what could manu have been?

Moderators: Morten Jensen, Blame Rasho, tsherkin, Doctor MJ, Flash3, UGA Hayes, Yuri Vaultin, Mark K, NO-KG-AI, magnumt

User avatar
Spurtatcus
Starter
Posts: 2,350
And1: 27
Joined: Jul 22, 2009

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#16 » by Spurtatcus » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:05 pm

He was the man for Argentina when they destroyed the Olympics in 2004 including the US team. Ginobili entered the NBA when he was 26, so it's hard to say what he could've been, but as a #1 he definitely would average 25/5/5 or so but he would probably miss 20 games a season
Frankie23
Rookie
Posts: 1,156
And1: 81
Joined: Apr 27, 2010

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#17 » by Frankie23 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:07 pm

Manu has something that no SG has: He makes his teammates better.
Why? Cause he's the best playmaker among SG, he's unselfish and always do things to help his team win (rebounds, steals, charges, intangibles).

So maybe he's not making 25-5-5, but his team would be better..
Fischella
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 638
Joined: Feb 11, 2012
         

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#18 » by Fischella » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:14 pm

Seriously, McGrady, Carter, Wade, Iverson,... all of them where great playmakers as SGs too.

Devin Harris was an All Star just because of Carter.
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 28,392
And1: 2,856
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#19 » by DanTown8587 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:12 pm

Completely depends on guys 2-12, but his teams could have been top 3-4 seeds in their confremce and competing for conference championships.

Better cast as a #2 or #3 option of course, but definitely for a time was a top 20 player in the league. He's this generation's McHale or Worthy: successful because they had an all-time great ahead of them but still incredibly talented players.
The 2015 Chicago Bulls live and die with Derrick Rose's production and health.
User avatar
I_Socrates
General Manager
Posts: 7,565
And1: 804
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
       

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#20 » by I_Socrates » Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:16 pm

Fischella wrote:Seriously, McGrady, Carter, Wade, Iverson,... all of them where great playmakers as SGs too.

Devin Harris was an All Star just because of Carter.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I think I died a little. Manu could have been a great first option, put up big numbers, but what he chose was much greater than what he 'could have' been. His legacy now is greater than what it would be under those circumstances. He is currently the only player to have medals/championships in 4+ competitive leagues and possibly the most clutch 6th man the NBA has ever seen.
KyletheDingbat
Starter
Posts: 2,294
And1: 1,094
Joined: Jun 15, 2010

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#21 » by KyletheDingbat » Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:34 pm

There were legitimate talks about Manu being nearly as good as Kobe, just with less minutes, circa 2005. He used to be unstoppable. I'd put him at about the same production as Paul Pierce - another player that could sometimes be the best in the league.
User avatar
Ito
General Manager
Posts: 7,865
And1: 7
Joined: Apr 13, 2002
Location: UPTOWN, NY

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#22 » by Ito » Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:57 pm

Whoa.. Manu is really loved in here.. Ima use that word so I wont say Overrated Lol

Manu was a product of Pop, Parker and Duncan... no way Manu has the skillset to carry a team.. a team with him as the best player wouldnt even make the playoffs... He was put in the perfect situation and made the best of it and now people think he could have been better if he was the man.. Man, stop overrating these players!!
Image
kingofcomedy
Banned User
Posts: 859
And1: 10
Joined: Aug 10, 2012

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#23 » by kingofcomedy » Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:54 pm

Ito wrote:Whoa.. Manu is really loved in here.. Ima use that word so I wont say Overrated Lol

Manu was a product of Pop, Parker and Duncan... no way Manu has the skillset to carry a team.. a team with him as the best player wouldnt even make the playoffs... He was put in the perfect situation and made the best of it and now people think he could have been better if he was the man.. Man, stop overrating these players!!

So who was he a product of on the Argentina team
User avatar
BizGilwalker
RealGM
Posts: 26,695
And1: 3,247
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
Location: #biznation
     

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#24 » by BizGilwalker » Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:51 am

Mirjalovic wrote:He has nice fundamental & real skills, also very smart bball player. If he healthy enough to play extended minutes, i believe he doesnt far away from Kobe, even sometimes in burst i think he is the best player in the game. You guys underrating him.
So Manu jumps from top 60-70 all-time to top 15-20 all-time? :lol:
fatlever wrote:Lamb Gang logic - Kemba Walker is faking his injury as his way of a silent protest against not trading for Lamb. You guys are officially off the rails.
:lol:
User avatar
I_Socrates
General Manager
Posts: 7,565
And1: 804
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
       

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#25 » by I_Socrates » Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:13 am

CHA_77_Bobcats wrote:
Mirjalovic wrote:He has nice fundamental & real skills, also very smart bball player. If he healthy enough to play extended minutes, i believe he doesnt far away from Kobe, even sometimes in burst i think he is the best player in the game. You guys underrating him.
So Manu jumps from top 60-70 all-time to top 15-20 all-time? :lol:


I wouldn't go that far, but he could definitely have been a top 50 if he went the route the OP suggests. However, I think he's more than happy as it is. He's bound to be in the HOF after he retires, no other player has accomplished as much in basketball, NBA and international combined, than Manu Ginobili. Obviously he never got the MVP's, although its arguable he could have gotten a Finals MVP at least once simply due to his clutch heroics.
User avatar
ndnow
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,993
And1: 612
Joined: Feb 13, 2006
     

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#26 » by ndnow » Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:18 am

-Kees- wrote:But he isn't a 1st option on a title team.


That's the key right there. There are a lot of players in this league if you put them on a crappy team give them the green light that can score 25ppg.
sisibilio
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,462
And1: 342
Joined: Nov 18, 2009

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#27 » by sisibilio » Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:51 am

DanTown8587 wrote:Completely depends on guys 2-12, but his teams could have been top 3-4 seeds in their confremce and competing for conference championships.

I don't think so. With a great 2nd-3rd option, good and cohesive supporting cast and coaching staff he could lead his team to the playoffs, but as a low seed and maybe if they're lucky and get a good match up make it to the second round but that would be it. Basically the Roy-led Blazers without Oden.
If you want to try to measure the elements of basketball that are supposedly unmeasurable, spend a game just watching Marc Gasol.
@MikePradaSBN
User avatar
Hawaii
Pro Prospect
Posts: 936
And1: 21
Joined: Apr 30, 2007
         

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#28 » by Hawaii » Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:11 am

Manu's had a great career, not really worthy of a "what could have been" situation. He's been an international superstar, and a multiple-ring-winning important piece of his team. Easily a HOF'er.
HelloBrooklyn
Rookie
Posts: 1,070
And1: 66
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
 

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#29 » by HelloBrooklyn » Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:58 pm

Manu would've have been exposed if he was a main building block of a team. The guy is a great player for the role he is given in However, I just don't think he has enough talent to put a team on his back to have a winning culture.
Image
TheToothFairy
Banned User
Posts: 6,120
And1: 292
Joined: Jun 27, 2011
Location: Under Your Pillow

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#30 » by TheToothFairy » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:14 pm

Phoenix would have been great for his. Run and gun and good medical care
User avatar
Woodsanity
General Manager
Posts: 7,588
And1: 1,136
Joined: Mar 30, 2012
 

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#31 » by Woodsanity » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:33 pm

The problem with Manu is his durability. He would have a few elite seasons thats it. He does not have the durability to be a starter for several seasons.
TheToothFairy wrote:Phoenix would have been great for his. Run and gun and good medical care

True. He could probably help Nash win a ring or two.
twix2500 wrote:If Lebron went to NY and Melo to Miami, Melo would have a trophy and Lebron would not.

Tiesto_Lakers wrote:The more I watch basketball, the more I realize that Kobe, in his absolute prime (2006-2008), was a top 2 player of all-time, only second to Jordan.
User avatar
mixerball
Senior
Posts: 740
And1: 293
Joined: May 08, 2010

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#32 » by mixerball » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:27 pm

Ito wrote:Whoa.. Manu is really loved in here.. Ima use that word so I wont say Overrated Lol

Manu was a product of Pop, Parker and Duncan... no way Manu has the skillset to carry a team.. a team with him as the best player wouldnt even make the playoffs... He was put in the perfect situation and made the best of it and now people think he could have been better if he was the man.. Man, stop overrating these players!!

he won everything there is to win wherever he was playing

and did that with team on his shoulder
he shouldered the spurs too when they needed him

and for manu (and european me) these numbers (25-5-5) mean nothing
its the TEAM play,team success and championships that its all about
and manu decortated himself quite nicely over the years

he was the first option everywhere except the spurs

you cant use overrated and manu in the same sentence
AmazingJason
Head Coach
Posts: 6,237
And1: 1,493
Joined: Aug 07, 2006
Location: NYC
   

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#33 » by AmazingJason » Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:36 pm

Manu's going to be a HOFer, so all this talk is moot :)
Image
Frankie23
Rookie
Posts: 1,156
And1: 81
Joined: Apr 27, 2010

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#34 » by Frankie23 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:14 pm

Some important facts:
About duration: Manu played his best seasons stat wise when he rested in the summer. Also, he came to the NBA at 25/26 years old..
About stats: Spurs has always been a deep team, so no one had BIG stats (ala Kevin Love) since 2003.
About being 2nd/3rd option: everybody knows Timmy was the guy, but Manu always had the ball in his hands in the last minutes of games, so that makes his an unusual 2nd/3rd option, right?
Stat Padder
Junior
Posts: 269
And1: 7
Joined: Mar 29, 2012
Location: Lagos

Re: what could manu have been? 

Post#35 » by Stat Padder » Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:19 pm

Manu as the Man would have averaged 25/4.5/5 on 46 % shooting
I aplogise for my poor english as I a from nigeria :)

Return to The General Board