well against the Cavs, but did not beast Shaq.

Okay, fine, Shaq wasn't able to stay in the game. Though I don't think that bottom line helps the argument.

GaNGsTaRr93 · Post #184 » by **GaNGsTaRr93** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:45 am

Is it even worth is to trade for Melo ? With all these talks of going to NY ? He seems like a rental.

WeAreVenom · Post #185 » by **WeAreVenom** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:56 am

GaNGsTaRr93 wrote:Is it even worth is to trade for Melo ? With all these talks of going to NY ? He seems like a rental.

I can't imagine any team trading for him without getting some form of commitment from him.

ChiCitySPORTS#1 · Post #186 » by **ChiCitySPORTS#1** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:01 am

The Bulls nor the Knicks would deal for him without him signing an extension.

NBA Fan 1234 · Post #187 » by **NBA Fan 1234** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:03 am

ChiCitySPORTS#1 wrote:The Bulls nor the Knicks would deal for him without him signing an extension.

+1 No team would deal for Melo without an extension lol...and with good reason. Who wants to give up assets for a one-year rental?

stacey_is_king · Post #188 » by **stacey_is_king** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:10 am

Noah can't guard Shaq. He couldn't stop him from getting deep in the post, and Shaq abused him. I've watched every single Bulls for the past 3 years, and I'd be the first to tell you Noah can't handle big, strong C's. I don't know what these other Bulls fans are acting like we're saying something crazy...

Wade2k6 · Post #189 » by **Wade2k6** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:21 am

Chicago-Bull-E wrote:
Wade2k6 wrote:
Chicago-Bull-E wrote:Shaq: 9 ppg, 6 rpg, 51%, 2 apg
Noah: 15 ppg, 13 rpg, 53%, 3 apg

Noah sure got dominated.

Uhh, Noah should have much better numbers considering Shaq played 20 minutes a game while Noah played 37 minutes a game.

And that equates to dominating Noah how?

I never said he dominated Noah, but it's silly to compare their stats when one player is playing almost double the amount of minutes as the other.

tundraknight · Post #190 » by **tundraknight** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:22 am

Rose
Brewer
Melo
Boozer
Noah

That would be just as scary as the Heats starting line-up.

Hemingway · Post #191 » by **Hemingway** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:29 am

Chi shoud just get a trade done. I hear they dont want to part with Noah. For years now CHI has needed to package 2 or 3 fringe starter/star guys for one legit superstar. They have missed every opportunity thus far because they didn't want to part with someone. They should view Rose as the only untouchable. And If Billups comes too, maybe there is a deal where Rose is not off limits.

cool007 · Post #192 » by **cool007** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:38 am

Hemingway wrote:Chi shoud just get a trade done. I hear they dont want to part with Noah. For years now CHI has needed to package 2 or 3 fringe starter/star guys for one legit superstar. They have missed every opportunity thus far because they didn't want to part with someone. They should view Rose as the only untouchable. And If Billups comes too, maybe there is a deal where Rose is not off limits.

Huh???? What???

Post #193 » by **coldfish** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:39 am

Hemingway wrote:Chi shoud just get a trade done. I hear they dont want to part with Noah. For years now CHI has needed to package 2 or 3 fringe starter/star guys for one legit superstar. They have missed every opportunity thus far because they didn't want to part with someone. They should view Rose as the only untouchable. And If Billups comes too, maybe there is a deal where Rose is not off limits.

Teams don't upgrade themselves by trading Rose for Carmello. Teams upgrade themselves by trading Kwame Brown for Gasol or Jeff Green for Ray Allen. Chicago's biggest problem has been not being in the right place at the right time for one of those deals.

NOOB77 · Post #194 » by **NOOB77** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:43 am

HMMMMM Seeing how Melo is better than Rose how would that be a downgrade? Billups/Melo >> Rose/Deng

GaNGsTaRr93 · Post #195 » by **GaNGsTaRr93** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:45 am

HMMMMM Bulls throw away their future for a one year rental and a old point guard!!!!?!!??!!?!?!?!?!?!?

NOOB77 · Post #196 » by **NOOB77** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:56 am

What future?

Chicago-Bull-E · Post #197 » by **Chicago-Bull-E** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:11 am

phil77 wrote:What future?

obvious troll is obvious.

rico · Post #198 » by **rico** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:15 am

Dont know if anyone dropped this yet, but - http://twitter.com/AlexKennedyNBA/status/24037490434

that to me says theres no way they are getting NOAH in the deal or at least not noah and deng. But yeah noah is breakin the camels back. I know im a Chi Fan, but hes one of my favorite players in the league. I respect and love players like him who go all out every game, I also like that he doesnt take crap and says it like it is.

GaNGsTaRr93 · Post #199 » by **GaNGsTaRr93** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:16 am

Chicago-Bull-E wrote:
phil77 wrote:What future?

obvious troll is obvious.

U must of meant Obvious (Please Use More Appropriate Word) is (Please Use More Appropriate Word)

NOOB77 · Post #200 » by **NOOB77** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:25 am

I am a troll because I said Melo is better than Rose and the combo of Melo/Billups is better than Rose/Deng.