Best team without their best player?

Moderators: Morten Jensen, Blame Rasho, tsherkin, Doctor MJ, Flash3, UGA Hayes, Yuri Vaultin, Mark K, NO-KG-AI, magnumt

Which team would be the strongest without their best player?

New York Knicks
26
20%
Los Angeles Lakers
9
7%
San Antonio Spurs
42
33%
Miami Heat
15
12%
Chicago Bulls
24
19%
Other
13
10%
 
Total votes: 129

User avatar
shawngoat23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,533
And1: 136
Joined: Apr 17, 2008

Best team without their best player? 

Post#1 » by shawngoat23 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:25 am

Which team do you think would be strongest if their best player missed extended time?
penbeast0 wrote:Yes, he did. And as a mod, I can't even put him on ignore . . . sigh.
User avatar
vegajf51
Sophomore
Posts: 234
And1: 32
Joined: Mar 19, 2011
Location: Sand Springs, OK
 

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#2 » by vegajf51 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:31 am

Miami heat would still make the playoffs in the east easy.
User avatar
smith2373
General Manager
Posts: 9,184
And1: 517
Joined: Mar 01, 2011
   

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#3 » by smith2373 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:35 am

The Spurs.
ImageImage ImageImage ImageImage ImageImage
User avatar
OneWhoKnocks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,917
And1: 123
Joined: Mar 19, 2012
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#4 » by OneWhoKnocks » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:01 am

The Spurs without question. Forget just their best player, even without 4 of their best players they can still win games against 2/3 of the NBA teams out there.
User avatar
vegajf51
Sophomore
Posts: 234
And1: 32
Joined: Mar 19, 2011
Location: Sand Springs, OK
 

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#5 » by vegajf51 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:06 am

The spurs without Parker would do nothing in the playoffs, Miami could still possibly win the east with wade+bosh, probably wouldn't but would have a shot. You guys forget how loaded Miami is, it's not just Lebron but he clearly is their best player. Wade+ Bosh deserve more respect.
User avatar
Sinant
Head Coach
Posts: 7,135
And1: 129
Joined: Aug 24, 2010

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#6 » by Sinant » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:07 am

Interesting that the Thunder aren't there.

I mean, I think they'd be a lot worse than people think they would because just Westbrook is probably going to be pretty bad offensively, but he's still a Top 10 player.

With that said, the Spurs.
User avatar
Axel
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,549
And1: 133
Joined: Jul 14, 2007
Location: Raleigh

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#7 » by Axel » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:09 am

I think the Spurs would have the least decline in their overall level of performance, while the Heat would still be the better team. I think OKC would withstand the loss of its best player more than any of the teams listed. I think they would be the best team in the NBA, if every team lost its best player.
Image
User avatar
vegajf51
Sophomore
Posts: 234
And1: 32
Joined: Mar 19, 2011
Location: Sand Springs, OK
 

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#8 » by vegajf51 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:12 am

Axel wrote:I think the Spurs would have the least decline in their overall level of performance, while the Heat would still be the better team. I think OKC would withstand the loss of its best player more than any of the teams listed. I think they would be the best team in the NBA, if every team lost its best player.

Without durant Westbrook would need to average 40, lol! I love Westbrook but we wouldn't be that good. We would still be a great defensive team but would struggle to score.

And I agree with spurs least decline, but the question was the better team.
OptimusOne6
Junior
Posts: 477
And1: 23
Joined: Nov 20, 2011
Location: Chicago

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#9 » by OptimusOne6 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:13 am

If people think Tony Parker is the Spurs best player then I would agree, but if they think its Tim then I would disagree.

Some players are more valuable than others but that doesn't necessarily mean they are better. It is mainly because the Spurs don't have much depth up front while they have a lot of depth in the back-court.
User avatar
Ronito
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,921
And1: 101
Joined: Feb 14, 2011

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#10 » by Ronito » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:13 am

Chicago.
Image
KingAmmar
Banned User
Posts: 443
And1: 12
Joined: Apr 09, 2008

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#11 » by KingAmmar » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:13 am

Raptors play Better without their supposed best player (Bargnani).
Howcome they are not an option!!!11ONE
User avatar
Ganji
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,950
And1: 205
Joined: Nov 08, 2008
     

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#12 » by Ganji » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:24 am

Spurs, you can't fight the system.
Image
User avatar
Axel
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,549
And1: 133
Joined: Jul 14, 2007
Location: Raleigh

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#13 » by Axel » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:34 am

vegajf51 wrote:
Axel wrote:I think the Spurs would have the least decline in their overall level of performance, while the Heat would still be the better team. I think OKC would withstand the loss of its best player more than any of the teams listed. I think they would be the best team in the NBA, if every team lost its best player.

Without durant Westbrook would need to average 40, lol! I love Westbrook but we wouldn't be that good. We would still be a great defensive team but would struggle to score.

And I agree with spurs least decline, but the question was the better team.


Really though? Westbrook is the Thunder's best creator, I think they would be OK on the offensive end. I would expect him to thrive in a system that made him the primary scorer offensively, and still create for the rest of his team. OKC without KD could beat MIA without LBJ, I think.

But I did answer who was the better team. Out of the choices listed, its clearly Miami.
Image
mirrornick
Banned User
Posts: 12,008
And1: 5,103
Joined: Jul 08, 2009
Location: Markham
 

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#14 » by mirrornick » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:39 am

KingAmmar wrote:Raptors play Better without their supposed best player (Bargnani).
Howcome they are not an option!!!11ONE


this
EscapoTHB
Suspended
Posts: 6,808
And1: 890
Joined: Nov 26, 2011

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#15 » by EscapoTHB » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:50 am

The knicks don't seem to miss a beat when melo is out.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
User avatar
orangeparka
Head Coach
Posts: 6,577
And1: 181
Joined: Apr 23, 2010

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#16 » by orangeparka » Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:13 am

OKC, especially if they can get another rotation wing.

Have Kmart fill in KD's off-ball role and give RW the remaining shots, and I don't think they'd too as much worse off as any other team, by far.
Image
User avatar
22haytham22
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,602
And1: 5,880
Joined: Apr 19, 2011
       

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#17 » by 22haytham22 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:44 am

Raptors play better without bargnani hahahaha
Image

TreadMilling Since 1995

Darain wrote:Dude is like 6-10, 6-12 at the most
But he is definitely not 7 foot
User avatar
HEAT33
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,356
And1: 109
Joined: Sep 29, 2010

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#18 » by HEAT33 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:54 am

The Heat.
Wade would step into Lebrons role of being the main go to player.

2 offensive weapons with Wade (healthy) and Bosh is what most teams would dream about.

Then you have Ray Allen also being an offensive threat. Wade could play SF in certain matchups playing small ball and have Ray Ray at SG.

Small Ball
PG: Chalmers
SG: Ray Allen
SF: Dwayne Wade
PF: Battier/Haslem
C Bosh
EscapoTHB wrote:I think the 92 dream team would get beat by a lot of the top international teams today.

:lol:
nikomCH
Rookie
Posts: 1,176
And1: 166
Joined: Dec 25, 2008

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#19 » by nikomCH » Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:19 am

Spurs, Knicks, Thunder I think would all do fine without their best player.

The Lakers would be a wreck without Kobe (as the roster stands right now) and the Heat would be pretty bad without LeBron imo especially with Wade not playing well.
User avatar
oaklandwarriors
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,053
And1: 601
Joined: May 30, 2011
   

Re: Best team without their best player? 

Post#20 » by oaklandwarriors » Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:20 am

If Bogut is the Warriors best player, it's the Warriors.

Return to The General Board