First lockout victim?

GameOver25 · Post #101 » by **GameOver25** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:32 pm

I was positive they'd live happily ever after.

MF Doom · Post #102 » by **MF Doom** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:33 pm

magicman1978 wrote:I wouldn't. Not that I have high standards or anything (my first two wives didn't look as good as her) - just something about her doesn't do it for me.

So if she knocked on your door right now, you would say no?

Post #103 » by **Kilroy** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:34 pm

Hustlehard23 wrote:she's def a smashable girl, but she is NOT wifey material, put it all together, the fakeness, the lame personality(so far from down to earth) and the history that we KNOW of with her former partners, who would wife this hoe if they know whats she's about? I'm sure Humph got clowned, he's lucky for the lockout and there was no locker room cause they really would have lit into him

Oh Dude, you just KNOW he's going to get ruined for this now... It ain't even a question. His marriage didn't even last the lockout... This dude is going to go through absolute hell the first few months of the season. :lol:

Star-Lord · Post #104 » by **Star-Lord** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:35 pm

Dr Mufasa wrote:There is no way KK has a number anywhere under 100. There's a better chance of her being in the thousands like the female version of Charlie Sheen and Gene Simmons.

I truly believe most children of famous/connected people in Hollywood start getting on a coke and sex weekend binge starting anywhere from 12 to 14. Now think about how many Kardashian sisters there are and multiply the connections all of them made in Hollywood by the parties, which Kim would be invited to every one being the most attractive sister. Think about all the famous rappers, athletes, producers impressionable and wanting to get more connections 16 year old Kim Kardashian was introduced to

Oh, dear...

MF Doom wrote:
magicman1978 wrote:I wouldn't. Not that I have high standards or anything (my first two wives didn't look as good as her) - just something about her doesn't do it for me.

So if she knocked on your door right now, you would say no?

Not a chance in hell.

7-Day Dray · Post #105 » by **7-Day Dray** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:37 pm

For Hump's sake, I hope he signed that prenuptial agreement.

ThreeYearPlan · Post #106 » by **ThreeYearPlan** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:37 pm

why do people want to smash that when she's proven she's awful in bed?

KGboss · Post #107 » by **KGboss** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:37 pm

omg no i thought that would last forever and stuff....

So, Kim....can i smash?

Post #108 » by **Kilroy** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:38 pm

7-Day Dray wrote:For Hump's sake, I hope he signed that prenuptial agreement.

I'm sure he did but just like with Odom, it was written by Kim's Mom...

Post #109 » by **dockingsched** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:38 pm

7-Day Dray wrote:For Hump's sake, I hope he signed that prenuptial agreement.

he's worth 8mil, she's worth 30mil+

Blkbrd671 · Post #110 » by **Blkbrd671** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:41 pm

Really? she seemed like such a nice girl

Kobe 24 Revis · Post #111 » by **Kobe 24 Revis** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:42 pm

You spent too much on that ring Kris

-Kobe

Al Swearengen · Post #112 » by **Al Swearengen** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:43 pm

Chalk1 wrote:
Kilroy wrote:Te be honest that fist pick without makeup is one of the prettiest shots I've seen of her... Almost a little Jolie-esque...

Yep, she looks like a real chick. A girl next door.

Gotta agree too. She actually looks super cute without the makeup.

Optms · Post #113 » by **Optms** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:45 pm

MF Doom wrote:
magicman1978 wrote:I wouldn't. Not that I have high standards or anything (my first two wives didn't look as good as her) - just something about her doesn't do it for me.

So if she knocked on your door right now, you would say no?

Yup. I'd tap 99.9% of the chicks that are posted among these boards weekly. Kim Kardashian isn't one of them. Not trying to be one of those guys, I'm just saying. She's one of those chicks where she's got the body but sadly her personality along with voice irritate my brain at such a level that it burns in overdrive nullifying my junk from doing the thinking for the both of us.

hard49 · Post #114 » by **hard49** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:45 pm

panthermark wrote:This thread is kinda funny now...

The internet super pimps are out....

"I don't often take time off of RealGM to bang models and celebrities.....but when I do....I prefer perfect tens..."

I would hit far worse if their net worth was $30 million plus. :lol:

dznutzz · Post #115 » by **dznutzz** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:45 pm

she hit it n quit it

Teen Girl Squad · Post #116 » by **Teen Girl Squad** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:45 pm

I don't understand the title of this this thread. DIVORCE! in all caps with an exclamation mark implies an element of surprise, which frankly doesn't exist in this story.

Foye · Post #117 » by **Foye** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:47 pm

You know you have a lockout when this thread is not locked within 1 hour.

MF Doom · Post #118 » by **MF Doom** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:47 pm

Optms wrote:Yup. I'd tap 99.9% of the chicks that are posted among these boards weekly. Kim Kardashian isn't one of them. Not trying to be one of those guys, I'm just saying. She's one of those chicks where she's got the body but sadly her personality along with voice irritate my brain at such a level that it burns in overdrive nullifying my junk from doing the thinking for the both of us.

No one is saying marry her, just smash and dash.

Post #119 » by **Kilroy** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:50 pm

MF Doom wrote:
magicman1978 wrote:I wouldn't. Not that I have high standards or anything (my first two wives didn't look as good as her) - just something about her doesn't do it for me.

So if she knocked on your door right now, you would say no?

Does not telling the boys after count as a "No"... :lol:

Star-Lord · Post #120 » by **Star-Lord** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:51 pm

Where did 'smash' come from?

Such an unattractive euphemism.