Trader_Joe wrote:Bill Bradley wrote:
We will see. I just think it's funny that the OP makes an apparent statement of fact that Denver minus Melo is better than NY plus Melo when the Knicks just beat Denver with their current squads.
Knicks have had some tough injuries to their best defenders that have messed up their already short rotation.
I did not say that.
You cannot just add Melo to the Knicks and take him off Denver and say NY is better.
This season Denver with Melo is better than NY.
Next season with Melo and whatever Denver may be able to land for their expirers, picks, assets, could also be better than what NY can put together.
If you add Melo to NY this season, it means you have to take away depth and role players from an already shallow NY team (some combination of Gallo, Fields, Chandler, AR). Next season would be a different story as a free agent, but you also don't know the moves Denver could pull in the meanwhile either.
No, your premise was that Denver would be able to field a better team than NY if Anthony went to NY in free agency. So NY would essentially be what they are now plus Melo. Sure, they would need to find a way to turn Chandler into a starting caliber young center or something along those lines, and some other minor changes would need to be made, but their core would stay in tact. Sure, Denver can make some moves but they will more or less be what they are now.