TheNewEra wrote:Wake the hell up people one damn season does not I repeat does not make you a top 2 center. How in the hell did Bogut become top center when guys like Gasol, Ming, Kaman, Lopez and others are on the same level if not some better.
It's not only been one season that he's been better than centers like Kaman and Lopez.
Bogut 09-10 Roland Rating: +8.0
08-09: +4.3
Kaman 07-08 Roland Rating: +3.8
08-09: -3.1
09-10: +0.5
Lopez 09-10 Roland Rating: +1.0
08-09: +1.6
Gasol is not applicable. Bynum's LA's center when healthy.
Ming didn't play for a year and will have his minutes heavily monitored. He's N/A also until we see how much he moves around and contribute.
You're reaching significantly here.
If your the number one pick your expectations are to be the best player in your class it may not be up to the player but it's his job coming in the league to prove he is the best.
What are expectations based on if not history? Otherwise they are impractical and should be disregarded. The list of #1 picks was supplied earlier and easily over half didn't wind up as the best player in their class. Therefore if you're requiring a number one pick to be the best in his class not to be classified as a bust then it's unreasonable. You may have the best pick in the draft, but there are 59 afterward. When dealing with an inexact science I'll take my chances with the latter rather than the former.
TheNewEra wrote:To be given Elite top 2 or 3 title I at least need some playoff games to show me something. Taking Granger had nothing to do with playoff experience.
It's all relative. Someone has to be given the distinction. It can't be vacant. Which centers have been close to as good or better in the regular and made an impact in the playoffs also. Lopez and Kaman certainly have not. No more double standards.