Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Moderators: Morten Jensen, Blame Rasho, magnumt, tsherkin, Doctor MJ, Flash3, UGA Hayes, Yuri Vaultin, Mark K, NO-KG-AI

User avatar
sanity
RealGM
Posts: 17,551
And1: 1,804
Joined: Jul 08, 2009

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#81 » by sanity » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:33 am

justinian wrote:Mullens is Bargs-like tonight, 1-for-12 with 2pts


Arguably still having a better night than Andrea.
User avatar
spearsy23
General Manager
Posts: 7,640
And1: 975
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#82 » by spearsy23 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:16 am

Mullens is bargs?
bertrob wrote:You can't drive past Fisher when his shorts are pulled up
impossible, not even Michael Jordan can do it
LHead2
Junior
Posts: 488
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 18, 2009

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#83 » by LHead2 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:01 am

Look, Bargnani's bad, but Mullens isn't exactly a star either. I mean, the dude's shooting below 40% on the season.

They both are awful, though...
User avatar
BizGilwalker
RealGM
Posts: 26,745
And1: 3,265
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
Location: #biznation
     

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#84 » by BizGilwalker » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:02 am

Mully couldn't get it going tonight at all. He had a good 3 or 4 shots roll around the inside of the rim and pop out. He was also taking somw bad shots.
fatlever wrote:Lamb Gang logic - Kemba Walker is faking his injury as his way of a silent protest against not trading for Lamb. You guys are officially off the rails.
:lol:
User avatar
spearsy23
General Manager
Posts: 7,640
And1: 975
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#85 » by spearsy23 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:04 am

"He was taking some bad shots"

Well yeah, he's never seen a shot he couldn't take.
bertrob wrote:You can't drive past Fisher when his shorts are pulled up
impossible, not even Michael Jordan can do it
OKC
Ballboy
Posts: 46
And1: 7
Joined: Nov 15, 2012

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#86 » by OKC » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:42 am

It seems like there's always a BJ Mullens thread posted after he has a good game. Then it becomes a ghost town when he plays like tonight.
Johnlac1
Veteran
Posts: 2,824
And1: 451
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
 

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#87 » by Johnlac1 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:40 pm

OKC wrote:It seems like there's always a BJ Mullens thread posted after he has a good game. Then it becomes a ghost town when he plays like tonight.

Just like those threads for Nash when goes 2-11....like he did last night.
Johnlac1
Veteran
Posts: 2,824
And1: 451
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
 

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#88 » by Johnlac1 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:44 pm

Biz Gilwalker wrote:Mully couldn't get it going tonight at all. He had a good 3 or 4 shots roll around the inside of the rim and pop out. He was also taking somw bad shots.

Only maybe one or two shots were questionable. Most of his shots were good shots. Wide open. He just couldn't make them. Neither could Sessions who was 0-9. Last night Nash was 2-11 and Greg Monroe was 2-9. But I guess they're lousy players like Mullens too.
Illuminati_
Starter
Posts: 2,002
And1: 322
Joined: Oct 31, 2009

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#89 » by Illuminati_ » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:54 pm

Guess we gotta wait on Barg to switch teams cause really there's no comparison. If they out this mullens kid on some of those horrible rosters the past 4 years and made him the number one option drawing all the attention it would be ugly/
Krodis
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,910
And1: 98
Joined: Nov 28, 2009

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#90 » by Krodis » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:06 pm

Johnlac1 wrote:
OKC wrote:It seems like there's always a BJ Mullens thread posted after he has a good game. Then it becomes a ghost town when he plays like tonight.

Just like those threads for Nash when goes 2-11....like he did last night.

Did you just compare Byron Mullens to Steve Nash?
Blame Rasho
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 36,158
And1: 3,076
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#91 » by Blame Rasho » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:50 pm

Johnlac1 wrote:
Biz Gilwalker wrote:Mully couldn't get it going tonight at all. He had a good 3 or 4 shots roll around the inside of the rim and pop out. He was also taking somw bad shots.

Only maybe one or two shots were questionable. Most of his shots were good shots. Wide open. He just couldn't make them. Neither could Sessions who was 0-9. Last night Nash was 2-11 and Greg Monroe was 2-9. But I guess they're lousy players like Mullens too.


It is really that hard to come to terms that Mullens sucks at shooting? You just compared him to two guys who for their career basically have a 50% percentage. Mullens is a 40% shooter, and 30% from three... there are only so many ways you can sugarcoat crap.

The idea of this thread is that Mullens is supposed to be what Bargnani is suppose to be? Well Mullens is a worse player... You don't win with players like Mullens or Bargnani... you lose because of them. They are only good for is getting lotto picks.
It is illogical to use logic on an illogical person.
Solution...use even more illogical logic to trump their logic.
Things I have learned on the general board this week
The Spurs are semi tanking and aren't interesting in repeating.

Return to The General Board