Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard

Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199

Leor_77
Analyst
Posts: 3,218
And1: 533
Joined: Dec 09, 2010

Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#1 » by Leor_77 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:35 pm

Just listening to Los Angeles radio, and Eric Pincus, who is a very well-established/well-connected reporter here in LA (he's also one of the main guys on Hoopsworld), is talking about it right now.

Will update as I get more info from the interview.

He's saying that their only concern is his back surgery.
Gus McCrae
General Manager
Posts: 8,257
And1: 2,049
Joined: Dec 07, 2007
     

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#2 » by Gus McCrae » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:36 pm

pull the trigger
MannyRam99
Banned User
Posts: 3,321
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#3 » by MannyRam99 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:37 pm

good.

Dwight will extend next summer, I'm sure of it. Just get the deal done.

When Westbrook blows by Nash we will need Howard in the paint to meet him.
chubby_1_kenobi
Starter
Posts: 2,159
And1: 20
Joined: Aug 21, 2008

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#4 » by chubby_1_kenobi » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:37 pm

I think the FO are fools for taking this gamble if the report is true.
Cares
Sophomore
Posts: 240
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 23, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#5 » by Cares » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:37 pm

Hell no...sign that extension bitch!
EntropyPR
Banned User
Posts: 6,329
And1: 2,381
Joined: Dec 12, 2011

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#6 » by EntropyPR » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:38 pm

If he gets traded, and they win a Ship..he'll re-sgin.
nowetdio45
Sophomore
Posts: 157
And1: 41
Joined: Dec 13, 2011

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#7 » by nowetdio45 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:38 pm

Yea sign the extension or no trade

Sent from my SCH-i515
User avatar
Next Coming
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,956
And1: 1,625
Joined: Aug 17, 2004
Location: War Room

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#8 » by Next Coming » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:39 pm

Can't see him walking away from over 20M and the big endorsement deal he'll make for playing for one of the premier franchises in Sports.

He'll sign if they trade for him. It hasn't happened yet because he probably feels insecure about re-tracing Shaq's every move. You know he's starring in STEEL next.
NickPapagiorgio
Banned User
Posts: 405
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 28, 2011

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#9 » by NickPapagiorgio » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:39 pm

Leor_77 wrote:Just listening to Los Angeles radio, and Eric Pincus, who is a very well-established/well-connected reporter here in LA (he's also one of the main guys on Hoopsworld), is talking about it right now.

Will update as I get more info from the interview.


:lol: that guy is a well-known clown. Caused hysteria with his KG to LA done deal reports. And cmon, Poopsworld!?!?
Levity
Pro Prospect
Posts: 799
And1: 103
Joined: Dec 25, 2011
Location: Long Beach born and raised

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#10 » by Levity » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:39 pm

chubby_1_kenobi wrote:I think the FO are fools for taking this gamble if the report is true.


if LA did trade for dwight and he did leave, as so many posters are speculating; well, where do you see him going, realistically? most likely, brooklyn wont be an option by then.
User avatar
Flipdog69xxx
Rookie
Posts: 1,188
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 09, 2005
Location: Hawaii
         

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#11 » by Flipdog69xxx » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:40 pm

Cares wrote:Hell no...sign that extension bitch!
User avatar
ndnow
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,763
And1: 2,010
Joined: Feb 13, 2006
     

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#12 » by ndnow » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:41 pm

Is it worth the risk? Whose more of a liability with the injuries him or Bynum? Is there skill diff that big?
Cares
Sophomore
Posts: 240
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 23, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#13 » by Cares » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:41 pm

Lakers trade future 1st and 2nd rounders from 2025 + Bynum for Howard + extension... c'mon Mitch.
chubby_1_kenobi
Starter
Posts: 2,159
And1: 20
Joined: Aug 21, 2008

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#14 » by chubby_1_kenobi » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:41 pm

Don't do it, Mitch! This gamble is totally unnecessary.
User avatar
Zedders
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,741
And1: 613
Joined: Apr 27, 2012
       

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#15 » by Zedders » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:45 pm

Do it, Dwight won't have anywhere realistic to go and he'll never want to leave after he gets a taste of Hollywood.

You really think he'll turn his back and walk away from the Lakers?
User avatar
Frank Mulely
Head Coach
Posts: 6,847
And1: 649
Joined: Sep 04, 2009
Location: gone phishing

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#16 » by Frank Mulely » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:47 pm

MannyRam99 wrote:good.

Dwight will extend next summer, I'm sure of it. Just get the deal done.

When Westbrook blows by Nash we will need Howard in the paint to meet him.


I've been saying this. If they can trade Bynum straight up for Howard, Lakers have to do it.

Dwight ain't leaving a Lakers team with Kobe / Pau / Nash to play with Deron and Joe Johnson. c'mon son. Also, socal is just too fun for a 20-something superstar. He is NOT leaving if they trade for him, I don't care what anybody says, even him. He'll change his mind and sign a long term deal without a shadow of a doubt.
Shv3d wrote:
Frank Mulely wrote:Honestly if this was the 80s

The official motto of RealGM.
Gus McCrae
General Manager
Posts: 8,257
And1: 2,049
Joined: Dec 07, 2007
     

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#17 » by Gus McCrae » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:49 pm

^^
I agree AND I'm willing to take the risk. I don't think Gasol/Bynum is a good fit, there's too much inconsistency between them.
chubby_1_kenobi
Starter
Posts: 2,159
And1: 20
Joined: Aug 21, 2008

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#18 » by chubby_1_kenobi » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:53 pm

Levity wrote:
chubby_1_kenobi wrote:I think the FO are fools for taking this gamble if the report is true.


if LA did trade for dwight and he did leave, as so many posters are speculating; well, where do you see him going, realistically? most likely, brooklyn wont be an option by then.

Dallas would be my guess but who knows? When an unrestricted FA like Howard is on the market, crazy stuff are going to be happening with teams trying to clear cap space to sign him. The Lakers should not be a part of that wild goosechase after acquiring someone like Steve Nash. Keep it simple, keep it conservative.
User avatar
TruSkool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,706
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#19 » by TruSkool » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:55 pm

Mitch DONT do it, the lakers are very capable as is
Levity
Pro Prospect
Posts: 799
And1: 103
Joined: Dec 25, 2011
Location: Long Beach born and raised

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#20 » by Levity » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:59 pm

chubby_1_kenobi wrote:
Levity wrote:
chubby_1_kenobi wrote:I think the FO are fools for taking this gamble if the report is true.


if LA did trade for dwight and he did leave, as so many posters are speculating; well, where do you see him going, realistically? most likely, brooklyn wont be an option by then.

Dallas would be my guess but who knows? When an unrestricted FA like Howard is on the market, crazy stuff are going to be happening with teams trying to clear cap space to sign him. The Lakers should not be a part of that wild goosechase after acquiring someone like Steve Nash. Keep it simple, keep it conservative.


with the signing of nash, i see howard being very happy in LA. not only because nash is an all time great pg, but because dwight publicly said this season that he wants to play with nash. add that to the fact that LA will be able to pay him the most come free agency and that LA will certainly be a title contender, its hard to see dwight so willingly walk away from LA

Return to The General Board