yardbarker

KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Moderators: Senor Chang, Morten Jensen, moocow007, Blame Rasho, LittleOzzy, Gremz, Yuri Vaultin, UGA Hayes, HMFFL, Flash3, Basti, NO-KG-AI, KingCuban, magnumt, Rhettmatic, tsherkin

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby deNIEd on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:00 pm

Frank Mulely wrote:why didn't he have this coalition before the Seattle group appeared?

I want the Kings in Sacto but seems like this has been mishandled by whatever people with money want to keep 'em there.


Because in all of 2011 the Maloofs told KJ and everyone in Sacramento that the team is not for sale and turned down offers to keep the team in Sacramento.

Because in all of 2012 the Maloofs told KJ and everyone in Sacramento that the team is not for sale and turned down offers to keep the team in Sacramento.

Because all of a sudden the Maloofs sold the team. When the news started coming out about the Kings being sold to Hansen's group, the minority owners were not even notified of the King's dealings. Don't you think the other 35% of the owners should at least be given the courtesy of letting them know that you're thinking about selling?
deNIEd
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4942
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 17, 2006

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby DusterBuster on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:07 pm

deNIEd wrote:Because all of a sudden the Maloofs sold the team. When the news started coming out about the Kings being sold to Hansen's group, the minority owners were not even notified of the King's dealings. Don't you think the other 35% of the owners should at least be given the courtesy of letting them know that you're thinking about selling?


They're called minority owners for a reason. They can have a say and their concerns aired, but the final decision always lies with whoever the majority owners are. In this case, that's soon to be the Hansen/Balmer group.

Same way with investing in a huge corporation. You may own a couple shares of Apple, but you don't get to tell Tim Cook what he does or doesn't put into the next iPhone or where he gets to move the Apple HQ.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
 
Posts: 12329
And1: 141
Joined: Jan 31, 2010

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby DanTown8587 on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:15 pm

This thread is sad. Mainly because the NBA ownership isn't run where if KJ got a group of guys together that the league would even approve them.
Total Money Spent keeping Marco, Thomas, #20, #49, using MMLE: $99.4925 million
DanTown8587
RealGM
 
Posts: 22386
And1: 132
Joined: Jan 6, 2008
Location: Chicago

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby RIPskaterdude on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:19 pm

You guys have no idea what is even coming. He's not going to announce everyone at once, give him time. It's only been 3 days since the Maloofs put the team for sale. He isn't going to show all of his cards at once, nor would he have a press conference just to say "hey we only have $19 million, sorry guys, we tried". Give it a rest and see what happens, there's 2 months to go.
Image
Howard Mass wrote:We are friends skaterdude
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
 
Posts: 53090
And1: 2769
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: RIP xx_skaterdude_xx

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby DusterBuster on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:22 pm

DanTown8587 wrote:This thread is sad. Mainly because the NBA ownership isn't run where if KJ got a group of guys together that the league would even approve them.


Exactly. The NBA isn't some fly-by-night organization where if you get a group of guys with money together and say "OK, here's our money, give us a team!" You have to have plans in place. They still have no solid plan to fix the arena situation, they have ideas and proposals, but nothing set in stone like Seattle has. They've got all their ducks in a row and the next 5 years are all mapped out. Even if by some odd chance KJ rounded up enough people to match the Seattle offer, they still need to have a set in stone plan to get the Kings in a updated arena and make them profitable. Seattle has those plans set up, KJ simply doesn't and won't have those plans set up in time to keep them there. This type of thing takes years to plan, the Balmer/Hansen group has already put in the time to plan all that out.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
 
Posts: 12329
And1: 141
Joined: Jan 31, 2010

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby deNIEd on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:26 pm

DusterBuster wrote:
deNIEd wrote:Because all of a sudden the Maloofs sold the team. When the news started coming out about the Kings being sold to Hansen's group, the minority owners were not even notified of the King's dealings. Don't you think the other 35% of the owners should at least be given the courtesy of letting them know that you're thinking about selling?


They're called minority owners for a reason. They can have a say and their concerns aired, but the final decision always lies with whoever the majority owners are. In this case, that's soon to be the Hansen/Balmer group.

Same way with investing in a huge corporation. You may own a couple shares of Apple, but you don't get to tell Tim Cook what he does or doesn't put into the next iPhone or where he gets to move the Apple HQ.



I know they are minority owners. But they still own a large portion...and many of them have been owners far longer than the Maloofs. It's just a sign of complete and utter lack of respect.
deNIEd
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4942
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 17, 2006

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby DanTown8587 on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:29 pm

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:You guys have no idea what is even coming. He's not going to announce everyone at once, give him time. It's only been 3 days since the Maloofs put the team for sale. He isn't going to show all of his cards at once, nor would he have a press conference just to say "hey we only have $19 million, sorry guys, we tried". Give it a rest and see what happens, there's 2 months to go.


Look, I wish the Kings luck in their endeavor to keep the team. But there isn't some edict from Stern or the league that if the city gets a buyer(s) that the league is going to say that Sacramento will stay.
Total Money Spent keeping Marco, Thomas, #20, #49, using MMLE: $99.4925 million
DanTown8587
RealGM
 
Posts: 22386
And1: 132
Joined: Jan 6, 2008
Location: Chicago

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby bjaxking24 on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:30 pm

DusterBuster wrote:
DanTown8587 wrote:This thread is sad. Mainly because the NBA ownership isn't run where if KJ got a group of guys together that the league would even approve them.


Exactly. The NBA isn't some fly-by-night organization where if you get a group of guys with money together and say "OK, here's our money, give us a team!" You have to have plans in place. They still have no solid plan to fix the arena situation, they have ideas and proposals, but nothing set in stone like Seattle has. They've got all their ducks in a row and the next 5 years are all mapped out. Even if by some odd chance KJ rounded up enough people to match the Seattle offer, they still need to have a set in stone plan to get the Kings in a updated arena and make them profitable. Seattle has those plans set up, KJ simply doesn't and won't have those plans set up in time to keep them there. This type of thing takes years to plan, the Balmer/Hansen group has already put in the time to plan all that out.


You are terribly misinformed... Sacramento DOES have an arena plan. An arena plan that the Maloofs even agreed to then backed out of because they did not want to way $3 Mil of developmental fees. That deal is still on the table waiting for someone who isn't a clown to come scoop it up. Do some research before say say things like Sacramento doesn't have a plan.
bjaxking24
Sophomore
 
Posts: 213
And1: 7
Joined: Apr 5, 2010

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby Phil XI on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:30 pm

deNIEd wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
deNIEd wrote:Because all of a sudden the Maloofs sold the team. When the news started coming out about the Kings being sold to Hansen's group, the minority owners were not even notified of the King's dealings. Don't you think the other 35% of the owners should at least be given the courtesy of letting them know that you're thinking about selling?


They're called minority owners for a reason. They can have a say and their concerns aired, but the final decision always lies with whoever the majority owners are. In this case, that's soon to be the Hansen/Balmer group.

Same way with investing in a huge corporation. You may own a couple shares of Apple, but you don't get to tell Tim Cook what he does or doesn't put into the next iPhone or where he gets to move the Apple HQ.



I know they are minority owners. But they still own a large portion...and many of them have been owners far longer than the Maloofs. It's just a sign of complete and utter lack of respect.

Most business owners become rich by stomping on others. It's a sad but true reality. The Maloofs are out for the Maloofs.
Image
User avatar
Phil XI
Global Mod
 
Posts: 21571
And1: 33
Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Location: Nuclear Winter

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby DanTown8587 on Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:34 pm

bjaxking24 wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
DanTown8587 wrote:This thread is sad. Mainly because the NBA ownership isn't run where if KJ got a group of guys together that the league would even approve them.


Exactly. The NBA isn't some fly-by-night organization where if you get a group of guys with money together and say "OK, here's our money, give us a team!" You have to have plans in place. They still have no solid plan to fix the arena situation, they have ideas and proposals, but nothing set in stone like Seattle has. They've got all their ducks in a row and the next 5 years are all mapped out. Even if by some odd chance KJ rounded up enough people to match the Seattle offer, they still need to have a set in stone plan to get the Kings in a updated arena and make them profitable. Seattle has those plans set up, KJ simply doesn't and won't have those plans set up in time to keep them there. This type of thing takes years to plan, the Balmer/Hansen group has already put in the time to plan all that out.


You are terribly misinformed... Sacramento DOES have an arena plan. An arena plan that the Maloofs even agreed to then backed out of because they did not want to way $3 Mil of developmental fees. That deal is still on the table waiting for someone who isn't a clown to come scoop it up. Do some research before say say things like Sacramento doesn't have a plan.


I'm not arguing that a plan doesn't exist, I'm arguing that the Kevin Johnson or anyone else could put up money and then say "the team has to stay in Sacramento because I am the buyer". That's not how buying the Kings has gone.
Total Money Spent keeping Marco, Thomas, #20, #49, using MMLE: $99.4925 million
DanTown8587
RealGM
 
Posts: 22386
And1: 132
Joined: Jan 6, 2008
Location: Chicago

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby Shem on Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:02 am

Misleading title.
July 24, 2012:
d-train wrote:We have a lot riding on a rookie PG who is going to make fat Felton look like a 1st team All-NBA player.


May 14, 2013:
d-train wrote:But, as I said, Fatty Felton would have helped the Blazers win more games than Lillard did.
User avatar
Shem
General Manager
 
Posts: 7840
And1: 102
Joined: Dec 15, 2009
Location: Vancouver

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby ComboGuardCity on Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:06 am

This guy just loves to Bait. Kevin Johnson has absolutely no say at this point. Its up to the BOG.
The Rise of Shamu begins in Auburn Hills on June 27th, 2013
User avatar
ComboGuardCity
RealGM
 
Posts: 15999
And1: 127
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
Location: I bet against Kemba Walker and lost

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby Ian4 on Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:15 am

Striders wrote:
WhamBamSlamm wrote:Already has 19 guys part of a group to match and/or surpass the Seattle offer...

Deal with it


Does anyone outside of Seattle and Sac really care about this? I don't think anyone would be too sore over the outcome of this, whatever it may be.

yea i could care less what happens here, but it's still amusing.
Image
Sig by Lynx
User avatar
Ian4
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1655
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Location: Toronto

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby Celtics_35 on Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:19 am

ComboGuardCity wrote:This guy just loves to Bait. Kevin Johnson has absolutely no say at this point. Its up to the BOG.


Agreed, this is an obvious troll by a desperate Kings fan. I feel sorry for Sacramento fans bigtime, but I am losing a tiny bit of sympathy for them the more I see childish rants like the OP.

Right now its about a 95 percent chance the kings are moving, I wouldn't like to bet against that odds.
User avatar
Celtics_35
Junior
 
Posts: 296
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 29, 2011
Location: Celtic Nation Down Under

Re: KJ keeping the Kings in Sacramento

Postby PRESTIGE on Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:30 am

Has a franchise on the verge of moving in recent history ever, I mean ever, ended up staying? The Grizzlies, Hornets, Sonics, and Nets made some noise but all ended up eventually leaving. Plus Stern is not impartial in this, he actually wants the Kings to move to Seattle. I think they're gone.
User avatar
PRESTIGE
Starter
 
Posts: 2266
And1: 96
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
Location: The secret impresses no one. The trick you use it for is everything.

PreviousNext

Return to General NBA Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aaron Hotchner, adjacent2bench, adrien broner, AfricanSensation, aim2please, alebaba, An Unbiased Fan, apokalypse, AQuintus, areg789, Asianiac_24, BarnabyJones, BattleTested, beans-boy, BeatDaHeat420, BigAkers, bigboi, Bill Bradley, BirdIsDaKing, bklynstoops, Bleedsgreen, BlueJayReyes, Bodhi, BoomFizzle, Brauer, Browns16, Brt19, Bucksfans1and2, BurntToast, BVPN, Canada_7, Carmelo7, carpediem, catch20two, Cellphone, CelticGamecock, Chali2Na, Chalky White, chefy, ChiTownJedi, chrisab123, Ckay, Cleveland Cavs, CodyB_, Collie, conker1, COSBY, Da-Met, DavidSterned, december, Deepness5134, DGrangeRx33, dike77, DLaren, Don Ford, DRoseCantStop, DWadeFTW, dyukcs, ehmjay1, ElMatatan, engelbert321, Ettorefm, FairDinkum, fart, fedade, Fitz303, floydfan29, G35, G[o][o]se, GameChannel, GameOver25, Garmfay, Geaux_Hawks, Gene, GhostsOfGil, GreenBloodedC, GreenKnight0028, grumpysaddle, Guy986, harold lewis, hazy_01, headache88, Heat3, HEAT33, Heatmagic84, Heej, hellomichael, HelloPrimo, Heroball, hisairness, Hodges4Three, hoops4life, Ian4, Illmatic21, illmatic24, Illogicality, Im Coming Home, ImmortalD24, imonaboat, inquisitive, Jeremy Lin 7, JesusHCoxMd, JF5, jg77, jjin28, JNelson43, Jo Jo English, Joao Saraiva, JSmooth93, Juggynaut, justinandimcool, kaitanuva, Kate Upton, KB24TBOTB, KD35willbeGOAT, Kenyon009, kerry kittles, kidco2, KidNine, King John, Kobe8Forever, kosarev, Kupchak9, kvash37, LOUiS-D, LoveDaBoo, MaceCase, MagicStarwipe, Magz50, Maluco Beleza, marcroboy, martypython, MastaStrategist, MauleR, MellowRose, MrHidden, mtMD, Murk, mzepol, n3bomb, NapoleonII, Ninjek, noobcake, Nuntius, Nutty Nats Fan, ny_illmatic, Nyk_Fatboy, OFWGKTA, PacificBlazer, Paradise, Phil XI, picc, PierceFan4ever, Prime James, primetime024, Pro Lurker, R9ndo, Radin, rapluva, RaptorNews, raptorsfan24, ratrac, reignfire, reload141, rh9, Roger Murdock, Ron Anderson, rottenzombie, Rouk, RSP83, Sache, SacTownKings4Life, salgabri, Sasaki, Schwag, Scubetrolis, sdeezy, semi-sentient, Senior, Setshot33, shmito17, ShowTimeERA, Sinant, sinista, Sleep, snoopdogg88, Snoopie, Southward1, SparksAC, Spates, spectacularmove, Stickee, StojkoVrankovic, stussysupreme1, sule, summary, Tai, Taki, TARIQ, Tazo, TeeheeDumDum, Teh-Monkey-Man, tesla4, TheBargnaniRule, TheChosen618, thejigglyroom, theokie, TheRealBlizzy, TheRobin, TheUroborosWorm, TorontoRaptures, TRIPLEGAPE, trufan24, Ultra, UncleDrew, UrbanLegendMD, uzy, Valid, vi3t, VINO 24, Vorticity, Walid, weberoth, Wiggert, Wile E. Coyote, willimik, wins2, Wolf_Cry, Wolfay, Wolves21, Wonderllama, Woodsanity, Xepa777, XerifBill, Yank3525, yCH