yardbarker

Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Moderators: Senor Chang, Morten Jensen, moocow007, Blame Rasho, KingCuban, magnumt, Rhettmatic, tsherkin, LittleOzzy, Yuri Vaultin, Gremz, UGA Hayes, HMFFL, Flash3, Basti, NO-KG-AI

Who is in a tougher situation in the future?

Celtics
69
54%
Lakers
58
46%
 
Total votes : 127

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby deNIEd on Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:40 pm

JellosJigglin wrote:
rickrolled wrote:Hopefully the Lakers, if Dwight bolts,they're screwed, no Stern in a couple years to pamper them anymore.

Free agents will want to go to the Clippers if they choose LA.


If Stern wanted to pamper the Lakers then they'd be rollin with a lineup of Kobe, Dwight and CP3 right now. Take off the tin foil hat.



Good point. I'm tired of everyone saying the Laker's are pampered. Let's make sure they never get that notion in their head again and just pamper the Clippers instead. Let the Laker's turn into this decade's Clippers.
deNIEd
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4942
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 17, 2006

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby Celts17Pride on Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:18 pm

I say it's close because people will want to play with Doc Rivers and Rondo. Players playing with Rondo know their scoring average will go up because Rondo will give them the ball.

I agree the Lakers will always be good because of their history and everyone wants to play in LA. The one thing that is going to hurt the Lakers going forward is that they won't be able to have a team payroll of $100-$110 million+ like they have in the past. The new CBA really hurts high spending teams.

I think the Celtics will have it tougher than the Lakers but it's closer than people think.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
 
Posts: 11618
And1: 87
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby ComboGuardCity on Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:22 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:I say it's close because people will want to play with Doc Rivers and Rondo. Players playing with Rondo know their scoring average will go up because Rondo will give them the ball.

I agree the Lakers will always be good because of their history and everyone wants to play in LA. The one thing that is going to hurt the Lakers going forward is that they won't be able to have a team payroll of $100-$110 million+ like they have in the past. The new CBA really hurts high spending teams.

I think the Celtics will have it tougher than the Lakers but it's closer than people think.

No one wants to play with Rondo. He's a diva.
User avatar
ComboGuardCity
RealGM
 
Posts: 15675
And1: 90
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
Location: I bet against Kemba Walker and lost

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby RutgersBJJ on Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:28 pm

Where are these tradeable assets on the Lakers?

I see Nash and I see Dwight.

No one's trading for the right to pay someone around 30 mil a season to score and do nothing else. And no one is trading the right to pay a sissy 20 million a season.

Lakers are in much worse trouble. Celtics still have Rondo, and he makes everyone around him better. Unlike Dwight, and unlike Kobe. The only thing that really screwed the Celtics up was that idiotic Jeff Green deal. They will never be players for big-time FA's, but they couldn't they have been in the Mayo sweepstakes this summer if they didn't re-sign Green?

A Rondo/Bradley/Mayo guard rotation is a pretty solid building block for the future. Plus Celtics also have young prospects like Sullinger and Melo. Lakers have....? Lakers also traded away future picks, Celtics have picks.

Future of the Lakers is built entirely on recruiting new stars, and no new stars are coming until 2015 at the earliest with Kobe's contract crippling the flexibility of the Lakers.
RIP Jared Jeffries. Gone but never forgotten...2006-2012
User avatar
RutgersBJJ
General Manager
 
Posts: 8463
And1: 20
Joined: Oct 4, 2008

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby MountBiyombo on Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:28 pm

Yeah, I think the number of free agents rushing to Boston will plummet once Paul and Kevin are retired.

But it all depends on whether or not Dwight resigns. If he does LA is in better shape. If not Rhondo is still a great pointguard. Boston would be better off.
MountBiyombo
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1899
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 8, 2011

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby High 5 on Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:41 pm

Unless the Lakers have a huge turnaround, I don't see either team being a legit competitor in the foreseeable future. LA does have the slight advantage, though. Simply because it's LA.
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
 
Posts: 12643
And1: 22
Joined: Apr 20, 2006

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby BasedJohnson on Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:45 pm

It depends if Howard stays or leaves. If he stays than I'd say Celts, if he leaves its the Lakers
Image
User avatar
BasedJohnson
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4454
And1: 29
Joined: Jan 19, 2012
Location: San Diego

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby BubbaTee on Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:07 pm

ComboGuardCity wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:I say it's close because people will want to play with Doc Rivers and Rondo. Players playing with Rondo know their scoring average will go up because Rondo will give them the ball.

I agree the Lakers will always be good because of their history and everyone wants to play in LA. The one thing that is going to hurt the Lakers going forward is that they won't be able to have a team payroll of $100-$110 million+ like they have in the past. The new CBA really hurts high spending teams.

I think the Celtics will have it tougher than the Lakers but it's closer than people think.

No one wants to play with Rondo. He's a diva.


Dwight's a diva too, pretty even there.
BubbaTee
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5640
And1: 102
Joined: Mar 10, 2008

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby LKTD on Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:41 pm

I would have to go with Boston too. The media spun the Rondo / Allen conflict and Boston is signing old players to stay in a sputtering contender mode. They have no players willing to create the next culture in TD Garden besides Rondo.
User avatar
LKTD
Senior
 
Posts: 585
And1: 6
Joined: Apr 29, 2010

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby R9ndo on Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:58 pm

Rondo
Bradley
Green
Sullinger
Maybe melo

That's a good young core.

Ainge has to contend/rebuild at the same time and he is doing a great job IMO.
R9ndo
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1979
And1: 13
Joined: May 18, 2010

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby irie on Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:19 pm

Sn0wman wrote:Celtics. Lakers can easily reload

Agreed. Celtics have free agency difficulties
User avatar
irie
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6158
And1: 51
Joined: Oct 18, 2009
Location: Kingston, Jamaica

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby irie on Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:21 pm

LKTD wrote:I would have to go with Boston too. The media spun the Rondo / Allen conflict and Boston is signing old players to stay in a sputtering contender mode. They have no players willing to create the next culture in TD Garden besides Rondo.

Didn't you already say you thought Boston when you started the thread?
User avatar
irie
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6158
And1: 51
Joined: Oct 18, 2009
Location: Kingston, Jamaica

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby ndnow on Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:53 pm

StojkoVrankovic wrote:
LKTD wrote:After this year, if you had to predict with what you know now:

Celtics will have to rebuild very soon, can players stand Rondo enough to not cause drama inside the locker room? I don't think the franchise is as appealing to free agents as the Lakers because of Rondo.

Lakers are loaded with trade pieces but do they have the personnel and mentality to stay as contenders in the Kobe era?

I think Celtics are in a tougher situation.

The ONLY player who has had an issue with Rondo was Ray Allen. Every other player loves the kid, every coach loves his abilities.

Players around the league love watching the kid play ball because they know how difficult it is to do what he does.

Stop making stuff up


Saying everyone loves him is just as bad as saying everyone hates him. You know just as much as the OP, you need to also stop making things up.
Image
User avatar
ndnow
Veteran
 
Posts: 2930
And1: 22
Joined: Feb 13, 2006

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby TheToothFairy on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:39 pm

Many Free Gaents will want to play in LA, I don't see that as a problem
User avatar
TheToothFairy
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4944
And1: 56
Joined: Jun 27, 2011
Location: Under Your Pillow

Re: Tougher Future Situation: Celtics or Lakers?

Postby YiJiLi on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:44 pm

Celtics. Although we've been saying this for years, this may be our last year of contention, and with all of our older guys, along with younger guys with larger contracts signed for another 3+ years, if KG Truth and Jet start significantly declining without any significant increase in the play of Rondo, Lee, Green, Sully, Melo, and draft picks, we could be stuck for 1-3 years.
Image
User avatar
YiJiLi
Veteran
 
Posts: 2566
And1: 82
Joined: May 23, 2012
Location: 1/2 Ghanaian 1/2 Vincentian living in Philly

PreviousNext

Return to General NBA Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: almatic, avon barksdale, BackseatBoss, BeazTreez, Bizzy_Bee, BizzyPHX, Browns16, Bskey, BW32, C0bR, DarkAzcura, db lunatic, Dez, DoubleLintendre, Fatty, Floppeur89, Gary Cokeman, hsgm, huskerdu, Hyaena, Im Coming Home, Jo Jo English, jordan0386, Keller61, MiamiRadio, MistyMountain20, Mk0, Senchu, Teh-Monkey-Man, Theoretic, Torres, UtahJazzFan88, uzy, Wiggert