what could manu have been?

Moderators: Morten Jensen, Flash3, magnumt, Blame Rasho, tsherkin, Knickstape1214, Yuri Vaultin, NO-KG-AI

kingofcomedy
Banned User
Posts: 859
And1: 10
Joined: Aug 10, 2012

what could manu have been? 

Post#1 » by kingofcomedy » Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:52 am

What could manu have been in a different system as the feature player? For the bulk of his prime he fluctuated between starter and sixth man but as a frontline player is 25-5-5 a possibility?
User avatar
-Kees-
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,156
And1: 51
Joined: Jan 16, 2011
   

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#2 » by -Kees- » Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:58 am

Yeah, he could've been. But he was really put in the perfect spot, playing off of a HoF big man, making clutch shots, smart plays and doing a lot of things. But yeah, he could've put up numbers similar to like James Harden this year maybe, maybe a bit better. But he isn't a 1st option on a title team.
User avatar
Ito
General Manager
Posts: 7,869
And1: 8
Joined: Apr 13, 2002
Location: UPTOWN, NY

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#3 » by Ito » Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:06 am

Definitely not a 25 ppg player..
Image
User avatar
Stolen Team Fan
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,315
And1: 47
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#4 » by Stolen Team Fan » Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:15 am

-Kees- wrote:Yeah, he could've been. But he was really put in the perfect spot, playing off of a HoF big man, making clutch shots, smart plays and doing a lot of things. But yeah, he could've put up numbers similar to like James Harden this year maybe, maybe a bit better. But he isn't a 1st option on a title team.

Pretty much.
I move around so much, I've just decided to start rooting for everybody.
Except the Heat.
User avatar
Br0ken_Sp0ke
Rookie
Posts: 1,100
And1: 741
Joined: Jun 19, 2012

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#5 » by Br0ken_Sp0ke » Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:36 am

Ito wrote:Definitely not a 25 ppg player..


Of course he could. He was better at his prime than Harden is right now and Harden’s putting up 25 ppg…
baki wrote:Robinson and Olajuwon are about equal, but I'd give Robinson the edge for being far more critical to the team's success than Olajuwon was.

baki wrote:I'm not sure if Harden is really that much better than Lin.

baki wrote:I call everything as I see it and I'm always right
User avatar
justinandimcool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,767
And1: 1,096
Joined: Dec 06, 2010
 

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#6 » by justinandimcool » Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:40 am

With an organization that didn't sign players that fit him, and a coach that didn't take care of him and get on him about his constant turnovers?

He would've had 3 or 4 years of all-star numbers, and would have retired early due to injuries.
Image
peja drobnjak
Starter
Posts: 2,485
And1: 42
Joined: Dec 03, 2011

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#7 » by peja drobnjak » Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:42 am

it depends on the quality of his teammates imo. he could probably chuck his way to gil type numbers but i don't think he has it in him to dominate the ball to get more than 23/5/6 or so but he would def have superstar impact or close to it
Image Turbo Zone
User avatar
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 23,669
And1: 1,908
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#8 » by Sedale Threatt » Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:04 am

I don't see him having the durability to handle a No. 1 role. He could hardly stay healthy as it was/is.
JF5 wrote:Real fans don't cry about refs.


http://wtfismikewearing.tumblr.com/
User avatar
lukekarts
Head Coach
Posts: 7,072
And1: 289
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Location: UK
   

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#9 » by lukekarts » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:42 am

Sedale Threatt wrote:I don't see him having the durability to handle a No. 1 role. He could hardly stay healthy as it was/is.


This, pretty much. He might have a higher PPG / lower efficiency season in a different scenario, but actually the Spurs system has allowed him to maximise his talent & preserve his health.
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.

Own A Team v3 (Summer 2013) - Cleveland Rockers
Kyrie Irving / Wesley Matthews / Paul George / Chris Bosh / Omer Asik
Isaiah Thomas / Jarrett Jack / Giannis Antetokounmpo / Terrence Jones / Motiejunas
deliriousmouse
Rookie
Posts: 1,000
And1: 167
Joined: Dec 18, 2011

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#10 » by deliriousmouse » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:59 am

He could of been a 25/5/5 player

Or a 16/4/3 with 3 rings with maybe a 4th comming.

Not bad for a second round pick

I feel he would be happier with the latter.
User avatar
justinandimcool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,767
And1: 1,096
Joined: Dec 06, 2010
 

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#11 » by justinandimcool » Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:03 am

let's face it, if he's a team's best player- that team's going nowhere. Knowing and inferring Manu's personality he's a great teammate as long as he's winning. Winning first over rah rah. He would definitely diva out and request a trade to a winning team, even if it meant being 2nd or 3rd fiddle. So the parallel universes kind of intersect, lawlz.
Image
Fischella
Head Coach
Posts: 7,414
And1: 839
Joined: Feb 11, 2012
   

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#12 » by Fischella » Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:28 am

He's better as team player than in franchise mold, and he knows that, because of this he didnt left the Spurs when he could, he knew that he isnt 1st option material.

He's a great player, but there were at least 6 guys in his position way better than him last decade, Bryant, Wade, Iverson, Allen, Carter and McGrady.
User avatar
Mirjalovic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,363
And1: 888
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !
   

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#13 » by Mirjalovic » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:13 am

He has nice fundamental & real skills, also very smart bball player. If he healthy enough to play extended minutes, i believe he doesnt far away from Kobe, even sometimes in burst i think he is the best player in the game. You guys underrating him.
13/7/2015
One Love wrote:Randle has no length, limited moves, no touch, rebounds poorly & forces the ball inside. Randle is BUST


TheChosen wrote:Would put Lebron over Duncan..definitely when both careers are over. Kobe or Malone is a toss-up.
User avatar
Young_Star11
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,265
And1: 495
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: RealGM
   

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#14 » by Young_Star11 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:24 am

Similar numbers and situation to what Harden finds himself in at the moment.

Similar players too!
YFZblu
Analyst
Posts: 3,735
And1: 234
Joined: Apr 13, 2010

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#15 » by YFZblu » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:53 pm

justinandimcool wrote:He would've had 3 or 4 years of all-star numbers, and would have retired early due to injuries.


This.

Also, we would be asking ourselves: What could Manu have been on a team with talent?
User avatar
Spurtatcus
Starter
Posts: 2,350
And1: 27
Joined: Jul 22, 2009

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#16 » by Spurtatcus » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:05 pm

He was the man for Argentina when they destroyed the Olympics in 2004 including the US team. Ginobili entered the NBA when he was 26, so it's hard to say what he could've been, but as a #1 he definitely would average 25/5/5 or so but he would probably miss 20 games a season
Frankie23
Rookie
Posts: 1,221
And1: 89
Joined: Apr 27, 2010
   

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#17 » by Frankie23 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:07 pm

Manu has something that no SG has: He makes his teammates better.
Why? Cause he's the best playmaker among SG, he's unselfish and always do things to help his team win (rebounds, steals, charges, intangibles).

So maybe he's not making 25-5-5, but his team would be better..
Fischella
Head Coach
Posts: 7,414
And1: 839
Joined: Feb 11, 2012
   

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#18 » by Fischella » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:14 pm

Seriously, McGrady, Carter, Wade, Iverson,... all of them where great playmakers as SGs too.

Devin Harris was an All Star just because of Carter.
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 29,783
And1: 3,681
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#19 » by DanTown8587 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:12 pm

Completely depends on guys 2-12, but his teams could have been top 3-4 seeds in their confremce and competing for conference championships.

Better cast as a #2 or #3 option of course, but definitely for a time was a top 20 player in the league. He's this generation's McHale or Worthy: successful because they had an all-time great ahead of them but still incredibly talented players.
User avatar
I_Socrates
General Manager
Posts: 7,691
And1: 829
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
       

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#20 » by I_Socrates » Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:16 pm

Fischella wrote:Seriously, McGrady, Carter, Wade, Iverson,... all of them where great playmakers as SGs too.

Devin Harris was an All Star just because of Carter.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I think I died a little. Manu could have been a great first option, put up big numbers, but what he chose was much greater than what he 'could have' been. His legacy now is greater than what it would be under those circumstances. He is currently the only player to have medals/championships in 4+ competitive leagues and possibly the most clutch 6th man the NBA has ever seen.

Return to The General Board


cron