The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II

Moderators: Morten Jensen, Flash3, magnumt, Blame Rasho, tsherkin, Knickstape1214, Yuri Vaultin, NO-KG-AI

User avatar
He Filled it Up
Starter
Posts: 2,078
And1: 512
Joined: Feb 12, 2009

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1351 » by He Filled it Up » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:56 am

r0cd0gg wrote:nobody else is even top 20 in both

I see Splitter on both lists...
Count that baby and a foul!
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 31,996
And1: 1,998
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The lost city of New Orleans

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1352 » by NO-KG-AI » Tue Jan 22, 2013 2:32 am

Drummond doesn't look 297 at all. He actually looks less than the 279 or whatever he was at. He looks way more active and energetic than he was last year.

I missed the Hornets game tonight, but Davis was 5-7 for 11 points, 6 rebounds, 3 blocks and one steal in 15 minutes. He had no turnovers and no fouls, I guess it was because Ryan Anderson was 7-14 from downtown that they kept him out :dontknow:
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
mid-post
Analyst
Posts: 3,597
And1: 64
Joined: May 06, 2010
Location: rock-afire explosion

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1353 » by mid-post » Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:49 am


At about 2:50 in this video he says he's at 270 after losing 22 pounds. That would have put him in the 290s at UConn. He weighed 279 (7.5% body fat) at the predraft camp, so who knows, maybe he put a lot of that weight back on. Either way, dude is unreal.

And it's pretty funny to see how pissed he gets when people bring up his motor and all that in the predraft interviews. :lol: #redflags #characterissues
sir G Wallace
Banned User
Posts: 2,197
And1: 69
Joined: Jan 02, 2012

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1354 » by sir G Wallace » Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:18 am

Maybe Drummond has been doing different core excercises which increased his weight but made him look more well shaped as well
User avatar
GhostsOfGil
General Manager
Posts: 8,500
And1: 895
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1355 » by GhostsOfGil » Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:38 am

Beal vs Lillard... turned out to be a stinker. 2-17 shooting between the 2 of them so far.
branny
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 27
Joined: Jun 01, 2012

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1356 » by branny » Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:06 am

GhostsOfGil wrote:Beal vs Lillard... turned out to be a stinker. 2-17 shooting between the 2 of them so far.

Was hoping for better.. :(
TheBigThree
Starter
Posts: 2,119
And1: 110
Joined: Mar 20, 2008

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1357 » by TheBigThree » Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:21 am

Lillard turned it on in the 4th, Beal didn't really get the chance because Crawford came in hot.
User avatar
nin10doe
Sophomore
Posts: 218
And1: 133
Joined: Mar 20, 2010

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1358 » by nin10doe » Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:32 am

NO-KG-AI wrote:Drummond doesn't look 297 at all. He actually looks less than the 279 or whatever he was at. He looks way more active and energetic than he was last year.

I missed the Hornets game tonight, but Davis was 5-7 for 11 points, 6 rebounds, 3 blocks and one steal in 15 minutes. He had no turnovers and no fouls, I guess it was because Ryan Anderson was 7-14 from downtown that they kept him out :dontknow:

Davis stepped on a ref's foot and sprained his ankle in the 2nd quarter. Sucks because he's been playing great lately and was off to a great start vs. Sacto. Its the same ankle that kept him out of games earlier this year. He says its not serious and he shouldn't miss any games, though.
dpnim
Sophomore
Posts: 203
And1: 79
Joined: May 03, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
 

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1359 » by dpnim » Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:27 am

Being a Blazer fan isn't exactly healthy.
User avatar
Shem
RealGM
Posts: 12,028
And1: 1,678
Joined: Dec 15, 2009
     

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1360 » by Shem » Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:25 am

April 4, 2014:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:I never said Dallas was good as Portland


Earlier on December 8, 2013:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:That's the Whole Point Portland is No better than Dallas
Goldtop
Banned User
Posts: 4,941
And1: 163
Joined: Dec 18, 2011

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1361 » by Goldtop » Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:50 am

Bskey wrote:
Blkbrd671 wrote:idk, but when you have Tyson Chandler at the top of any offensive statistical ratings list, imo doesn't really hold a lot of weight


It certainly needs to be put into context. Drummond is NOT a top 10 offensive player, not even close.

That however is a good indication that he's succeeding where he needs to atm.


The thing is I think you guys are just defining great offensive players in terms of their individual scoring talent, like its streetball. This rating system is based on what impact players have on the team offense as a whole, which is actually a more accurate way to rank players, imo.

For instance, I think they give credit to players who get offensive rebounds that lead to pts for their team, even if they techincally didn't score or make the assist. But that offensive rebound was crucial to getting those pts. So they rightfully give some credit to that player too. And thats likely how players like Drummond and Chandler are rated as top offensive players because of their offensive rebounds, as well as all their dunks.

If we're talking about ranking the top 10 offensive players that would win a 1 on 1 tournament, then no Drummond or Chandler would not be on that list. But if we're talking about biggest impact players to a TEAM offense, which is really how offensive players should be judged, then I think this rating system is valid.

Take Chandler off the Knicks, taking away the bulk of their offensive rebs, and see how many pts NY scores when they only get 1 shot per posession. So technically he is a top offensive player if he's having that much impact on a teams offense. He may never win a 1 on 1 tournament like Carmelo, but NBA is a team game.

"Offensive Rating" is a statistic used in basketball to measure an individual player's efficiency at producing points for the offense. It was created by author and statistician Dean Oliver.

For players, the formula is: Offensive Rating = (Points Produced / Individual Possessions) x 100

Points can be produced through field goals, free throws, assists, and offensive rebounds. Individual possessions are the sum of a player's scoring possessions (field goals, free throws, plus partial credit for assists), missed field goals and free throws that the defense rebounds, and turnovers.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offensive_rating
User avatar
mcfly1204
Head Coach
Posts: 7,479
And1: 934
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1362 » by mcfly1204 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:19 pm

That just means those players are efficient, it does not say whether or not they are impact players on offense.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
mitrandil20
Pro Prospect
Posts: 776
And1: 96
Joined: Jun 24, 2012

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1363 » by mitrandil20 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:45 pm

Wow, I saw Drummond's highlights; I can't believe he has that body and is that elite in athleticism: strength, power, leaping, agility..
User avatar
Shem
RealGM
Posts: 12,028
And1: 1,678
Joined: Dec 15, 2009
     

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1364 » by Shem » Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:49 pm

April 4, 2014:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:I never said Dallas was good as Portland


Earlier on December 8, 2013:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:That's the Whole Point Portland is No better than Dallas
User avatar
Jon1798
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,741
And1: 180
Joined: Feb 15, 2005

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1365 » by Jon1798 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:07 am

Just for kicks:

Anthony Davis(19 years old)
20th in the league in PER
4th amongst PF's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
16.2 PPG
9.8 rebounds
2.4 blocks
1.4 steals
1.7 TO's
51.9% FG

Damian Lillard(22 years old)
90th in the league in PER
22nd amongst PG's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
17.1 PPG
6.2 assists
.9 steals
2.8 TO's
42% FG

Andre Drummond(19 years old)
11th in the league in PER
2nd amongst C's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
13.6 PPG
13.3 rebounds
2.9 blocks
1.6 steals
1.5 TO's
60.7% FG


Discuss......
Image
User avatar
fishnc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,083
And1: 448
Joined: Dec 18, 2007

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1366 » by fishnc » Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:18 am

Jon1798 wrote:Just for kicks:

Anthony Davis(19 years old)
20th in the league in PER
4th amongst PF's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
16.2 PPG
9.8 rebounds
2.4 blocks
1.4 steals
1.7 TO's
51.9% FG

Damian Lillard(22 years old)
90th in the league in PER
22nd amongst PG's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
17.1 PPG
6.2 assists
.9 steals
2.8 TO's
42% FG

Andre Drummond(19 years old)
11th in the league in PER
2nd amongst C's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
13.6 PPG
13.3 rebounds
2.9 blocks
1.6 steals
1.5 TO's
60.7% FG


Discuss......


My first thought is...why would you use Per 36? And then I thought, oh, because it makes your guy look better.
Ziggy Stardust
Banned User
Posts: 1,220
And1: 96
Joined: Jan 17, 2012

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1367 » by Ziggy Stardust » Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:29 am

Jon1798 wrote:Just for kicks:

Anthony Davis(19 years old)
20th in the league in PER
4th amongst PF's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
16.2 PPG
9.8 rebounds
2.4 blocks
1.4 steals
1.7 TO's
51.9% FG

Damian Lillard(22 years old)
90th in the league in PER
22nd amongst PG's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
17.1 PPG
6.2 assists
.9 steals
2.8 TO's
42% FG

Andre Drummond(19 years old)
11th in the league in PER
2nd amongst C's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
13.6 PPG
13.3 rebounds
2.9 blocks
1.6 steals
1.5 TO's
60.7% FG


Discuss......


After reading this thread, those stats really reaffirm the prospect that Davis was/is. A big, athletic freak like Drummond performs 100% over expectations, but Davis playing ten minutes more and dealing with petty, unforseable injuries puts up similar production over 36.
dpnim
Sophomore
Posts: 203
And1: 79
Joined: May 03, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
 

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1368 » by dpnim » Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:38 am

Jon1798 wrote:Just for kicks:

Anthony Davis(19 years old)
20th in the league in PER
4th amongst PF's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
16.2 PPG
9.8 rebounds
2.4 blocks
1.4 steals
1.7 TO's
51.9% FG

Damian Lillard(22 years old)
90th in the league in PER
22nd amongst PG's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
17.1 PPG
6.2 assists
.9 steals
2.8 TO's
42% FG

Andre Drummond(19 years old)
11th in the league in PER
2nd amongst C's in PER
Per 36 minutes:
13.6 PPG
13.3 rebounds
2.9 blocks
1.6 steals
1.5 TO's
60.7% FG


Discuss......


Shouldn't compare guard metrics to big man metrics. PER is not an end all be all metric. The league is short on quality big men and the abundant in quality PGs. Also, dont underestimate the value of assists, Damian get's 6.6/game that's at the very least 13.2 additional points he creates for his team when on the court. Assuming they are 2pt shots. And can be argued that he is responsible for 31.5 of the teams pts every game (18.3+13.2). Which with the team averaging 97pts/game is atleast about 32.5% of the total points. That's not counting the plays PG's "assisted" on where the receiving player is immediately fouled and goes to the line (those points don't give assists to the PG) or in case of an "And 1".
Being a Blazer fan isn't exactly healthy.
User avatar
Jon1798
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,741
And1: 180
Joined: Feb 15, 2005

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1369 » by Jon1798 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:09 am

Look, I would hope that anyone that can get all the way to a basketball message board would understand why per 36 is used. Hopefully we can discuss the comparisons this time.

To above, absolutely per is not the end all metrix. I just find it to be the best attempt at assigning a number and ranking to something that can never completely be compared. As is any stat, it is what it is and nothing more.

I think the main thing this shows is that these three are fantastic players. I think Davis suffers from much higher expectations than anyone else. I find some of the things Drummond is doing is almost unprecedented. I am also a little surprised at Lillard's assist numbers. For the time he's on the court, with that supporting cast, he should not have those sort of assist numbers. He's a better player than that and I think he'll prove it.
Image
Mikez1919
Senior
Posts: 675
And1: 54
Joined: Sep 20, 2010
Location: Texas

Re: The OFFICIAL Rookie impressions thread pt. II 

Post#1370 » by Mikez1919 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:18 am

Drummond with 11/11/2 blocks in 24min. This is no longer surprising.

Return to The General Board