Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199
Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,218
- And1: 533
- Joined: Dec 09, 2010
Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Just listening to Los Angeles radio, and Eric Pincus, who is a very well-established/well-connected reporter here in LA (he's also one of the main guys on Hoopsworld), is talking about it right now.
Will update as I get more info from the interview.
He's saying that their only concern is his back surgery.
Will update as I get more info from the interview.
He's saying that their only concern is his back surgery.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,257
- And1: 2,049
- Joined: Dec 07, 2007
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
pull the trigger
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,321
- And1: 33
- Joined: Apr 28, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
good.
Dwight will extend next summer, I'm sure of it. Just get the deal done.
When Westbrook blows by Nash we will need Howard in the paint to meet him.
Dwight will extend next summer, I'm sure of it. Just get the deal done.
When Westbrook blows by Nash we will need Howard in the paint to meet him.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,159
- And1: 20
- Joined: Aug 21, 2008
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
I think the FO are fools for taking this gamble if the report is true.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 240
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jul 23, 2010
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Hell no...sign that extension bitch!
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,329
- And1: 2,381
- Joined: Dec 12, 2011
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
If he gets traded, and they win a Ship..he'll re-sgin.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 157
- And1: 41
- Joined: Dec 13, 2011
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Yea sign the extension or no trade
Sent from my SCH-i515
Sent from my SCH-i515
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Next Coming
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,956
- And1: 1,625
- Joined: Aug 17, 2004
- Location: War Room
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Can't see him walking away from over 20M and the big endorsement deal he'll make for playing for one of the premier franchises in Sports.
He'll sign if they trade for him. It hasn't happened yet because he probably feels insecure about re-tracing Shaq's every move. You know he's starring in STEEL next.
He'll sign if they trade for him. It hasn't happened yet because he probably feels insecure about re-tracing Shaq's every move. You know he's starring in STEEL next.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 405
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 28, 2011
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Leor_77 wrote:Just listening to Los Angeles radio, and Eric Pincus, who is a very well-established/well-connected reporter here in LA (he's also one of the main guys on Hoopsworld), is talking about it right now.
Will update as I get more info from the interview.

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 799
- And1: 103
- Joined: Dec 25, 2011
- Location: Long Beach born and raised
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
chubby_1_kenobi wrote:I think the FO are fools for taking this gamble if the report is true.
if LA did trade for dwight and he did leave, as so many posters are speculating; well, where do you see him going, realistically? most likely, brooklyn wont be an option by then.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Flipdog69xxx
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,188
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 09, 2005
- Location: Hawaii
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Cares wrote:Hell no...sign that extension bitch!
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- ndnow
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,763
- And1: 2,010
- Joined: Feb 13, 2006
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Is it worth the risk? Whose more of a liability with the injuries him or Bynum? Is there skill diff that big?
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 240
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jul 23, 2010
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Lakers trade future 1st and 2nd rounders from 2025 + Bynum for Howard + extension... c'mon Mitch.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,159
- And1: 20
- Joined: Aug 21, 2008
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Don't do it, Mitch! This gamble is totally unnecessary.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Zedders
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,741
- And1: 613
- Joined: Apr 27, 2012
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Do it, Dwight won't have anywhere realistic to go and he'll never want to leave after he gets a taste of Hollywood.
You really think he'll turn his back and walk away from the Lakers?
You really think he'll turn his back and walk away from the Lakers?
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Frank Mulely
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,847
- And1: 649
- Joined: Sep 04, 2009
- Location: gone phishing
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
MannyRam99 wrote:good.
Dwight will extend next summer, I'm sure of it. Just get the deal done.
When Westbrook blows by Nash we will need Howard in the paint to meet him.
I've been saying this. If they can trade Bynum straight up for Howard, Lakers have to do it.
Dwight ain't leaving a Lakers team with Kobe / Pau / Nash to play with Deron and Joe Johnson. c'mon son. Also, socal is just too fun for a 20-something superstar. He is NOT leaving if they trade for him, I don't care what anybody says, even him. He'll change his mind and sign a long term deal without a shadow of a doubt.
Shv3d wrote:Frank Mulely wrote:Honestly if this was the 80s
The official motto of RealGM.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,257
- And1: 2,049
- Joined: Dec 07, 2007
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
^^
I agree AND I'm willing to take the risk. I don't think Gasol/Bynum is a good fit, there's too much inconsistency between them.
I agree AND I'm willing to take the risk. I don't think Gasol/Bynum is a good fit, there's too much inconsistency between them.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,159
- And1: 20
- Joined: Aug 21, 2008
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Levity wrote:chubby_1_kenobi wrote:I think the FO are fools for taking this gamble if the report is true.
if LA did trade for dwight and he did leave, as so many posters are speculating; well, where do you see him going, realistically? most likely, brooklyn wont be an option by then.
Dallas would be my guess but who knows? When an unrestricted FA like Howard is on the market, crazy stuff are going to be happening with teams trying to clear cap space to sign him. The Lakers should not be a part of that wild goosechase after acquiring someone like Steve Nash. Keep it simple, keep it conservative.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- TruSkool
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,706
- And1: 253
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Mitch DONT do it, the lakers are very capable as is
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 799
- And1: 103
- Joined: Dec 25, 2011
- Location: Long Beach born and raised
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
chubby_1_kenobi wrote:Levity wrote:chubby_1_kenobi wrote:I think the FO are fools for taking this gamble if the report is true.
if LA did trade for dwight and he did leave, as so many posters are speculating; well, where do you see him going, realistically? most likely, brooklyn wont be an option by then.
Dallas would be my guess but who knows? When an unrestricted FA like Howard is on the market, crazy stuff are going to be happening with teams trying to clear cap space to sign him. The Lakers should not be a part of that wild goosechase after acquiring someone like Steve Nash. Keep it simple, keep it conservative.
with the signing of nash, i see howard being very happy in LA. not only because nash is an all time great pg, but because dwight publicly said this season that he wants to play with nash. add that to the fact that LA will be able to pay him the most come free agency and that LA will certainly be a title contender, its hard to see dwight so willingly walk away from LA