lovethewire wrote:Knowing what we know now, would the Knicks have been better had melo went to the nets? I ask because when the Utah GM came out afterwards saying whoever lost melo he would have started talk about d will so it very well could have been amare and d will which I personally think is a much better fit, thoughts?
Yup. Because NY already had Amare the need for a point guard was far greater than for another scorer. Of course the quality of player matters too, but DWill also had more impact in Utah than Melo did in Denver, so it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to look at Melo as a higher caliber player. At best, maybe Melo is DWill's equal, and Melo's strengths are quite redundant in NY. Major mistake.