Moderators: Senor Chang, Morten Jensen, moocow007, Blame Rasho, NO-KG-AI, KingCuban, magnumt, Rhettmatic, tsherkin, LittleOzzy, Yuri Vaultin, Gremz, UGA Hayes, HMFFL, Flash3, Basti
by DaeDae on Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:18 am
TwentyOne920 wrote:Of course, some 4 year college players don't become stars, but for every Derrick Rose there's a Tim Duncan as far as player development goes.
Really? Show me all the 4 year college players in the last 20 years that are on the same level with the following:
Kobe
Tmac
Lebron
Carmelo
Derrick Rose
Durant
Dwight Howard
KG
Kyrie
Kevin Love
Eric Gordon
Even Granger, Deng, et al. are above the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of 4 year guys.
That doesn't even count the "2 and done" guys like Shaq, CP3, Black Griffin, Westbrook etc
Outside of Wade, Roy and Duncan, all exceptions to the four year rule (Was Roy a 4 year player?), your argument fails terribly. There ARE exceptions of course. One and done'rs fail. And certainly there are a (very small) number of 4 year guys that break out. But the general rule of the NBA is, and HAS BEEN for the last 20 years, that if you are good enough to go, you go as early as you can. 4 year college players become 4 year college players BECAUSE largely in years 1,2, and 3, they aren't seen as super high upside NBA players. Period.
Again, this isn't a commentary on Lillard specifically, but moreso on the lazy analysis tht is being used to categorize him as this or that.
Derrick Rose could have avoided all the drama with his front office:
a) By accepting a shorter deal with
b) An opt out clause.
He didn't do that.
-
DaeDae
- Sixth Man
-
- Posts: 1603
- And1: 7
- Joined: Mar 11, 2010
by orangeparka on Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:24 am
I like the Billups comparison for him.
-

orangeparka
- Lead Assistant
-
- Posts: 5823
- And1: 32
- Joined: Apr 23, 2010
by spacemonkey on Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:02 am
nuposse04 wrote:Arenas with better shot selection, possibly a better distributor as well.
That's like the anti-Arenas (???)
-

spacemonkey
- Sixth Man
-
- Posts: 1586
- And1: 4
- Joined: Nov 24, 2004
-
by Kobe Bean on Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:22 am
Poor man's Norris "Big 4" Cole
I mean he's like 22 years old. That's ancient. Even fossil KG has more of an upside. Dude has no lift or body control either
-

Kobe Bean
- Pro Prospect
-
- Posts: 832
- And1: 13
- Joined: Sep 24, 2012
by Jack wore plaid on Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:04 am
BeasleyTheBeast wrote:21/7/4 is the highest I see, Tim Hardaway at best
So the "highest" you can see from Lillard is his scoring going up 2.7 ppg, his assist totals going up .4 asp, and his rebounds going up .5 rpg from his rookie season?
-

Jack wore plaid
- Sixth Man
-
- Posts: 1746
- And1: 7
- Joined: Jun 1, 2007
by Yuri Vaultin on Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:42 am
princeofpalace wrote:Tony Parker
Except with amazing 3 ball range?
At this point he reminds me of a 25/26 year old Jason Terry. The kid will only get better. I'm pretty sure those writing him off are the same posters that thought he'd be a bust. These posters will continue to be wrong.
Props to Schadenfruede for the sig.
-

Yuri Vaultin
- Forum Mod
-
- Posts: 10695
- And1: 70
- Joined: Jun 23, 2006
- Location: In a tree by your window.
by Senor Chang on Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:14 am
Wizenheimer wrote:just for reference, pre-draft comparisons between Rose and Lillard:
Height w/o Shoes: Rose 6' 1.5"....Lillard 6' 1.75"
Weight: Rose 196"....Lillard 189
Wingspan: Rose 6' 8"....Lillard 6' 7.75"
No Step Vert: Rose 34.5"....Lillard 34.5"
Max Vert: Rose 40.0"....Lillard 39.5"
Bench Press: Rose 10....Lillard 13
Lane Agility: Rose 11.69....Lillard 11.15
3/4 Court Sprint: Rose 3.05....Lillard 3.34
now, those aren't the sum and total of athletic ability but it does show that Rose and Lillard were pretty close in the gauges that NBA teams use to measure their prospects. There really wasn't a significant difference between them except Rose looked to have better vertical speed while Lillard seemed to have better agility
there may not be the gulf between them that many imagine
The sprint is huge when comparing to the two. Rose scored one of the highest of any top lotto picks since draft express began recording the combine results. Other noteworthy sprinters are Nate Robinson who recorded 2.96 and Eric Gordon who did 3.01.

-

Senor Chang
- Global Mod
-
- Posts: 23767
- And1: 46
- Joined: Jan 25, 2002
- Location: Why do you teach Spanish?
-
by Wizenheimer on Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:26 am
Senor Chang wrote:Wizenheimer wrote:just for reference, pre-draft comparisons between Rose and Lillard:
Height w/o Shoes: Rose 6' 1.5"....Lillard 6' 1.75"
Weight: Rose 196"....Lillard 189
Wingspan: Rose 6' 8"....Lillard 6' 7.75"
No Step Vert: Rose 34.5"....Lillard 34.5"
Max Vert: Rose 40.0"....Lillard 39.5"
Bench Press: Rose 10....Lillard 13
Lane Agility: Rose 11.69....Lillard 11.15
3/4 Court Sprint: Rose 3.05....Lillard 3.34
now, those aren't the sum and total of athletic ability but it does show that Rose and Lillard were pretty close in the gauges that NBA teams use to measure their prospects. There really wasn't a significant difference between them except Rose looked to have better vertical speed while Lillard seemed to have better agility
there may not be the gulf between them that many imagine
The sprint is huge when comparing to the two. Rose scored one of the highest of any top lotto picks since draft express began recording the combine results. Other noteworthy sprinters are Nate Robinson who recorded 2.96 and Eric Gordon who did 3.01.
the sprint is an important number. So is the lane agility as it factors in lateral as well as vertical speed. For PG's, the one issue with both those tests is that neither is conducted with a basketball.
-
Wizenheimer
- RealGM
-
- Posts: 21113
- And1: 73
- Joined: May 27, 2007
by Ice the knees on Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:47 am
noobcake wrote:MellowRose wrote:Does he not enough athleticism to become the next Rose?
He is not freak athletic, but being good is not all about being a freak. Rose actually has a lot of skills. Rose and Westbrook are both 70% athleticism, 30% skill point guards. Irving relies on 80% skill, 20% athleticism. He doesn't have the skill to make up his non-elite athleticism.
Lillard is really really old; he is in fact older than Irving by 2 years. His skill and body has both matured to probably 70-80% levels/
Rose is one of the most skilled players in the league...
-
Ice the knees
- Pro Prospect
-
- Posts: 916
- And1: 20
- Joined: Sep 19, 2012
by Senor Chang on Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:51 am
Wizenheimer wrote:Senor Chang wrote:Wizenheimer wrote:just for reference, pre-draft comparisons between Rose and Lillard:
Height w/o Shoes: Rose 6' 1.5"....Lillard 6' 1.75"
Weight: Rose 196"....Lillard 189
Wingspan: Rose 6' 8"....Lillard 6' 7.75"
No Step Vert: Rose 34.5"....Lillard 34.5"
Max Vert: Rose 40.0"....Lillard 39.5"
Bench Press: Rose 10....Lillard 13
Lane Agility: Rose 11.69....Lillard 11.15
3/4 Court Sprint: Rose 3.05....Lillard 3.34
now, those aren't the sum and total of athletic ability but it does show that Rose and Lillard were pretty close in the gauges that NBA teams use to measure their prospects. There really wasn't a significant difference between them except Rose looked to have better vertical speed while Lillard seemed to have better agility
there may not be the gulf between them that many imagine
The sprint is huge when comparing to the two. Rose scored one of the highest of any top lotto picks since draft express began recording the combine results. Other noteworthy sprinters are Nate Robinson who recorded 2.96 and Eric Gordon who did 3.01.
the sprint is an important number. So is the lane agility as it factors in lateral as well as vertical speed. For PG's, the one issue with both those tests is that neither is conducted with a basketball.
The point of these are to test players raw physical abilities. It is likely if you redid the sprint test with the ball Damian would go up in the rankings but that would just weed out the non ball handlers. it will not put him near the Rose, Westbrooks, Gordon's etc..

-

Senor Chang
- Global Mod
-
- Posts: 23767
- And1: 46
- Joined: Jan 25, 2002
- Location: Why do you teach Spanish?
-
by cancer on Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:55 am
i like the jet comparison
-
cancer
- Sixth Man
-
- Posts: 1795
- And1: 13
- Joined: Nov 6, 2009
by TheKingOfVa360 on Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:59 am
He can be Marbury with less assists. That's his ceiling to me. Plays like a vet, very good pace. Defense lacking but can improve.
-

TheKingOfVa360
- Head Coach
-
- Posts: 6175
- And1: 38
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Va DC Metro
by NYK_89 on Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:42 pm
Jesus people he is 22 and has a fairly polished game by comparison a player like Jrue Holiday is only a month older, those of you expecting some vast improvement really need to step back and ask why you think he will improve. I see little to no chance that he becomes a top 10 player and likley will just become a more efficient version on himself. Not that this is bad but id still easily take Davis over him 10 times out of 10 and Beal MKG and Drummond all have far higher upside.
-

NYK_89
- Analyst
-
- Posts: 3736
- And1: 36
- Joined: Mar 3, 2011
by Yuri Vaultin on Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:50 pm
NYK_89 wrote: Not that this is bad but id still easily take Davis over him 10 times out of 10 and Beal MKG and Drummond all have far higher upside.
All have a much lower basement too.
Props to Schadenfruede for the sig.
-

Yuri Vaultin
- Forum Mod
-
- Posts: 10695
- And1: 70
- Joined: Jun 23, 2006
- Location: In a tree by your window.
Return to General NBA Discussion
Users browsing this forum: ABACA, ATLHawksfan21, bigheadburton, bigpimpatl, Boneman2, bullsfan78, D.Brasco, dabestspoona, Deus, Formidable Bull, Froob, Ganji, Ive, jc23, JoeSchmo24, MeloMIracle, peZt, RapsCA, robert_84s, sabonis, SunKing, The4thHorseman, VicG, WVSArtist