New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread

Moderators: Morten Jensen, Blame Rasho, magnumt, tsherkin, Flash3, UGA Hayes, Yuri Vaultin, Mark K, Doctor MJ, NO-KG-AI

User avatar
sportjames23
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,405
And1: 22
Joined: Dec 09, 2011

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#106 » by sportjames23 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:15 pm

tsherkin wrote:Lots of people have run into trouble with the new rules, it's not really something appropriate for discussion with other posters, though.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9700 using Tapatalk



LOL, the man ain't joking, right tsherkin? :lol:

Wish I would have paid attention to this thread earlier. :wink:
User avatar
sportjames23
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,405
And1: 22
Joined: Dec 09, 2011

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#107 » by sportjames23 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:17 pm

putyouonthegame wrote:i don't have a problem with rules on a website.

but i always found realgm policies to be on the stricter side. Some of the mods can get power hungry very easily and quickly. Why is that?


http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/abso ... utely.html

*runs out the thread*
User avatar
BrotherDave
General Manager
Posts: 8,137
And1: 1,198
Joined: May 20, 2009
       

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#108 » by BrotherDave » Mon Oct 22, 2012 5:06 pm

The Forum rules read like the Obamacare Bill. I think it would behoove the board greatly if it was much more concise and less vague. For example, a clear and objective definition of "derailment" would be great b/c mods seem all over the place with what is a derailing post/gif.

Like in terms of gifs, you say you want to put a stop to the "U Mad and the others" but "the others" is pretty open to interpretation.

For example,
I got warned once for posting a gif of Tracy Morgan passionately saying "no" repeatedly. I could have just posted "no, a thousand times no" but I felt like Mr Morgan summed up my opinion better than words could have and much more comically. The mod I quoted (which was really my first mistake b/c you have to really tread softly around mods I have thusly learned) thought I was baiting him and derailing the thread when all I was trying to do was express my disagreement of his opinion in a humorous and accurate fashion.

I honestly couldn't understand the plethora of "violations" he cited me for b/c the rules were so cluttered, vague, and open for interpretation.
I thought Royce White was worth a late 1st round/early 2nd pick by the worst team in NBA history.
User avatar
putyouonthegame
Senior
Posts: 669
And1: 20
Joined: Nov 09, 2011

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#109 » by putyouonthegame » Wed Oct 24, 2012 8:49 pm

this forum has become a joke seriously..

topics getting locked for no reason...trolling on every single post.

and every week, more rules are being enforced..

damn right a joke.
DEEP3CL wrote:All you haters better celebrate now, cause it won't last. When it starts to click this board will be crickets like it was in 2009 and 2010 on a nightly basis.
tsherkin
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 58,748
And1: 4,242
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#110 » by tsherkin » Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:25 am

Topics do not get locked without reason. The #1 reason a thread gets locked is that it was posted in the wrong forum, usually belonging to the PC Board and rather obviously at that.

Beyond incorrect forum location, the next big one I see is an obvious bait of a fanbase, which is a ne ne on the forums. The GB has a lot of low-quality posters, many of whom are outright trolls there to do nothing but cause trouble, so it should hardly come as a surprise that the rules there are more strict. It is unfortunate that we have to be so aggressive in our approach as mods, since there are plenty of other boards on RealGM where this is not the case, but it is necessary.

Meantime, in response to the Tracy Morgan post, one-off responses like that aren't just breaking GIF policy, they are essentially post pads that do not contribute meaningfully to the conversation. You want to open up with "no, a thousand times no," then that's great, but unless you back it up with substance, you're likely to run into some trouble, at least on the GB.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9700 using Tapatalk
DEAN GARRETT!!!
User avatar
BrotherDave
General Manager
Posts: 8,137
And1: 1,198
Joined: May 20, 2009
       

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#111 » by BrotherDave » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:12 pm

tsherkin wrote:contribute meaningfully to the conversation.

This is what I'm talking about though. "Meaningfully" (or contribute, for that matter) is extremely subjective in nature. Unless care is taken to delineate what constitutes as meaningful and what is not than you're only going to invite inconsistency because what is a meaningful post to one person isn't meaningful to another. I could go through every other post and report them as non meaningful.

I wholeheartedly applaud an effort to moderate the GB better but I'm concerned that you're wasting your efforts by just building a foundation upon mud.
I thought Royce White was worth a late 1st round/early 2nd pick by the worst team in NBA history.
tsherkin
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 58,748
And1: 4,242
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#112 » by tsherkin » Fri Oct 26, 2012 11:08 am

BrotherDave wrote:This is what I'm talking about though. "Meaningfully" (or contribute, for that matter) is extremely subjective in nature. Unless care is taken to delineate what constitutes as meaningful and what is not than you're only going to invite inconsistency because what is a meaningful post to one person isn't meaningful to another. I could go through every other post and report them as non meaningful.


You're not wrong, there is intentional wiggle room for the moderators so that we can have our policy evolve as necessary. We discuss actions and interpretations regularly, however, so I'd worry more about maintaining decorum than any kind of moderator issues. The GB has become a festering wellspring of foolishness and that is what necessitated this harsh policy. It's not designed to be flowery and pleasant.

Having said that, you also need to understand that if once every now and again you make a one-word post that isn't profane or baiting or whatever, we're not slavering at the end of the leash to get you and it won't lead to Read-Only Access. Unless the poster establishes a habit of chronic derailing and lack of contribution. We're looking to sift problem posters, not casual folks who don't write books with each post.


Sent from my BlackBerry 9700 using Tapatalk
DEAN GARRETT!!!
User avatar
oaklandwarriors
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,942
And1: 550
Joined: May 29, 2011
   

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#113 » by oaklandwarriors » Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:18 am

Instead of locking a thread that's posted in the wrong section why not move it to the other forum and inform the OP that he needs to post it in the correct section. If he does it again (for example making another PC thread on the GB) then you can take further action. I think that would make more sense than just locking threads because they are in the wrong section.
tsherkin
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 58,748
And1: 4,242
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#114 » by tsherkin » Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:22 am

We tried, for years, just moving the threads. We're tired of it, since it did nothing to raise awareness. If people are complaining about it, then they are noticing it, which means we will continue locking threads posted to the incorrect forum.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9700 using Tapatalk
DEAN GARRETT!!!
User avatar
Jase
RealGM
Posts: 13,054
And1: 148
Joined: Aug 01, 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI.

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#115 » by Jase » Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:15 pm

I think the idea, in theory, is very good. Cleaning up the boards has been years in the making, though I realize also that the Mods have worked hard in that time trying to maintain order and balance. I don't expect these changes to really kick in consistently right away, as most posters have spent years used to the way RealGM "was" run. The biggest problem I see, currently, especially last night (opening night and all) is trolling, and I don't really know how much can be done about that. There is a clear and apparent lack of objectivity ("my fan base is always right, and better than yours, etc.") that opens the door to harsh and volatile responses.

Still, I think the forums are clearly better just by lacking in the "U Mad"-type posts/pics.
"A winner listens. A loser just waits until it's their turn to talk."
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 34,819
And1: 4,123
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#116 » by BadMofoPimp » Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:20 pm

There will always be trolling of some form. It dies down after a few warnings. I remember when similar threads were moved all the time instead of locked. That is much more work and confusing. It is easier for the mods to put in a last post on the thread stating why it is being locked because of a redundant thread so people know why it has happened than to see their thread disappear to another forum or merged with another thread which really confused the heck out of finding my old posts. Mods are doing fine with their resources. If only they could bring back the Search function from our old posts like they had back in the olden days. It was awesome to pull stuff back up to talk trash about years later.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
Sofia
Queen of The GOTB
Posts: 11,716
And1: 3,746
Joined: Aug 03, 2008
Location: Formerly Mats272-Goat until I found Sofia The First...

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#117 » by Sofia » Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:33 pm

What's the stance on 'blank quoting' to agree with a post? Also, 'lol' posts or just smiley replies?

There still seems to be plenty of these cluttering threads, I thought that was the reason for the introduction of 'and 1'
Image
HowardMass wrote:Earlier this month, I got a brief scare when some P.O.S. said and I quote "Jugs is dead"
EArl: You are to make a post apologizing for your actions to Jugs.
tsherkin
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 58,748
And1: 4,242
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#118 » by tsherkin » Fri Nov 2, 2012 12:53 pm

Smiley-only posts should be getting an informal PM reminder, then an official warning, then a 12-hr on repeat offense (and depending on poster history, progression towards longer suspensions/bans for derailing).

We'll have to discuss blank-quoting, but that'd be basically a +1 post-pad, and is frowned upon, in theory.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9700 using Tapatalk
DEAN GARRETT!!!
Cool_Dude
Junior
Posts: 419
And1: 23
Joined: Jul 22, 2012

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#119 » by Cool_Dude » Sun Nov 4, 2012 11:46 pm

tsherkin wrote:Smiley-only posts should be getting an informal PM reminder, then an official warning, then a 12-hr on repeat offense (and depending on poster history, progression towards longer suspensions/bans for derailing).

We'll have to discuss blank-quoting, but that'd be basically a +1 post-pad, and is frowned upon, in theory.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9700 using Tapatalk

Wait, so you can't reply with a " :lol: " to a funny post, even in good fun on your own team's board?
tsherkin
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 58,748
And1: 4,242
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#120 » by tsherkin » Sun Nov 4, 2012 11:59 pm

Cool_Dude wrote:Wait, so you can't reply with a " :lol: " to a funny post, even in good fun on your own team's board?


What? What you do on your own board is between you and the mods local to that board; this thread is about the GenBoard's policy.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9700 using Tapatalk
DEAN GARRETT!!!
Cool_Dude
Junior
Posts: 419
And1: 23
Joined: Jul 22, 2012

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#121 » by Cool_Dude » Mon Nov 5, 2012 12:36 am

tsherkin wrote:
Cool_Dude wrote:Wait, so you can't reply with a " :lol: " to a funny post, even in good fun on your own team's board?


What? What you do on your own board is between you and the mods local to that board; this thread is about the GenBoard's policy.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9700 using Tapatalk

Oh, ok never mind.
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Veteran
Posts: 2,801
And1: 934
Joined: Sep 06, 2010

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#122 » by Clyde Frazier » Tue Nov 6, 2012 12:51 pm

Enjoying my time on the forum so far. I guess i'll have to get used to this whole locking threads thing.

I saw a thread about bosh scoring 40 get locked because it should be discussed in the game day thread. Do all mods agree with this? Seems when a player has a big night, it would be easier to discuss it in its own thread. Otherwise, discussion just gets lost when there were other games played that night.

Just curious.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 34,819
And1: 4,123
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#123 » by BadMofoPimp » Tue Nov 6, 2012 12:56 pm

Actually, I slightly agree with Clyde on the Bosh thread. Because, if his big night was discussed for only a page or two of a 30 page thread, then people would have to search through all the pages to find that discussion. It has happened to me before.

On the other hand, Clyde will find that each board is moderated uniquely in that mods on each board have their own ways of moderating. Heck, I had one of my posts disappear by a mod once.

The thing is to not take it personally which some do. When it happens to me, I find it funny and go on with my day.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
UGA Hayes
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 13,698
And1: 568
Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Location: real gm

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#124 » by UGA Hayes » Wed Nov 7, 2012 11:25 pm

I think the best way to handle a players individual night is to start a player of the day thread. Unless a game is close to historically good don't start a separate topic on it. There are ten great games a nice, we don't need a separate thread for all of them.
Shot Clock
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,240
And1: 954
Joined: Aug 20, 2009

Re: New General NBA Forum Policy Questions Thread 

Post#125 » by Shot Clock » Fri Nov 9, 2012 8:09 pm

So what's with deleting threads (or moving them to some private forum) solely because some things were said in the thread that turned out wrong. People are always digging up old threads and we laugh at them and ourselves for saying things that seemed reasonable at the time but now look silly.

My guess is this happened solely because a mod was one of the people making such statements. It's really sad if this stuff is going to start here. I've seen other boards fall apart with Mods picking and choosing where to use their magic wand.

There was nothing inflammatory or in any way violating board rules. Just the same funny comments I see people adding to their sigs all the time with no issues.

Return to The General Board