yardbarker

Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Moderators: Senor Chang, Morten Jensen, moocow007, Blame Rasho, LittleOzzy, Gremz, Yuri Vaultin, UGA Hayes, HMFFL, Flash3, Basti, NO-KG-AI, KingCuban, magnumt, Rhettmatic, tsherkin

Who is in a tougher situation in the future?

Celtics
69
54%
Lakers
58
46%
 
Total votes : 127

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby 83SixersRocked on Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:28 am

I'm saying Celtics, just because LA's cap is cleared in 2014. I think they'll still have one active contract, though I don't recall who.
83SixersRocked
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4757
And1: 13
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Denver

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby The Infamous1 on Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:33 am

People really haven't paid attention to the NBA in the last 50 years if they don't know the answer to this question
It will always be easier to find role players to cover up your stars defensive deficiencies than it will be to find guys that can cover up your stars offensive shortcomings.
The Infamous1
Analyst
 
Posts: 3061
And1: 21
Joined: Mar 14, 2012

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby The Boot Room on Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:34 am

tiderulz wrote:Im not sure "trade pieces" means what you think it means. No one is breaking down the door for Duhon, Hill, Blake, Jamison, Artest or Gasol. Howard is a FA and no one is going to pay Kobe's $30mil next year.

future is more than just next season.
The Boot Room
Sophomore
 
Posts: 146
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 23, 2012

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby deNIEd on Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:38 am

Depends if the 29 other front offices/GM's want to blow the Lakers, get butt f***ed by the Lakers, and then pay the Lakers for the privilege of getting abused or not.
deNIEd
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4942
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 17, 2006

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby The_Ghost_of_JB on Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:42 am

Celtics no question. Ainge signed many of these guys (Terry, Green, Bass and Lee) for at least the next three years and truth be told they are not working out all that well. It is also very tough to get guys to play in Boston.

On the other hand people love playing in LA. Plus the Lakers have the luxary to call up any GM in the NBA, hand pick any player they want and have the the opposing GM bend over backwards to ensure the Lakers give up as little as possible to get the player the want.
17 and counting.
User avatar
The_Ghost_of_JB
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4621
And1: 89
Joined: Mar 4, 2010
Location: The infamous Joe Biscuit

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby deNIEd on Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:54 am

If we assume Dwight resigns with the Laker's this offseason, Dwight's new contract will be $109 mil/5 years.

Thus, in the summer of 2014, the Lakers will have approximately $30.7 million tied up between Dwight Howard and Steve Nash.

Leaving $29.3 million left for 10 players. If you assume 8 of those players will be minimum salaried players, Lakers would have $25.3 million to split between two players.

What players would be out there? (Not including RFA's, simply because their respective team will just match them, aka the Kyrie Irving's of the world).

PG: Kyle Lowry, Jameer Nelson (TO), Mario Chalmers, Kirk Hinrich, CHRIS DUHON, STEVEN BLAKE
SG: Dwyane Wade (PO), Andre Igudala, Monta Ellis
SF: Lebron James (PO), Carmelo Anthony (PO), Paul Pierce, Danny Granger, Luol Deng, Caron Butler
PF: Dirk Nowitzki, PAU GASOL, Chris Bosh (PO), Zach Randolph (PO), Kris Humphries, Andrea Bargnani (PO)
C: Kevin Garnett, Marcin Gortat, Andrew Bogut, Emeka Okafor

If you take out the guys who are optioned and only look at UFA...

PG: Kyle Lowry, Mario Chalmers, Kirk Hinrich, CHRIS DUHON, STEVEN BLAKE
SG: Andre Igudala, Monta Ellis
SF: Paul Pierce, Danny Granger, Luol Deng, Caron Butler
PF: Dirk Nowitzki, PAU GASOL, Kris Humphries
C: Kevin Garnett, Marcin Gortat, Andrew Bogut, Emeka Okafor

Pick 2, Add Dwight, Add 40 year old Nash, Add 1 MLE, Add 1 LLE, Add 6 minimum salaried players...how good is your team LA? Still not good enough to beat OKC.
deNIEd
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4942
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 17, 2006

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby nykballa2k4 on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:00 am

If Lakers can keep Dwight, they will soon have cap space to surround him with athletic people. Celtics have Rondo who needs good teammates to be successful. Also Celtics have the Melo-Knicks the Deron-Nets and the Bynum-Sixers in their division (not to count out Raps, but Demar isn't really a stud yet) Lakers have Curry-Warriors and Blake-Clippers in the division
There is no asterisk on ANY N.B.A. titles.

Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
User avatar
nykballa2k4
RealGM
 
Posts: 13286
And1: 67
Joined: Jul 25, 2004
Location: There are good players and there are bad players... Then...there's the other guys

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby Roddy on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:13 am

Celtics.

Everybody knows that Lakers will always find a way to reaload. Next move is MWP and Hill for Kevin Love...or maybe Chris Duhon and a 2nd round pick 2018 for Josh Smith.

Btw, I will never understand why people think that Rondo is a cancer in the locker room. Everybody loves him in the team and FO.

http://www.csnne.com/basketball-boston-celtics/celtics-talk/An-inside-look-at-Rondo-To-play-with-him?blockID=807953
User avatar
Roddy
Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1315
And1: 19
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby rickrolled on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:26 am

Hopefully the Lakers, if Dwight bolts,they're screwed, no Stern in a couple years to pamper them anymore.

Free agents will want to go to the Clippers if they choose LA.
Image
User avatar
rickrolled
Rookie
 
Posts: 1026
And1: 26
Joined: Nov 12, 2011

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby Optms on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:31 am

The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:Celtics no question. Ainge signed many of these guys (Terry, Green, Bass and Lee) for at least the next three years and truth be told they are not working out all that well. It is also very tough to get guys to play in Boston.

On the other hand people love playing in LA. Plus the Lakers have the luxary to call up any GM in the NBA, hand pick any player they want and have the the opposing GM bend over backwards to ensure the Lakers give up as little as possible to get the player the want.


You make it sound as if half the GM's in the league aren't mediocre. Don't hold it against the Buss fam or Mitch that other GM's and franchises suck at dealing.
User avatar
Optms
General Manager
 
Posts: 8776
And1: 62
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby jc23 on Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:54 pm

Celtics, because this is the lakers league and getting superstars players is the norm for them.
“Showing off is the fool's idea of glory.” - Bruce Lee
User avatar
jc23
General Manager
 
Posts: 9676
And1: 100
Joined: May 30, 2010
Location: 1901 W.Madsion St

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby BubbaTee on Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:05 pm

The Lakers, if someone takes Fredo Buss out fishing. If not, that moron has the ability and the authority to single-handedly cripple the franchise going forward.

If Kupchak were running basketball operations in LA, the answer would be the Lakers, easily.
BubbaTee
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5732
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 10, 2008

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby JellosJigglin on Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:08 pm

rickrolled wrote:Hopefully the Lakers, if Dwight bolts,they're screwed, no Stern in a couple years to pamper them anymore.

Free agents will want to go to the Clippers if they choose LA.


If Stern wanted to pamper the Lakers then they'd be rollin with a lineup of Kobe, Dwight and CP3 right now. Take off the tin foil hat.
:evil: THEY WILL PAY FOR THEIR BASKETBALL REASONS :evil:
User avatar
JellosJigglin
General Manager
 
Posts: 8387
And1: 24
Joined: Jul 14, 2004

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby Curmudgeon on Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:09 pm

nykballa2k4 wrote:If Lakers can keep Dwight, they will soon have cap space to surround him with athletic people. Celtics have Rondo who needs good teammates to be successful.


And Dwight Howard doesn't need good teammates to be successful? Hell, he can't even keep Raymond Felton away from the rim defesnively and he can't score with any consistency.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
Curmudgeon
RealGM
 
Posts: 16692
And1: 18
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby r3demption on Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:13 pm

celticsare in a tougher situation the lakers get gifted everything
r3demption
Pro Prospect
 
Posts: 856
And1: 10
Joined: May 22, 2011

PreviousNext

Return to General NBA Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ADoaN17, AgentDRL, Bill Bradley, BJGOAT3, charlesdarkley, dballislife, Gargantua, Gnarc90, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], KingCuban, MellowRose, Nate505, pipfan, Probst, RoBo02, swollcat, Twizman