The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II

Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris

Floater
Junior
Posts: 398
And1: 43
Joined: Mar 25, 2012

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#941 » by Floater » Sat Jan 5, 2013 5:38 pm

Beal passes the eye test for me. He's a smart player and he's gonna be really good in this league. Takes smart shots that will start to fall as he gains more and more confidence.
User avatar
XtotheDeezy
Veteran
Posts: 2,711
And1: 1,790
Joined: Apr 14, 2010
 

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#942 » by XtotheDeezy » Sat Jan 5, 2013 5:39 pm

I admit that I am eating crow. I thought Beal was going to be a bad pick and his poor start to the season re-affirmed that thought, but now he's doing well and if John Wall can stay healthy, they've got a sick back court.
User avatar
TheKingOfVa360
General Manager
Posts: 8,326
And1: 1,663
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Orange County, California
         

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#943 » by TheKingOfVa360 » Sat Jan 5, 2013 5:40 pm

Scout Taron wrote:Dion Waiters is in the same position..And they're shooting the exact same percentage with very similar stats overall.

So.........


Waiters is like 3 years older and his shot selection isn't great. Beal was missing good wide open shots that are now falling. You have to watch him to understand that not just comb through box scores. Plus Beal is already an above average defender at 19 years old.
RipCity71252
Pro Prospect
Posts: 793
And1: 194
Joined: Jul 19, 2008
Location: Just South of Rip City

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#944 » by RipCity71252 » Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:23 am

I don't know about Beal. They way we moves around the court, he can look pretty sluggish at times. He has a pretty form, but it's pretty deliberate right now which affects his accuracy when he's closely guarded. If he has space and is allowed to get a rhythm dribble in off of a hand off or screen, he's shooting looks pretty good though.

The worry I have with him is his ball handling. He's not really that advanced here which I think might hinder his ability to be a great scorer. Ball handling is tough to improve significantly also. He'll get better, but I don't envision him ever being an isolation type player and could limit his effectiveness in the pnr.

He has enough talent to be a nice third option on a good team with his solid if not spectacular offensive game and his good D (doesn't really have the physical profile to be anymore than that), just not sure if that's what you shoot for out of a third pick.

He's really young though so it should be interesting to see how much he develops.
User avatar
ComboGuardCity
RealGM
Posts: 25,580
And1: 4,547
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#945 » by ComboGuardCity » Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:25 am

TheKingOfVa360 wrote:
Scout Taron wrote:Dion Waiters is in the same position..And they're shooting the exact same percentage with very similar stats overall.

So.........


Waiters is like 3 years older and his shot selection isn't great. Beal was missing good wide open shots that are now falling. You have to watch him to understand that not just comb through box scores. Plus Beal is already an above average defender at 19 years old.

Actually 18 months. He was missing wide open shots at UF as well. That's why those Ray Allen comparisons never made any sense. Now you're using a <5 game sample size to call them good shots?
TheBigThree
Starter
Posts: 2,133
And1: 124
Joined: Mar 20, 2008

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#946 » by TheBigThree » Sun Jan 6, 2013 12:56 am

ComboGuardCity wrote:Actually 18 months. He was missing wide open shots at UF as well. That's why those Ray Allen comparisons never made any sense. Now you're using a <5 game sample size to call them good shots?

What point are you arguing? Is he a chucker taking bad shots? Or are they wide open shots that any NBA player should be able to knock down?

It's certainly the latter for Beal, and he's starting to hit them. I can probably count on one hand the amount of bad shots he's taken this year. Believe me, the one thing you can't lecture Wizards fans about is what is a good and a bad shot. We've consistently had a team of players who couldn't tell the difference if their life depended on it.

Beal isn't one of those players. That said, he needs to continue this streak and make it the norm. I would agree with you at some point they will become bad shots if he just can't knock them down reliably, but it's way too early in his career to make that assertion.

RipCity: You're dead on regarding his handles. He needs to clean things up there, if possible. If anything prevents him from being an all star caliber two guard, it's his lack of ability to put the ball on the floor and average foot speed.
User avatar
Mr. Krabs
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,537
And1: 249
Joined: Feb 24, 2008
 

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#947 » by Mr. Krabs » Sun Jan 6, 2013 1:59 am

Only watched him a couple of times, but Bradley's game and skillset reminded me of Ben Gordon, do you think it's a fair comparison?
User avatar
ComboGuardCity
RealGM
Posts: 25,580
And1: 4,547
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#948 » by ComboGuardCity » Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:35 am

TheBigThree wrote:
ComboGuardCity wrote:Actually 18 months. He was missing wide open shots at UF as well. That's why those Ray Allen comparisons never made any sense. Now you're using a <5 game sample size to call them good shots?

What point are you arguing? Is he a chucker taking bad shots? Or are they wide open shots that any NBA player should be able to knock down?

It's certainly the latter for Beal, and he's starting to hit them. I can probably count on one hand the amount of bad shots he's taken this year. Believe me, the one thing you can't lecture Wizards fans about is what is a good and a bad shot. We've consistently had a team of players who couldn't tell the difference if their life depended on it.

Beal isn't one of those players. That said, he needs to continue this streak and make it the norm. I would agree with you at some point they will become bad shots if he just can't knock them down reliably, but it's way too early in his career to make that assertion.

RipCity: You're dead on regarding his handles. He needs to clean things up there, if possible. If anything prevents him from being an all star caliber two guard, it's his lack of ability to put the ball on the floor and average foot speed.

I'm saying that even though he's open, maybe its still not a good shot. It reminds of the Pistons and rodney stuckey. He's always open from 3, but nobody wants him shooting that shot because he's a terrible shooter. Beal has run a string of 3 nice shooting games. Let's see if he can sustain it somewhat before we say he's a consistent shooter taking good shots. I like Beal because he plays defense. This isn't trashing him, it's just what I observed.
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,733
And1: 2,652
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#949 » by BrooklynBulls » Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:47 am

Mr. Krabs wrote:Only watched him a couple of times, but Bradley's game and skillset reminded me of Ben Gordon, do you think it's a fair comparison?


Bradley Beal? No. He's not really Gordon at all. Gordon is a smaller, less athletic player with a deadeye jumpshot who worked best with the ball in his hands, and had fantastic dribble moves to free himself on the perimeter, but lacked touch and decision-making at the basket, and whose passing was simply atrocious for the first part of his career.

Beal's a much more in-the-flow, dont force anything player who is probably better off ball at this point in his career, with more athleticism, length, and generally better instincts.

Maybe in terms of player quality, they'll turn out comparable. But they're pretty different as types.
User avatar
Hero
RealGM
Posts: 38,052
And1: 53,364
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
Location: Edward Gardens
 

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#950 » by Hero » Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:54 am

Beal deserves the benefit of the doubt since he's playing for Washington which lacks talent and is a toxic team. It's good to see him doing better this year but it's a very small sample size so we need to see more. From what I've seen he hasn't been as good a shot as advertised. I remember on draft night so much was made of how he was a pure shooter and the next Ray Allen but I don't see it..
User avatar
junot111
General Manager
Posts: 9,045
And1: 2,817
Joined: Jan 31, 2007

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#951 » by junot111 » Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:59 am

Lol I remember at the beginning of the year when Waiters was shooting 50+% from 3pt and everyone was jizzing their pants, I stated that was fool's gold and someone called me a hater. Look at his numbers now...
User avatar
Optms
RealGM
Posts: 21,081
And1: 16,959
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#952 » by Optms » Sun Jan 6, 2013 2:59 am

His shots haven't fallen but he looked incredible in that highlight clip (Beal).

Looked much more veteran than rookie looking for his shot. What I enjoyed the most was his shot selection, it was a nice change of pace to see him mix his shots up. Not just stand at the top of the arc and chuck threes. Nothing was forced and he moved great without the ball to get his shots. Very good looking form on his shot as well. Kid has a bright future in this league and probably sooner rather than later the moment Wall gets back.
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 33,372
And1: 18,963
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#953 » by DusterBuster » Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:24 am

Lillard got his shooting stroke back tonight. 20pts (7-14FG / 3-5 from 3), 6asts and 4rebs.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
Malapropism
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,236
And1: 1,411
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
 

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#954 » by Malapropism » Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:26 am

Why has Davis played only 12 minutes today?
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 33,372
And1: 18,963
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#955 » by DusterBuster » Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:07 am

Malapropism wrote:Why has Davis played only 12 minutes today?


I was just about to ask that myself.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
sir G Wallace
Banned User
Posts: 2,197
And1: 73
Joined: Jan 02, 2012

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#956 » by sir G Wallace » Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:39 am

Seriously nobody has the damn answer to why Davis played just 12 minutes? It is not even in the ESPN recap.
menten
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,843
And1: 1,013
Joined: Dec 21, 2011

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#957 » by menten » Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:40 am

i watched the hornets game. he got in foul trouble early and then sucked when he came back in. anderson end jason smith especially were shooting the lights out in the 2nd half
User avatar
witnessraps
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 4,656
Joined: Sep 08, 2010
Location: bruno bandwagon
   

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#958 » by witnessraps » Sun Jan 6, 2013 4:58 am

sir G Wallace wrote:Seriously nobody has the damn answer to why Davis played just 12 minutes? It is not even in the ESPN recap.


19 year old rookie

the coach felt he had a better chance to win with other players tonight.
crowd goes wild
Junior
Posts: 309
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 11, 2008

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#959 » by crowd goes wild » Sun Jan 6, 2013 5:54 am

Malapropism wrote:Why has Davis played only 12 minutes today?


Foul trouble and I don't think Monty wanted him on Dirk. Plus Jason Smith had the hot hand
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 15,108
And1: 6,730
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#960 » by DowJones » Sun Jan 6, 2013 6:02 am

Waiters needs to improve for sure, but he has shown flashes. He is a rookie that needs to learn the difference between a good shot and a bad shot. He will never be D-Wade, but he can be a very productive NBA player.

Return to The General Board