Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Moderators: magnumt, NO-KG-AI, Knickstape1214, Yuri Vaultin, Blame Rasho, tsherkin, KF10

User avatar
sanity
RealGM
Posts: 17,551
And1: 1,804
Joined: Jul 08, 2009

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#81 » by sanity » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:33 am

justinian wrote:Mullens is Bargs-like tonight, 1-for-12 with 2pts


Arguably still having a better night than Andrea.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 10,877
And1: 2,244
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#82 » by spearsy23 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:16 am

Mullens is bargs?
Stephen A Smith wrote:we're all the same folks who don't know *&%$ about the game of basketball.

Join the CamPayne 2015
LHead2
Junior
Posts: 488
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 18, 2009

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#83 » by LHead2 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:01 am

Look, Bargnani's bad, but Mullens isn't exactly a star either. I mean, the dude's shooting below 40% on the season.

They both are awful, though...
User avatar
MotorKeepsGoing
RealGM
Posts: 31,849
And1: 4,215
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
Location: Bismarck, ND
   

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#84 » by MotorKeepsGoing » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:02 am

Mully couldn't get it going tonight at all. He had a good 3 or 4 shots roll around the inside of the rim and pop out. He was also taking somw bad shots.
sig creds to amcoolio
Image
lin is ok wrote:Nah i will never be a kemba fan. If kemba was that great hornets would have been in the playoffs last year. Beaten lebron this year. Lin is a winner even when he sucks.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 10,877
And1: 2,244
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#85 » by spearsy23 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:04 am

"He was taking some bad shots"

Well yeah, he's never seen a shot he couldn't take.
Stephen A Smith wrote:we're all the same folks who don't know *&%$ about the game of basketball.

Join the CamPayne 2015
OKC
Ballboy
Posts: 46
And1: 7
Joined: Nov 15, 2012

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#86 » by OKC » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:42 am

It seems like there's always a BJ Mullens thread posted after he has a good game. Then it becomes a ghost town when he plays like tonight.
Johnlac1
Analyst
Posts: 3,535
And1: 663
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
 

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#87 » by Johnlac1 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:40 pm

OKC wrote:It seems like there's always a BJ Mullens thread posted after he has a good game. Then it becomes a ghost town when he plays like tonight.

Just like those threads for Nash when goes 2-11....like he did last night.
Johnlac1
Analyst
Posts: 3,535
And1: 663
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
 

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#88 » by Johnlac1 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:44 pm

Biz Gilwalker wrote:Mully couldn't get it going tonight at all. He had a good 3 or 4 shots roll around the inside of the rim and pop out. He was also taking somw bad shots.

Only maybe one or two shots were questionable. Most of his shots were good shots. Wide open. He just couldn't make them. Neither could Sessions who was 0-9. Last night Nash was 2-11 and Greg Monroe was 2-9. But I guess they're lousy players like Mullens too.
Illuminati_
Starter
Posts: 2,102
And1: 346
Joined: Oct 31, 2009

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#89 » by Illuminati_ » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:54 pm

Guess we gotta wait on Barg to switch teams cause really there's no comparison. If they out this mullens kid on some of those horrible rosters the past 4 years and made him the number one option drawing all the attention it would be ugly/
Krodis
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,216
And1: 275
Joined: Nov 28, 2009

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#90 » by Krodis » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:06 pm

Johnlac1 wrote:
OKC wrote:It seems like there's always a BJ Mullens thread posted after he has a good game. Then it becomes a ghost town when he plays like tonight.

Just like those threads for Nash when goes 2-11....like he did last night.

Did you just compare Byron Mullens to Steve Nash?
User avatar
Blame Rasho
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 37,495
And1: 4,520
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be 

Post#91 » by Blame Rasho » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:50 pm

Johnlac1 wrote:
Biz Gilwalker wrote:Mully couldn't get it going tonight at all. He had a good 3 or 4 shots roll around the inside of the rim and pop out. He was also taking somw bad shots.

Only maybe one or two shots were questionable. Most of his shots were good shots. Wide open. He just couldn't make them. Neither could Sessions who was 0-9. Last night Nash was 2-11 and Greg Monroe was 2-9. But I guess they're lousy players like Mullens too.


It is really that hard to come to terms that Mullens sucks at shooting? You just compared him to two guys who for their career basically have a 50% percentage. Mullens is a 40% shooter, and 30% from three... there are only so many ways you can sugarcoat crap.

The idea of this thread is that Mullens is supposed to be what Bargnani is suppose to be? Well Mullens is a worse player... You don't win with players like Mullens or Bargnani... you lose because of them. They are only good for is getting lotto picks.
It is illogical to use logic on an illogical person.
Solution...use even more illogical logic to trump their logic.
Things I have learned on the general board this week
Tim Duncan is that he has 0 fundamentals

Return to The General Board